Laboratory model tests and field investigations of EPB shield machine tunnelling in soft ground in Shanghai

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianwei Xu ◽  
Hehua Zhu ◽  
Wenqi Ding ◽  
Xiurun Ge
2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
D N Chapman ◽  
S K Ahn ◽  
D VL Hunt

The prediction of the ground movements above single tunnels in soft ground is well established and can be estimated using semi-empirical methods based on the Gaussian curve. However, the prediction of ground movements associated with closely spaced multiple tunnels, in particular side-by-side (sbs) tunnels, is not as well understood, and therefore simple predictive methods for this application are currently quite limited in terms of their accuracy. This paper describes results from a series of small-scale (1/50) laboratory model tests (conducted at 1g) carried out in Speswhite kaolin clay. These tests have been conducted to gain a greater understanding of the short-term ground movements associated with closely spaced multiple (sbs) tunnels. The observed ground movement results from these tests have shown many of the characteristics observed at full-scale in the published case studies. These results are compared to the commonly used Gaussian curve prediction method and demonstrate the potential inaccuracy in this approach for predicting ground movements associated with closely spaced multiple tunnels. A method that modifies the Gaussian curve approach is also applied to the laboratory data and shows improved predictions.Key words: tunnelling, ground movements, multiple side-by-side tunnels, physical modelling, settlement prediction.


Author(s):  
Wenjun Zhang ◽  
Gaole Zhang ◽  
Huayang Lei ◽  
Mingming Jin ◽  
Atsushi Koizumi

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (10) ◽  
pp. 04020112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiongyu Hu ◽  
Chuan He ◽  
Gabriel Walton ◽  
Yong Fang ◽  
Guanghui Dai

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Dong Cui ◽  
Qiang Yuan ◽  
Jia-Qiang Yang
Keyword(s):  

Fluids ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Yang ◽  
Patrik Andreasson ◽  
Penghua Teng ◽  
Qiancheng Xie

Most of the hydropower dams in Sweden were built before 1980. The present dam-safety guidelines have resulted in higher design floods than their spillway discharge capacity and the need for structural upgrades. This has led to renewed laboratory model tests. For some dams, even computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed. This provides the possibility to compare the spillway discharge data between the model tests performed a few decades apart. The paper presents the hydropower development, the needs for the ongoing dam rehabilitations and the history of physical hydraulic modeling in Sweden. More than 20 spillways, both surface and bottom types, are analyzed to evaluate their discharge modeling accuracy. The past and present model tests are compared with each other and with the CFD results if available. Discrepancies do exist in the discharges between the model tests made a few decades apart. The differences fall within the range −8.3%–+11.2%. The reasons for the discrepancies are sought from several aspects. The primary source of the errors is seemingly the model construction quality and flow measurement method. The machine milling technique and 3D printing reduce the source of construction errors and improve the model quality. Results of the CFD simulations differ, at the maximum, by 3.8% from the physical tests. They are conducted without knowledge of the physical model results in advance. Following the best practice guidelines, CFD should generate results of decent accuracy for discharge prediction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gichul Kweon ◽  
Sanglok Kim ◽  
Seokwoo Hong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document