scholarly journals Six-Month Post-Transplant Outcomes in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation with IABP or Impella Following 2018 UNOS Allocation Policy Change

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. S256
Author(s):  
R.O. Lee ◽  
A.S. Vaidya ◽  
A.M. Wolfson ◽  
E.C. DePasquale
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Akintoye ◽  
P Alvarez ◽  
D Shin ◽  
A Egbe ◽  
A Panos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The landscape of heart transplantation (HT) has changed significantly with respect to patient selection, surgical techniques, and patient outcomes. We sought to investigate temporal trends in patient characteristics, waitlist and post-transplant outcomes after HT in the U.S. Methods We queried the national database of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) to identify adults listed for HT in the U.S. between 1991 and 2019. Patients were divided into four eras based on the three time points in which changes were made to the patient selection/allocation policy (1999, 2006, and 2018), and patient characteristics as well as waitlist and post-transplant outcomes were evaluated for each era. Results Between 1991 and 2019, a total of 95,179 patients were added to the waitlist for HT in the U.S. Compared to era 1, patients listed in era 4 were older (mean age: 52.4 years), more female (27.6%) and ethnic minorities (40%), and with higher-risk comorbidities (28.8% diabetes, 35.6% obese). Over the study period, there were 22,070 waitlist deaths and 61,687 transplants. Compared to the preceding era, there was significant decrease in waitlist mortality in the last 2 eras (e.g., sub-hazard ratio for era 4 vs era 3 =0.37, 95% CI=0.32–0.44). For each year, only 27.1% to 40.5% of those on the waitlist were transplanted. Among those who were transplanted, there was increase in the rates of in-hospital stroke (2.8% in era 1 to 3.7% in era 4), renal failure requiring dialysis (7.2% to 17.1%), and hospital length of stay (14 to 17 days), p-values<0.001 for all. However, this has not negatively impacted short-term survival when compared to the preceding era (1-year graft survival = 89.7% in era 4). Based on a projection model, we predict a 47% increase in living adult heart transplant recipients to to 44,366 in 2040. Conclusion There have been significant changes in the characteristics of patients listed for HT in the U.S., including an increasing proportion of high-risk co-morbidities. Although the transplant volume has increased, the wide supply-demand gap persisted. The last 2 changes in the allocation policy in 2006 and 2018 achieved their primary objective of reducing waitlist mortality. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Coutance ◽  
P Leprince ◽  
P Demondion ◽  
N Jacob ◽  
L Nguyen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
G. Coutance ◽  
G. Lebreton ◽  
P. Demondion ◽  
N. Jacob ◽  
L. Nguyen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. S287-S288
Author(s):  
J.A. Kobashigawa ◽  
N. Reinsmoen ◽  
X. Zhang ◽  
M. Kittleson ◽  
T. Aintablian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren V. Huckaby ◽  
Laura M. Seese ◽  
Michael A. Mathier ◽  
Gavin W. Hickey ◽  
Arman Kilic

Background: This study evaluates the impact of the 2018 allocation policy change on outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in patients bridged with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). Methods: Adult (≥18 years) patients undergoing OHT between 2013 and 2019 who were bridged with an IABP were stratified based on temporal relation to the policy change. Univariate analysis was used to compare baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate risk-adjusted predictors of post-transplant mortality. Results: A total of 1342 (8.6%) OHT patients were bridged with an IABP during the study period. Rates of bridging with IABP to OHT increased significantly after the policy change (7.0% versus 24.9%, P <0.001). The mean recipient age was 54.1±12.1 years with 981 (73.1%) patients being male. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups whereas post–policy change patients spent fewer days on the waitlist (15 versus 35 days, P <0.001), had longer ischemic times (3.5 versus 3.0 hours, P <0.001), and received organs from a greater distance (301 versus 105 miles, P <0.001). By multivariable analysis, days on the waitlist (for every 30 days; odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00–1.02], P =0.031) and diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.16–3.02], P =0.011) emerged as significant predictors of post-transplant mortality. After the policy change, waitlisted patients requiring IABP support were more likely to survive to transplant (76.4 versus 89.8%, P <0.001). Conclusions: IABP utilization has increased over 3-fold since the 2018 policy change with improved waitlist outcomes and comparable post-OHT survival. Thus, bridging patients to OHT with IABPs appears to be an effective strategy in the current era.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document