scholarly journals PRS7 Health Economic Analysis to Evaluate the Economic and Humanistic IMPACT of LEVEL I Versus LEVEL III Diagnosis of Obstructive SLEEP Apnea in India Among Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S99-S100
Author(s):  
A. Chahar ◽  
S. Joshi ◽  
N. Roy
Author(s):  
Byung-Hyun Han ◽  
Ji Min Yun ◽  
Ick Soo Choi

Background and Objectives Although studies of test-retest reliability of the standard polysomnography has been reported numerous times, studies of portable sleep devices have been reported in very few cases to date. The purpose of this study is to investigate the test-retest reliability of level III devices, to examine the characteristics of patients with tendency of underestimation and to determine whether there are factors that can predict when retest is needed. Subjects and Method We enrolled 74 patients for this study from April 2014 to March 2019. Two indicators were used to assess night to night variability. If the difference of apneahypopnea index (AHI) score was less than 10 or there is no difference of severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) between two nights, we decided that the results have a reliability. Results Seventeen out of 57 patients with an AHI difference of less than 10 showed unreliable results based on severity, and 3 out of 17 patients with the AHI difference more than 10 showed reliable results based on severity. Eight out of 74 patients were diagnosed at Night 2 but not at Night 1. In other words, about 11% of the subjects needed retest. Based on the change in severity of OSA, subjective sleep scores showed a statistically significant difference, indicating that the subjective sleep score should be considered when deciding a retest. AHI differed by more than 10 in about 23% of the subjects in this study, falling within “15%- 32%,” which has been reported in the literature on the level I test. Conclusion This suggests that there is no significant difference in reliability between level I and III.


2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pang Kenny ◽  
G. Gourin Christine ◽  
J. Terris David

Objective Our goal was to validate the WatchPAT in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Study Design We conducted a prospective, blinded, nonrandomized clinical trial. Methods Patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea scheduled for an overnight level I polysomnogram were offered enrollment in a study to compare the WatchPAT (Itamar Ltd, Israel) device with polysomnography. Patients wore the WatchPAT device simultaneously while undergoing polysomnography during evaluation in the sleep lab. Results Thirty-seven patients participated in the study. They had a mean age of 50.1 years (range, 31–73 years) and mean body mass index of 34.6 kg/m 2 (range, 21.2–46.8 kg/m 2 ). There was high correlation between the polysomnogram and WatchPAT apnea-hypopnea index ( r = 0.9288; 95% confidence interval = 0.8579–0.9650, P < 0.0001). The lowest oxygen saturation also showed high correlation ( r = 0.989; 95% confidence interval = 0.9773–0.9947, P < 0.0001). The overall polysomnogram and WatchPAT sleep times revealed a correlation of r = 0.5815 ( P = 0.005). Conclusion The WatchPAT showed a high correlation with the polysomnogram in apnea-hypopnea index, lowest oxygen saturation, and sleep time. Significance It's use as a reliable tool in the diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. A60
Author(s):  
R.D. Kim ◽  
V.K. Kapur ◽  
L. Garrison ◽  
S. Ramsey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document