Perspective on “The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Gross Total Resection of Atypical Meningiomas”

2015 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Veeravagu ◽  
Tej D. Azad ◽  
Steven D. Chang
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Gross Total Resection of Atypical Meningiomas

2015 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 808-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaakir Hasan ◽  
Michael Young ◽  
Trevine Albert ◽  
Ashish H. Shah ◽  
Christian Okoye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

scholarly journals Determining the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of meningioma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav K. Reddy ◽  
James S. Ryoo ◽  
Steven Denyer ◽  
Laura S. McGuire ◽  
Ankit I. Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Atypical Meningioma ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Cause Specific Survival ◽  
End Results

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to illustrate the demographic characteristics of meningioma patients and observe the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on survival by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. More specifically, the authors aimed to answer the question of whether adjuvant radiotherapy following resection of atypical meningioma confers a cause-specific survival benefit. Additionally, they attempted to add to previous characterizations of the epidemiology of primary meningiomas and assess the effectiveness of the standard of care for benign and anaplastic meningiomas. They also sought to characterize the efficacy of various treatment options in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas separately since nearly all other analyses have grouped these two together despite varying treatment regimens for these behavior categories.METHODSSEER data from 1973 to 2015 were queried using appropriate ICD-O-3 codes for benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment choices were analyzed. The effects of treatment were examined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.RESULTSA total of 57,998 patients were included in the analysis of demographic, meningioma, and treatment characteristics. Among this population, cases of unspecified WHO tumor grade were excluded in the multivariate analysis, leaving a total of 12,931 patients to examine outcomes among treatment paradigms. In benign meningiomas, gross-total resection (HR 0.289, p = 0.013) imparted a significant cause-specific survival benefit over no treatment. In anaplastic meningioma cases, adjuvant radiotherapy imparted a significant survival benefit following both subtotal (HR 0.089, p = 0.018) and gross-total (HR 0.162, p = 0.002) resection as compared to gross-total resection alone. In atypical tumors, gross-total resection plus radiotherapy did not significantly change the hazard risk (HR 1.353, p = 0.628) compared to gross-total resection alone. Similarly, it was found that adjuvant radiation did not significantly benefit survival after a subtotal resection (HR 1.440, p = 0.644).CONCLUSIONSThe results of this study demonstrate that the role of adjuvant radiotherapy, especially after the resection of atypical meningioma, remains somewhat unclear. Thus, given these results, prospective randomized clinical studies are warranted to provide clear information on the effects of adjuvant radiation in meningioma treatment.

The role of radiotherapy following gross-total resection of atypical meningiomas

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo J. Komotar ◽  
J. Bryan Iorgulescu ◽  
Daniel M. S. Raper ◽  
Eric C. Holland ◽  
Kathryn Beal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Strong Trend ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

Object Atypical (WHO Grade II) meningiomas comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors, with histopathology delineated under the guidance of the WHO and a spectrum of clinical outcomes. The role of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with atypical meningiomas who have undergone gross-total resection (GTR) remains unclear. In this paper, the authors sought to clarify this role by reviewing their experience over the past 2 decades. Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed all patients at their institution who underwent GTR between 1992 and 2011 with a final histology demonstrating atypical meningioma. Information regarding patients, tumor characteristics, and postoperative adjuvant therapy was gleaned from medical records. Time to recurrence and overall survival were analyzed using univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Results Forty-five patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent GTR for atypical meningiomas. By a median follow-up of 44.1 months, 22% of atypical meningiomas had recurred. There was no recurrence in 12 (92%) of 13 patients who received postoperative radiotherapy or in 19 (59%) of 32 patients who did not undergo postoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.085), demonstrating a strong trend toward improved local control with postoperative radiotherapy. No other factors were significantly associated with recurrence in univariate or multivariate analyses. Conclusions This retrospective series supports the observation that postoperative radiotherapy likely results in lower recurrence rates of gross totally resected atypical meningiomas. Although a multicenter prospective trial will ultimately be needed to fully define the role of radiotherapy in managing gross totally resected atypical meningiomas, the authors' results contribute to a growing number of series that support routine postoperative radiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for these lesions.

scholarly journals The impact of authors’ medical specialty on publication patterns and published results of adjuvant radiotherapy for WHO grade 2 meningiomas—a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Sveino Strand ◽  
Ole Solheim
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Radiation Oncologist ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The role of adjuvant radiotherapy after gross total resection (GTR) of WHO grade 2 meningioma remains unclear, and conflicting results have been published. We hypothesized that authors’ medical specialties could be associated with reported findings on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after GTR of WHO grade 2 meningiomas. Method A systematic review was conducted in Embase and Medline databases, in addition to screening of all relevant bibliographies. Articles including patients aged 18 years or older, with histologically confirmed WHO grade 2 meningioma, were included. We extracted data on medical subspecialties using the author list. We registered study design, median follow-up, number of included patients, WHO classification in use, and years of study inclusion. Results Thirty-seven relevant studies were identified, where 34 (92%) were retrospective cohort studies, two studies (5%) were systematic reviews, and one study (3%) was a meta-analysis. If the last author was a radiation-oncologist, the study was more likely to favor adjuvant radiotherapy, and if a neurosurgeon was last author, the study was more likely to not advocate adjuvant radiotherapy (p=0.009). There was no significant association between study result and whether the study was published in a neurosurgical or oncological journal (p=0.802). There was no significant difference in follow-up time, years of inclusion, or number of included patients between studies favoring or not favoring adjuvant radiotherapy. Conclusions In this systematic review of the literature, we found that if a radiation-oncologist was the last author of the study, the study was more likely to favor adjuvant radiotherapy after gross total resection of WHO grade 2 meningioma. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of a possible genealogy bias in the neuro-oncological literature.

