The systematic-risk determinants of the US airline industry

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 434-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Soo Lee ◽  
SooCheong (Shawn) Jang
Keyword(s):  
Airline Industry ◽  
Systematic Risk ◽  
The Us ◽  
Risk Determinants

scholarly journals Cost convergence in the US airline industry: An analysis of unit costs 1995–2006

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerassimos Tsoukalas ◽  
Peter Belobaba ◽  
William Swelbar
Keyword(s):  
Airline Industry ◽  
Unit Costs ◽  
The Us

scholarly journals Measuring the Systematic Risk of Sectors within the US Market Via Principal Components Analysis: Before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime González Maiz Jiménez ◽  
Adán Reyes Santiago
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Principal Components Analysis ◽  
Principal Components ◽  
Systematic Risk ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Market Capitalization ◽  
The Us ◽  
Components Analysis

This research measures the systematic risk of 10 sectors in the American Stock Market, discerning the COVID-19 pandemic period. The novelty of this study is the use of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique to measure the systematic risk of each sector, selecting five stocks per sector with the greatest market capitalization. The results show that the sectors that have the greatest increase in exposure to systematic risk during the pandemic are restaurants, clothing, and insurance, whereas the sectors that show the greatest decrease in terms of exposure to systematic risk are automakers and tobacco. Due to the results of this study, it seems advisable for practitioners to select stocks that belong to either the automakers or tobacco sector to get protection from health crises, such as COVID-19.

The elephant in the room of mutual forbearance

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Cem Konduk
Keyword(s):  
Airline Industry ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
High Performing ◽  
The Us ◽  
Mutual Forbearance ◽  
Low Performance ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explain how a multi-market firm develops the motivation to forbear from competition.Design/methodology/approachA two-way fixed effects model with Driscoll and Kraay standard errors investigates the research question with panel data collected from the US scheduled passenger airline industry.FindingsThe results demonstrate that although the interaction of multi-market contact with strategic similarity impairs a firm’s forbearance from competition, the same interaction promotes it as firm performance deteriorates, supporting the hypotheses.Research limitations/implicationsPerformance explains not only how forbearance emerges out of coincidental multi-market contact but also reconciles the mixed evidence for the impact of the two-way interaction between multi-market contact and strategic similarity on forbearance.Practical implicationsAntitrust authorities should pay more attention to low performing firms than to high performing firms in their investigations. Also, managers of multi-market firms should identify multi-market rivals with low performance as targets for the initiation of forbearance.Originality/valueThis study revises the mutual forbearance theory to align it with the accumulating empirical evidence that otherwise refutes its assumption and thereby improves theory’s descriptive and predictive power.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document