scholarly journals First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65
Author(s):  
Sa Ra Lee ◽  
A-mi Roh ◽  
Kyungah Jeong ◽  
Sung Hoon Kim ◽  
Hee Dong Chae ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S1577
Author(s):  
M. Covas Moschovas ◽  
S. Bhat ◽  
M. Sandri ◽  
T. Rogers ◽  
E. Mazzone ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S36
Author(s):  
M. Covas Moschovas ◽  
S. Bhat ◽  
T. Rogers ◽  
F. Onol ◽  
E. Mazzone ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 3566-3573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kroh ◽  
Kevin El-Hayek ◽  
Steven Rosenblatt ◽  
Bipan Chand ◽  
Pedro Escobar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. LaMattina ◽  
Josue Alvarez-Casas ◽  
Irene Lu ◽  
Jessica M. Powell ◽  
Samuel Sultan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
pp. 3572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Philipp Grimminger ◽  
Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis ◽  
Hubert Stein ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
Richard van Hillegersberg ◽  
...  

In recent years, the evolution of advanced robotic medical systems has increased rapidly. These technical developments have led to advanced robotic systems, such as the da Vinci Xi, which allows superior controlled complex procedures and innovative surgical strategies. In esophageal surgery, the robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) procedure is being developed and carried out with increasing frequency at centers worldwide. Recently, a new single port robotic system was introduced (da Vinci Single Port (SP)), which may allow for the exploration of new routes, such as transcervical robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (TC-RAMIE). This approach avoids opening the pleura by entering the mediastinum through the jugular window. In this report, we describe the technical steps of the TC-RAMIE using the new da Vinci SP system and compare it to the da Vinci Xi system.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-480
Author(s):  
Mariano Tamura Vieira Gomes ◽  
Andréa Maria Novaes Machado ◽  
Sérgio Podgaec ◽  
Gustavo Anderman Silva Barison

ABSTRACT Objective: This article presents the first series of robotic single-port hysterectomy cases performed at a hospital in Brazil. Methods: From November 2014 to October 2016, 11 patients were indicated to undergo, and nine of them were submitted to single-port hysterectomy using da Vinci Single-Site® platform. However, in two patients, due to multiple previous abdominal surgeries, large uterine volume, and/or a uterus with no mobility, a pneumoperitoneum was performed with a Verres needle, and the pelvic cavity was assessed using a 5mm optics endoscope. In these cases, single-port surgery was not recommended; therefore, multiportal robotic access was chosen, and no intercurrent events were reported. Nine single-port cases were operated on by the same surgeon at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Patient data analyzed included age, body mass index, previous surgeries, and clinical diagnosis. Surgical data included operative time, skin incision, report of intraoperative complications, need for conversion to laparotomy, need for transfer to intensive care unit, need for blood transfusion, inadvertent injury to other organs, length of hospital stay, and death. Results: All cases were completed with da Vinci Single-Site® system, with no intercurrent events. Four patients presented with adenomyosis as the surgical indication, two had uterine myoma, one endometrial cancer, one endometrial polyp, and one desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. The mean age of patients was 44 years (range, 40 to 54 years), and body mass index varied between 23.4 and 33.2kg/m2 (mean 26.4). No complications occurred in any of the cases, such as intestinal or bladder injury, bleeding, or the need for a second surgery. All nine procedures were completed with the robotic single-port access, and no patient required a blood transfusion. Conclusion: Although this study merely presented an initial series of patients submitted to robotic single-port surgery, it demonstrated that the method is feasible and safe, suggesting the possible use of this technique in elective hysterectomy and other gynecological procedures in the future, as described in large reference centers of advanced surgery worldwide. Specifically, in gynecological practice, existing evidence on the use of robot-assisted, single-port surgery seems promising, and although it is not indicated in all cases, it should be considered as a surgical option. Nonetheless, further randomized and controlled clinical studies are necessary to establish the preeminence of robot-assisted, single-port surgery versus single-incision and conventional laparoscopy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document