NOM removal by adsorption onto granular ferric hydroxide: Equilibrium, kinetics, filter and regeneration studies

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 238-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Genz ◽  
Benno Baumgarten ◽  
Mandy Goernitz ◽  
Martin Jekel
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Bahr ◽  
Lukas Massa ◽  
Helge Stanjek ◽  
Martin Jekel ◽  
Aki Sebastian Ruhl

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Reinhardt ◽  
M. Gómez Elordi ◽  
R. Minke ◽  
H. Schönberger ◽  
E. Rott

Abstract Phosphonates are widely used in various industries. It is desirable to remove them before discharging phosphonate-containing wastewater. This study describes a large number of batch experiments with adsorbents that are likely suitable for the removal of phosphonates. For this, adsorption isotherms for four different granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorbents were determined at different pH values in order to identify the best performing material. Additionally, the influence of temperature was studied for this GFH. A maximum loading for nitrilotrimethylphosphonic acid (NTMP) was found to be ∼12 mg P/g with an initial concentration of 1 mg/L NTMP-P and a contact time of 7 days at room temperature. Then, the adsorption of six different phosphonates was investigated as a function of pH. It was shown that GFH could be used to remove all investigated phosphonates from water and, with an increasing pH, the adsorption capacity decreased for all six phosphonates. Finally, five adsorption–desorption cycles were carried out to check the suitability of the material for multiple re-use. Even after five cycles, the adsorption process still performed well.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Driehaus

The reduced German drinking water standard for arsenic of 10 μg/L initiated the development of a new adsorbent, the granular ferric hydroxide. It was introduced into the market in 1997 under the trade name GEH®. 16 drinking water treatment plants for arsenic removal are now using this technique in Germany. The article gives a brief overview over this applications, the design data and the treatment results. This technique requires only small contact times between 3 and 10 minutes, whereas the treatment capacities are up to 250,000 bed volumes. The average treatment costs, including media supply, media exchange service and disposal, are 0.04 EURO per m3 treated water.


2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 821-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E.B. Fleming ◽  
Isadel S. Eddy ◽  
Mihai R. Gherase ◽  
Meaghan K. Gibbons ◽  
Graham A. Gagnon

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Kumar ◽  
Amit Bhatnagar ◽  
Minkyu Ji ◽  
Woosik Jung ◽  
Sang-Hun Lee ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 159 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 84-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Kumar ◽  
Amit Bhatnagar ◽  
Jeong-A Choi ◽  
Umesh Kumar ◽  
Booki Min ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document