scholarly journals Degradation of the encephalomyocarditis virus and hepatitis A virus 3C proteases by the ubiquitin/26S proteasome system in vivo

Virology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 360 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Schlax ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Elizabeth Lewis ◽  
Antonio Planchart ◽  
T. Glen Lawson
1990 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Lemon ◽  
L. N. Binn ◽  
R. Marchwicki ◽  
P. C. Murphy ◽  
L.-H. Ping ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Misumi ◽  
Zhucui Li ◽  
Lu Sun ◽  
Anshuman Das ◽  
Tomoyuki Shiota ◽  
...  

Iminosugar compounds are monosaccharide mimetics with broad but generally weak antiviral activities related to inhibition of enzymes involved in glycobiology. Miglustat (N-butyl-1-deoxynojirimycin), which is approved for treatment of lipid storage diseases in humans, and UV-4 (N-(9-methoxynonyl)-1-deoxynojirimycin), inhibit replication of hepatitis A virus (HAV) in cell culture (IC50 32.13 μM and 8.05 μM, respectively) by blocking the synthesis of gangliosides essential for HAV cell entry. We used a murine model of hepatitis A and targeted mass spectrometry to assess the capacity of these compounds to deplete hepatic gangliosides and modify the course of HAV infection in vivo. Miglustat, given by gavage to Ifnar1-/- mice (4800 mg/kg/day) depleted hepatic gangliosides by 69-75%, but caused substantial gastrointestinal toxicity and failed to prevent viral infection. UV-4, similarly administered in high doses (400 mg/kg/day), was well tolerated, but depleted hepatic gangliosides by only 20% after 14 days. UV-4 depletion of gangliosides varied by class. Several GM2 species were paradoxically increased, likely due to inhibition of β-glucosidases that degrade gangliosides. Both compounds enhanced, rather than reduced, virus replication. Nonetheless, both iminosugars had surprising anti-inflammatory effects, blocking the accumulation of inflammatory cells within the liver. UV-4 treatment also resulted in a decrease in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations associated with acute hepatitis A. These anti-inflammatory effects may result from iminosugar inhibition of cellular α-glucosidases, leading to impaired maturation of glycan moieties of chemokine and cytokine receptors, and point to the potential importance of paracrine signaling in the pathogenesis of acute hepatitis A. IMPORTANCE Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a common cause of viral hepatitis. Iminosugar compounds block its replication in cultured cells by inhibiting synthesis of gangliosides required for HAV cell entry, but have not been tested for their ability to prevent or treat hepatitis A in vivo. We show that high doses of the iminosugars miglustat and UV-4 fail to deplete gangliosides sufficiently to block HAV infection in mice lacking a key interferon receptor. These compounds nonetheless have striking anti-inflammatory effects on the HAV-infected liver, reducing the severity of hepatitis despite enhancing chemokine and cytokine expression resulting from hepatocyte-intrinsic antiviral responses. We propose that iminosugar inhibition of cellular α-glucosidases impairs maturation of glycan moieties of chemokine and cytokine receptors required for effective signaling. These data highlight the potential importance of paracrine signaling pathways in the inflammatory response to HAV, and add to our understanding of HAV pathogenesis in mice.


1984 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Bradley ◽  
Charles A. Schable ◽  
Karen A. McCaustland ◽  
E. H. Cook ◽  
Bert L. Murphy ◽  
...  

mBio ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asuka Hirai-Yuki ◽  
Lucinda Hensley ◽  
Jason K. Whitmire ◽  
Stanley M. Lemon

