When do sensitive periods emerge later in development?

Author(s):  
Dylan G. Gee
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 211 (6) ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Dunn ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Jenny Tse ◽  
Katie A. McLaughlin ◽  
Garrett Fitzmaurice ◽  
...  

BackgroundAlthough childhood adversity is a strong determinant of psychopathology, it remains unclear whether there are ‘sensitive periods’ when a first episode of adversity is most harmful.AimsTo examine whether variation in the developmental timing of a first episode of interpersonal violence (up to age 18) associates with risk for psychopathology.MethodUsing cross-sectional data, we examined the association between age at first exposure to four types of interpersonal violence (physical abuse by parents, physical abuse by others, rape, and sexual assault/molestation) and onset of four classes of DSM-IV disorders (distress, fear, behaviour, substance use) (n=9984). Age at exposure was defined as: early childhood (ages 0–5), middle childhood (ages 6–10) and adolescence (ages 11–18).ResultsExposure to interpersonal violence at any age period about doubled the risk of a psychiatric disorder (odds ratios (ORs) = 1.51–2.52). However, few differences in risk were observed based on the timing of first exposure. After conducting 20 tests of association, only three significant differences in risk were observed based on the timing of exposure; these results suggested an elevated risk of behaviour disorder among youth first exposed to any type of interpersonal violence during adolescence (OR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.69–3.34), especially being beaten by another person (OR = 2.44; 95% CI 1.57–3.79), and an elevated risk of substance use disorder among youth beaten by someone during adolescence (OR=2.77, 95% CI 1.94–3.96).ConclusionsChildren exposed to interpersonal violence had an elevated risk of psychiatric disorder. However, age at first episode of exposure was largely unassociated with psychopathology risk.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Thompson ◽  
Nikolaus Steinbeis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malalaniaina Rakotobe ◽  
Niels Fjerdingstad ◽  
Nuria Ruiz-Reig ◽  
Thomas Lamonerie ◽  
Fabien D'Autréaux

Abstract Experiencing stress during sensitive periods of brain development has a major impact on how individuals cope with later stress. Although many become more prone to develop anxiety or depression, some appear resilient. The mechanisms underlying these differences are unknown. Key answers may lie in how genetic and environmental stressors interact to shape the circuits controlling emotions. Here we studied the role of the habenulo-interpeducuncular system (HIPS), a critical node of reward circuits, in early stress-induced anxiety. We found that a subcircuit of this system, characterized by Otx2 expression, is particularly responsive to chronic stress during puberty, which induces HIPS hypersensitivity to later stress and susceptibility to develop anxiety. We further show that Otx2 deletion restricted to the HIPS counteracts these effects of stress. Together, these results demonstrate that Otx2 and stress interact, around puberty, to shape the HIPS stress-response, revealed here as a key modulator of susceptibility/resilience to develop anxiety.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 630-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Swain

The consideration of humans going through sensitive periods of life, such as childhood and the early postpartum, may be helpful in understanding the cognitive and evolutionary puzzle of human rituals. During such periods, certain brain systems may mediate an increased susceptibility to learn new behaviors, rational or irrational.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (15) ◽  
pp. 2562-2572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Dunn ◽  
Thomas W. Soare ◽  
Miriam R. Raffeld ◽  
Daniel S. Busso ◽  
Katherine M. Crawford ◽  
...  

BackgroundAlthough childhood adversity is a potent determinant of psychopathology, relatively little is known about how the characteristics of adversity exposure, including its developmental timing or duration, influence subsequent mental health outcomes. This study compared three models from life course theory (recency, accumulation, sensitive period) to determine which one(s) best explained this relationship.MethodsProspective data came from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (n= 7476). Four adversities commonly linked to psychopathology (caregiver physical/emotional abuse; sexual/physical abuse; financial stress; parent legal problems) were measured repeatedly from birth to age 8. Using a statistical modeling approach grounded in least angle regression, we determined the theoretical model(s) explaining the most variability (r2) in psychopathology symptoms measured at age 8 using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and evaluated the magnitude of each association.ResultsRecencywas the best fitting theoretical model for the effect of physical/sexual abuse (girlsr2= 2.35%; boysr2= 1.68%). Bothrecency(girlsr2= 1.55%) andaccumulation(boysr2= 1.71%) were the best fitting models for caregiver physical/emotional abuse.Sensitive periodmodels were chosen alone (parent legal problems in boysr2= 0.29%) and withaccumulation(financial stress in girlsr2= 3.08%) more rarely. Substantial effect sizes were observed (standardized mean differences = 0.22–1.18).ConclusionsChild psychopathology symptoms are primarily explained by recency and accumulation models. Evidence for sensitive periods did not emerge strongly in these data. These findings underscore the need to measure the characteristics of adversity, which can aid in understanding disease mechanisms and determining how best to reduce the consequences of exposure to adversity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document