A Novel Prothrombin Time Assay for Assessing the Anticoagulant Activity of Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 522-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Chen Barrett ◽  
Zhaoqing Wang ◽  
Robert M. Knabb
2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
pp. 967-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Olah ◽  
Mariann Szarvas ◽  
Zsuzsanna Bereczky ◽  
Adrienne Kerenyi ◽  
Janos Kappelmayer ◽  
...  

Context.—Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a heterogeneous group of antiphospholipid antibodies. Among others, diluted prothrombin time (dPT) is a sensitive screening test for LA; however, the interpretation of LA tests is difficult in patients treated with anticoagulants. The effect of different types of anticoagulants on the result of LA tests, particularly on dPT, has not been studied extensively. Objective.—To determine whether the direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and argatroban and the predominantly factor Xa inhibitors enoxaparin, danaparoid, and fondaparinux could interfere with LA screening based on dPT. Design.—Each drug was added to normal and LA-positive plasmas in clinically relevant concentrations. Each sample was tested for dPT. Samples with factor Xa inhibitors were investigated before and after addition of heparinase. Mixing and confirmatory tests for LA were not performed. Results.—In the presence of lepirudin or argatroban, dPT increased notably and the dPT ratio exceeded the cutoff value even at subtherapeutic concentrations resulting in false positivity. With increasing factor Xa inhibitor concentrations, a linear increase of dPT ratios and false-positive results were also demonstrated. Although heparinase could almost completely neutralize the anti-Xa effect of all investigated factor Xa inhibitors, dPT ratio returned to the basal level only in case of enoxaparin. Conclusions.—Here we provide evidence that both the direct thrombin and indirect factor Xa inhibitors influence dPT assay for LA, causing false positivity. This should be considered when interpreting LA results during anticoagulant therapy. However, dPT seems to be a reliable test for LA screening under enoxaparin therapy after neutralization by heparinase.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Nafee ◽  
Aysha Aslam ◽  
Gerald Chi ◽  
Seyedmahdi Pahlavani ◽  
Dima Nimri ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (21) ◽  
pp. 5801-5805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentine J. Klimkowski ◽  
Brian M. Watson ◽  
Michael R. Wiley ◽  
John Liebeschuetz ◽  
Jeffry B. Franciskovich ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burcu TUNCAY ◽  
Selma Ari ◽  
Hasan Ari ◽  
Sencer CAMCI ◽  
Mehmet MELEK ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of iohexol as a contrast agent on the anticoagulant activity of oral factor Xa inhibitors. Methods:The study included 65 people who underwent contrast computerized tomography (CT). Patients in group 1 were using rivaroxaban (20 patients), patients in group 2 were using apixaban (20 patients), patients in group 3 were using edoxaban (20 patients), and group 4 was the control group (5 volunteers). Iohexol (60ml) was used as a contrast agent. Two tubes were used to collect 2 ml of blood from the patients at 4 hours after the drug dose (rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) and 1 hour after the contrast CT (CT was performed 3 hours after the drug was taken). In the control group, at any time and 1 hour after contrast CT, 2 tubes of 2 ml of blood were collected. The anticoagulant properties of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were evaluated using anti-factor Xa levels. Results:The anti-factor Xa level was increased after using the contrast agent in the rivaroxaban group (0.66±0.32U/ml vs. 0.67±0.32U/ml; p=0.01) and the edoxaban group (0.74±0.35 U/ml vs. 0.76±0.36 U/ml; p=0.006). However, there was no significant difference in the apixaban group (0.66±0.33U/ml vs. 0.66±0.32U/ml; p=0.21) and control group (0.02±0.01U/ml vs. 0.03±0.01U/ml; p=0.33).Conclusion:The anticoagulant properties of rivaroxaban and edoxaban tended to increase significantly, but there was no statistically significant difference in the anticoagulant properties of apixaban with contrast agent. The increasing is too small so that these laboratory results need to validate with larger clinical trials(NCT04611386).


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 975-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Medvedeva ◽  
A. Yu. Potapov ◽  
I. V. Gribkova ◽  
E. V. Katkova ◽  
V. B. Sulimov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 158-164
Author(s):  
Masahiro Ieko ◽  
Kazumasa Ohmura ◽  
Sumiyoshi Naito ◽  
Mika Yoshida ◽  
Ichiro Sakuma ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S17-S18
Author(s):  
Zahra Alipour ◽  
Ronald Jackups

Abstract Introduction Andexanet alfa, a reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in May 2018 for patients with life-threatening bleeding. It acts by competing with endogenous factor Xa to block anticoagulant activity. Intravenous administration rapidly reduces anti-factor Xa activity. Because andexanet became available only recently, there is high potential for inappropriate use. Our objective was to investigate utilization and laboratory monitoring of andexanet in our hospital system in order to improve utilization. Methods This is a retrospective study with review of charts in the electronic medical record from April 2019 to February 2020. Charts were reviewed for the time of andexanet administration, anti-factor Xa testing before and after administration, turnaround time (TAT) for anti-factor Xa testing, and patient’s status after treatment. Results We identified 33 patients who received andexanet in our hospital system. Intracranial hemorrhage was the most common clinical symptom. Of 33 patients, 12 patients (36%) expired, one transferred to hospice, 18 (55%) were discharged alive, and two recent cases are alive awaiting disposition. Only 12 patients (36%) had anti-factor Xa testing performed prior to administration of andexanet, with one additional patient receiving testing only after administration. Factor Xa activity was misordered for anti-factor Xa in one patient. TAT for anti-factor Xa in these patients ranged from 25–112 minutes, with median 35.5 minutes. Of the 12 patients who had anti-factor Xa testing prior to administration, 4 expired and 8 survived. Pre-administration anti-factor Xa activity was significantly lower in patients who expired than in patients who survived (0.3 vs. 1.8 IU/ml, P value = 0.02). Conclusion Currently, anti-factor Xa testing is not ordered for most patients receiving andexanet alfa in our hospital system. Although not necessary for dosing decisions, anti-factor Xa testing may be useful prior to administration to identify patients unlikely to benefit from anticoagulant reversal. Despite a small sample size, there was a statistically significant difference in anti-factor Xa activity by patient outcome, suggesting that andexanet may be unhelpful in patients with low anti-factor Xa activity. Based on these findings, we are building an electronic order set to facilitate proper administration of this medication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document