Fit-for-purpose treatment of produced water with iron and polymeric coagulant for reuse in hydraulic fracturing: Temperature effects on aggregation and high-rate sedimentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 115330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahith Nadella ◽  
Ramesh Sharma ◽  
Shankararaman Chellam
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Sharma ◽  
Kristie McLin ◽  
Kevin Bjornen ◽  
Austin Shields ◽  
Zakir Hirani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Ramniklal Gondalia ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Abhishek Shende ◽  
Amay Kumar Jha ◽  
Dinesh Choudhary ◽  
...  

Abstract From 2005 to 2020, the application of hydraulic fracturing technology in India has touched the length and breadth of the country in almost every basin and reservoir section. The variety of reservoirs and operating environment present in India governed this evolution over the past 15 years resulting in a different fit for purpose fracturing strategy for each basin varying from conventional single-stage fracturing (urban, desert & remote forested regions) to high volume multi-stage fracturing, deepwater frac-packs and offshore ultra-HPHT fracturing. The objective of this paper is to present the milestones along this evolution journey for hydraulic fracturing treatments in India from 2005 to 2020. This paper begins with a review of published industry literature from 2005 to 2020 categorized by reservoir type and the proven economical techno-operational fracturing strategy adopted during that period. The milestones are covered chronologically since the success or failure of technology application in one basin often influenced the adoption of novel hydraulic fracturing methods in other basins or by other operators during the initial years. The offshore evolution is branched between the west and the east coasts which have distinctly different journeys and challenges. The onshore evolution is split into 5 categories: Cambay onshoreBarmer Hills & Tight GasEast India CBM and shale gasAssam-Arakan BasinOnshore KG Basin Each of these regions is at different stages of evolution. The Barmer region is in the most advanced state of evolution with frac factories in place while the Assam-Arakan Basin is in a relatively nascent stage. Figure 1 presents estimated hydraulic stage count based on published literature underlining the exponential growth in hydraulic fracturing activity in India. This paper enlists the technical and operational challenges present in the onshore and offshore categories mentioned above along with the identified novel techno-operational strategies which have proven to be successful for various operators in India. A comparison is presented of the different timelines of the exploration-appraisal-development journey for each region based on the economic viability of fracturing solutions available today in the Industry. Lastly, specific non-technical challenges related to available infrastructure, logistics and social governance are discussed for each region. This paper concludes by identifying the next step-change in the evolution of hydraulic fracturing operations in India among the 5 categories. Each of Government, operators and service providers have important roles to play in expanding the adoption of this technology in India. These roles are discussed for each identified category with the perspective of continuing the country's journey towards energy security.


Chemosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 898-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Mohammad-Pajooh ◽  
Dirk Weichgrebe ◽  
Graham Cuff ◽  
Babak Mohamadpour Tosarkani ◽  
Karl-Heinz Rosenwinkel

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Boyun Guo

Abstract Frac-driven interactions (FDIs) often lead to sharp decline in gas and oil production rates of wells in shale gas/oil reservoirs. How to minimize the FDI is an open problem in the oil and gas industry. Xiao et al.’s (2019, “An Analytical Model for Describing Sequential Initiation and Simultaneous Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Hydraulic Fracturing Shale Oil/Gas Formations,” Energy Sci Eng., 7(5), pp. 1514–1526.) analytical model for two-fracture systems was extended in this study to obtain a general model for handling multiple fractures. The general model was used to identify engineering factors affecting the maximum permissible stage fluid injection time for minimizing FDI. On the basis of model results obtained, we found that increasing fluid injection rate can create more short fractures and thus increase the maximum permissible stage injection time before FDI occurs. Use of dilatant type of fracturing fluid (n > 1) can reduce the growth of long fractures, promote the creation of more short fractures, and thus increase the maximum permissible stage injection time before FDI occurs. It is also expected that injecting dilatant type of fracturing fluid at high rate will allow for longer injection time and thus larger injection volume, resulting in larger stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) with higher fracture intensity and thus higher well productivity and hydrocarbon recovery factor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document