An Assessment of the Key Predictors of Perioperative Complications in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing Surgical Treatment: Results from a Survey of 916 AOSpine International Members

2015 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Tetreault ◽  
Aria Nouri ◽  
Anoushka Singh ◽  
Mike Fawcett ◽  
Anick Nater ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Fehlings ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Branko Kopjar ◽  
Paul M. Arnold ◽  
S. Tim Yoon ◽  
...  

Object Rates of complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) are not clear. Appreciating these risks is important for patient counseling and quality improvement. The authors sought to assess the rates of and risk factors associated with perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of CSM. Methods Data from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study, a prospective, multicenter study, were analyzed. Outcomes data, including adverse events, were collected in a standardized manner and externally monitored. Rates of perioperative complications (within 30 days of surgery) and delayed complications (31 days to 2 years following surgery) were tabulated and stratified based on clinical factors. Results The study enrolled 302 patients (mean age 57 years, range 29–86) years. Of 332 reported adverse events, 73 were classified as perioperative complications (25 major and 48 minor) in 47 patients (overall perioperative complication rate of 15.6%). The most common perioperative complications included minor cardiopulmonary events (3.0%), dysphagia (3.0%), and superficial wound infection (2.3%). Perioperative worsening of myelopathy was reported in 4 patients (1.3%). Based on 275 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up, there were 14 delayed complications (8 minor, 6 major) in 12 patients, for an overall delayed complication rate of 4.4%. Of patients treated with anterior-only (n = 176), posterior-only (n = 107), and combined anterior-posterior (n = 19) procedures, 11%, 19%, and 37%, respectively, had 1 or more perioperative complications. Compared with anterior-only approaches, posterior-only approaches had a higher rate of wound infection (0.6% vs 4.7%, p = 0.030). Dysphagia was more common with combined anterior-posterior procedures (21.1%) compared with anterior-only procedures (2.3%) or posterior-only procedures (0.9%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of C-5 radiculopathy was not associated with the surgical approach (p = 0.8). The occurrence of perioperative complications was associated with increased age (p = 0.006), combined anterior-posterior procedures (p = 0.016), increased operative time (p = 0.009), and increased operative blood loss (p = 0.005), but it was not associated with comorbidity score, body mass index, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, smoking status, anterior-only versus posterior-only approach, or specific procedures. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with minor or major complications identified age (OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.002–1.057, p = 0.035) and operative time (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.002–1.008, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis of factors associated with major complications identified age (OR 1.054, 95% CI 1.015–1.094, p = 0.006) and combined anterior-posterior procedures (OR 5.297, 95% CI 1.626–17.256, p = 0.006). Conclusions For the surgical treatment of CSM, the vast majority of complications were treatable and without long-term impact. Multivariate factors associated with an increased risk of complications include greater age, increased operative time, and use of combined anterior-posterior procedures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1167
Author(s):  
Ismail Yuce ◽  
Okan Kahyaoglu ◽  
Muzeyyen Ataseven ◽  
Halit Cavusoglu ◽  
Yunus Aydin

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos ◽  
Héctor R. Martínez-Ríos ◽  
Francisco López-Meléndez ◽  
Carla L. García-Ramos ◽  
Luis M. Rosales-Olivarez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 923-927
Author(s):  
Roman I. Trutiak

Introduction: Stroke is a big social problem. The expediency of surgical treatment is justified as the chances for complete reconvalescence of the neurological deficiency increase. The aim: To analyze available sources of scientific information on the terms of surgical treatment of patients with acute neurological deficiency. Materials and methods: We analyzed 41 English publications in PubMed for 5 years from 2012 to 2017, with the keywords “urgent carotid endarterectomy” and “early carotid endarterectomy”. Conclusions: In the classic course of stroke or TIA, the best treatment results are obtained when the CEA is performed 3-7 days after the marker event. CEA should be performed as soon as possible to restore brain revascularization and prevent the fatal progression of the neurological deficiency after crescendo TIA or stroke-in-evolution, despite the fact that the risk of complications and disability after surgery may be higher than 6%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document