The Influence of the Organ Allocation Policy on a Patient's Chances of Undergoing Heart Transplantation and the Posttransplantation Survival Rate

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-I. Tsao ◽  
N.-K. Chou ◽  
N.-H. Chi ◽  
S.-C. Chen ◽  
W.-J. Ko ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose N. Nativi ◽  
Abdallah G. Kfoury ◽  
Craig Myrick ◽  
Melissa Peters ◽  
Dale Renlund ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wagih m Zayed ◽  
Neha Bansal ◽  
Snehal R Patel ◽  
Jacqueline M Lamour ◽  
Daniel J GOLDSTEIN ◽  
...  

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Heart transplant (HT) is one of the few options for the treatment of advanced HF in this growing population. In October 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) implemented a change in organ allocation criteria. The effect of this change on outcomes in ACHD patients (pts) after listing and transplant has not been evaluated. Hypothesis: Change in organ allocation criteria negatively impacts outcomes in ACHD patients. Methods: Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients in pts age > 18 years old listed for HT between Oct. 2016 and 0ct. 2019 and followed through March 2020 were analyzed. Pts were grouped by diagnosis (ACHD and non-ACHD) and by the time of listing (pre- and post-change in allocation criteria). Differences in comorbidities, outcomes while listed, and 1-year Kaplan Meier survival post-HT were compared among groups. For comparison, post-change criteria (status 1-6) were equated to pre-change criteria (status 1A, 1B, 2). Results: Over 3 years, 11,931 patients were listed for HT; 459 had a primary diagnosis of ACHD. ACHD was present in 279/7942 pts listed in the 2 years pre-change and 180/3989 pts in the year post-change. ACHD pts listed post-change were less likely to have a history of cardiac surgery (88% vs. 79%, p=0.01) and more likely to have an abnormal BMI (p=0.015) than ACHD pts pre-change. Post-change, ACHD pts were listed at a higher priority status compared to pre-change ACHD. (Figure). The proportion of pts transplanted with ACHD increased slightly pre- and post-change (3.7% vs. 4.1%). There was no difference in 1-year survival in ACHD pts transplanted pre- and post-change (Figure). Conclusions: Recent changes to the UNOS organ allocation policy increased the proportion of ACHD patients transplanted with no change in early post-HT survival.


2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES F. CHILDRESS

Organ allocation policy involves a mixture of ethical, scientific, medical, legal, and political factors, among others. It is thus hard, and perhaps even impossible, to identify and fully separate ethical considerations from all these other factors. Yet I will focus primarily on the ethical considerations embedded in the current debate in the United States about organ allocation policy. I will argue that it is important to put patients first—in the language of the title of one of the major public hearings—but even then significant ethical questions will remain about exactly how to put patients first.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document