scholarly journals Efficient analytical approach for high-pressure melting properties of iron

Vacuum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 185 ◽  
pp. 110001
Author(s):  
Tran Dinh Cuong ◽  
Anh D. Phan
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (25) ◽  
pp. 1950300
Author(s):  
Nguyen Quang Hoc ◽  
Tran Dinh Cuong ◽  
Bui Duc Tinh ◽  
Le Hong Viet

The high-pressure melting curves of defective metals Ni, Pd and Pt with face-centered cubic structure have been studied up to 100 GPa by using the statistical moment method. Our melting theory is based on the absolute stability limit for crystalline state. The effects of pressure and vacancies on the melting properties of Ni, Pd and Pt have been considered. These obtained results are consistent with previous experiments and other theoretical calculations.


2006 ◽  
Vol 353 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 221-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.J. Liu ◽  
X.W. Sun ◽  
Q.F. Chen ◽  
L.C. Cai ◽  
X.M. Tan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Briggs ◽  
D. Daisenberger ◽  
O. T. Lord ◽  
A. Salamat ◽  
E. Bailey ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 4161-4164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abby Kavner ◽  
Raymond Jeanloz

2019 ◽  
Vol 631 ◽  
pp. L4 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mazevet ◽  
R. Musella ◽  
F. Guyot

Context. The Juno probe that currently orbits Jupiter measures its gravitational moments with great accuracy. Preliminary results suggest that the core of the planet may be eroded. While great attention has been paid to the material properties of elements constituting the envelope, little is known about those that constitute the core. This situation clutters our interpretation the Juno data and modeling of giant planets and exoplanets in general. Aims. We calculate the high-pressure melting temperatures of three potential components of the cores of giant planets, water, iron, and a simple silicate, MgSiO3, to investigate the state of the deep inner core. Methods. We used ab initio molecular dynamics simulations to calculate the high-pressure melting temperatures of the three potential core components. The planetary adiabats were obtained by solving the hydrostatic equations in a three-layer model adjusted to reproduce the measured gravitational moments. Recently developed ab initio equations of state were used for the envelope and the core. Results. We find that the cores of the giant and ice-giant planets of the solar system differ because the pressure–temperature conditions encountered in each object correspond to different regions of the phase diagrams. For Jupiter and Saturn, the results are compatible with a diffuse core and mixing of a significant fraction of metallic elements in the envelope, leading to a convective and/or a double-diffusion regime. We also find that their solid cores vary in nature and size throughout the lifetimes of these planets. The solid cores of the two giant planets are not primordial and nucleate and grow as the planets cool. We estimate that the solid core of Jupiter is 3 Gyr old and that of Saturn is 1.5 Gyr old. The situation is less extreme for Uranus and Neptune, whose cores are only partially melted. Conclusions. To model Jupiter, the time evolution of the interior structure of the giant planets and exoplanets in general, their luminosity, and the evolution of the tidal effects over their lifetimes, the core should be considered as crystallizing and growing rather than gradually mixing into the envelope due to the solubility of its components.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Smithies ◽  
Yongjun Lu ◽  
Tim E. Johnson ◽  
Christopher L. Kirkland ◽  
Kevin F. Cassidy ◽  
...  

AbstractMuch of the present-day volume of Earth’s continental crust had formed by the end of the Archean Eon, 2.5 billion years ago, through the conversion of basaltic (mafic) crust into sodic granite of tonalite, trondhjemite and granodiorite (TTG) composition. Distinctive chemical signatures in a small proportion of these rocks, the so-called high-pressure TTG, are interpreted to indicate partial melting of hydrated crust at pressures above 1.5 GPa (>50 km depth), pressures typically not reached in post-Archean continental crust. These interpretations significantly influence views on early crustal evolution and the onset of plate tectonics. Here we show that high-pressure TTG did not form through melting of crust, but through fractionation of melts derived from metasomatically enriched lithospheric mantle. Although the remaining, and dominant, group of Archean TTG did form through melting of hydrated mafic crust, there is no evidence that this occurred at depths significantly greater than the ~40 km average thickness of modern continental crust.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document