ABSTRACTHepatitis A virus (HAV) is an unusual picornavirus that is released from cells cloaked in host-derived membranes. These quasi-enveloped virions (eHAV) are the only particle type circulating in blood during infection, whereas only nonenveloped virions are shed in feces. The reason for this is uncertain. Hepatocytes, the only cell type known to support HAV replicationin vivo, are highly polarized epithelial cells with basolateral membranes facing onto hepatic (blood) sinusoids and apical membranes abutting biliary canaliculi from which bile is secreted to the gut. To assess whether eHAV and nonenveloped virus egress from cells via vectorially distinct pathways, we studied infected polarized cultures of Caco-2 and HepG2-N6 cells. Most (>99%) progeny virions were released apically from Caco-2 cells, whereas basolateral (64%) versus apical (36%) release was more balanced with HepG2-N6 cells. Both apically and basolaterally released virions were predominantly enveloped, with no suggestion of differential vectorial release of eHAV versus naked virions. Basolateral to apical transcytosis of either particle type was minimal (<0.02%/h) in HepG2-N6 cells, arguing against this as a mechanism for differences in membrane envelopment of serum versus fecal virus. High concentrations of human bile acids converted eHAV to nonenveloped virions, whereas virus present in bile from HAV-infectedIfnar1−/−Ifngr1−/−andMavs−/−mice banded over a range of densities extending from that of eHAV to that of nonenveloped virions. We conclude that nonenveloped virions shed in feces are derived from eHAV released across the canalicular membrane and stripped of membranes by the detergent action of bile acids within the proximal biliary canaliculus.IMPORTANCEHAV is a hepatotropic, fecally/orally transmitted picornavirus that can cause severe hepatitis in humans. Recent work reveals that it has an unusual life cycle. Virus is found in cell culture supernatant fluids in two mature, infectious forms: one wrapped in membranes (quasi-enveloped) and another that is nonenveloped. Membrane-wrapped virions circulate in blood during acute infection and are resistant to neutralizing antibodies, likely facilitating HAV dissemination within the liver. On the other hand, virus shed in feces is nonenveloped and highly stable, facilitating epidemic spread and transmission to naive hosts. Factors controlling the biogenesis of these two distinct forms of the virus in infected humans are not understood. Here we characterize vectorial release of quasi-enveloped virions from polarized epithelial cell cultures and provide evidence that bile acids strip membranes from eHAV following its secretion into the biliary tract. These results enhance our understanding of the life cycle of this unusual picornavirus.


2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (17) ◽  
pp. 7864-7871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Borman ◽  
Yanne M. Michel ◽  
Katherine M. Kean

ABSTRACT The hepatitis A virus (HAV) internal ribosome entry segment (IRES) is unique among the picornavirus IRESs in that it is inactive in the presence of either the entero- and rhinovirus 2A or aphthovirus Lb proteinases. Since these proteinases both cleave eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) and HAV IRES activity could be rescued in vitro by addition of eIF4F to proteinase-treated extracts, it was concluded that the HAV IRES requires eIF4F containing intact eIF4G. Here, we show that the inability of the HAV IRES to function with cleaved eIF4G cannot be attributed to inefficient binding of the cleaved form of eIF4G by the HAV IRES. Indeed, the binding of both intact eIF4F and the C-terminal cleavage product of eIF4G to the HAV IRES was virtually indistinguishable from their binding to the encephalomyocarditis virus IRES, as assessed by UV cross-linking and filter retention assays. Rather, we show that HAV IRES activity requires, either directly or indirectly, components of the eIF4F complex which interact with the N-terminal fragment of eIF4G. Effectively, HAV IRES activity, but not that of the human rhinovirus IRES, was sensitive to the rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP3 [which displaces poly(A)-binding protein from the eIF4F complex], to recombinant eIF4E-binding protein (which prevents the association of the cap binding protein eIF4E with eIF4G), and to cap analogue.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1167-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Paula ◽  
A. S. Perse ◽  
L. A. Amado ◽  
L. M. Morais ◽  
S. M. B. Lima ◽  
...  

Virology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 198 (2) ◽  
pp. 524-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tesar ◽  
Inga Pak ◽  
Xi-Yu Jia ◽  
Oliver C. Richards ◽  
Donald F. Summers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document