Revisiting Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Gross Total Resection of World Health Organization Grade II Meningioma

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 655-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Graffeo ◽  
Heather E. Leeper ◽  
Avital Perry ◽  
Joon H. Uhm ◽  
Daniel J. Lachance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Health Organization

Endoscopic Resection of Hemorrhaged Third Ventricle Cavernous Malformation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. E51-E51
Author(s):  
Giorgio Palandri ◽  
Thomas Sorenson ◽  
Mino Zucchelli ◽  
Nicola Acciarri ◽  
Paolo Mantovani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard ◽  
Intraventricular Hemorrhage ◽  
Cavernous Malformation ◽  
Third Ventricle ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Vascular Lesions ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Cavernous Malformations ◽  
The Third

Abstract Cavernous malformations of the third ventricle are uncommon vascular lesions. Evidence suggests that cavernous malformations in this location might have a more aggressive natural history due to their risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus.1 The gold standard of treatment is considered to be microsurgical gross total resection of the lesion. However, with progressive improvement in endoscopic capabilities, several authors have recently advocated for the role of minimally-invasive neuroendoscopy for resecting intraventricular cavernous malformations.2-4 In this timely intraoperative video, we demonstrate the gross total resection of a third ventricle cavernous malformation that presented with hemorrhage via a right-sided trans-frontal neuroendoscopic approach.

Tumor control after surgery for spinal myxopapillary ependymomas: distinct outcomes in adults versus children

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Feldman ◽  
Aaron J. Clark ◽  
Michael Safaee ◽  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
Andrew T. Parsa
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Cauda Equina ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Who Grade

Object Myxopapillary ependymomas (MPEs) are rare WHO Grade I tumors found in the conus medullaris, cauda equina, and filum terminale. Treatment generally consists of resection with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for surgical management are lacking due to the rarity of this tumor. Methods An English-language PubMed search was performed using the key words “myxopapillary” and “ependymoma.” Reports describing fewer than 3 patients or those lacking data on the extent of resection or radiotherapy were excluded. A total of 28 articles describing 475 patients met the authors' inclusion criteria. Patients were grouped by extent of resection and whether or not they underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Differences in recurrence rates were assessed by chi-square test. Results The overall recurrence rate was 15.5% in patients treated by gross-total resection (GTR) and 32.6% in patients treated by subtotal resection (STR), irrespective of whether they underwent adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001). Regardless of the extent of resection, adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with a decrease in recurrence rates. The overall recurrence rate was 15.6% in patients who underwent GTR and radiotherapy compared with 15.9% in patients who underwent GTR alone (p = 0.58), and it was 29.3% in patients who underwent STR and radiotherapy compared with 35.1% in those who underwent STR alone (p = 0.53). The difference between recurrence rates for patients who underwent GTR alone versus STR and radiotherapy was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher recurrence rates in pediatric patients compared with adults (40.5% vs 23.4%, respectively; p = 0.02). Even in the setting of GTR alone, recurrence rates were higher in pediatric patients (65% vs 7.6%; p < 0.001). Conclusions Gross-total resection alone is associated with decreased recurrence rates compared with STR with or without radiotherapy. The authors' results suggest that treatment goals should include attempted GTR whenever possible. The observation that children benefitted from radiation therapy to a greater extent than did adults suggests that biological differences between tumors in these patient populations warrants more rigorous scientific studies.

The impact of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery on atypical meningioma recurrence following aggressive microsurgical resection

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Hardesty ◽  
Andrew B. Wolf ◽  
David G. Brachman ◽  
Heyoung L. McBride ◽  
Emad Youssef ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Microsurgical Resection ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

Object Patients with atypical meningioma often undergo gross-total resection (GTR) at initial presentation, but the role of adjuvant radiation therapy remains unclear. The increasing prevalence of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the modern neurosurgical era has led to the use of routine postoperative radiation therapy in the absence of evidence-based guidelines. This study sought to define the long-term recurrence rate of atypical meningiomas and identify the value of SRS in affecting outcome. Methods The authors identified 228 patients with microsurgically treated atypical meningiomas who underwent a total of 257 resections at the Barrow Neurological Institute over the last 20 years. Atypical meningiomas were diagnosed according to current WHO criteria. Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively. Results Median clinical and radiographic follow-up was 52 months. Gross-total resection, defined as Simpson Grade I or II resection, was achieved in 149 patients (58%). The median proliferative index was 6.9% (range 0.4%–20.6%). Overall 51 patients (22%) demonstrated tumor recurrence at a median of 20.2 months postoperatively. Seventy-one patients (31%) underwent adjuvant radiation postoperatively, with 32 patients (14%) receiving adjuvant SRS and 39 patients (17%) receiving adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The recurrence rate for patients receiving SRS was 25% (8/32) and for IMRT was 18% (7/39), which was not significantly different from the overall group. Gross-total resection was predictive of progression-free survival (PFS; relative risk 0.255, p < 0.0001), but postoperative SRS was not associated with improved PFS in all patients or in only those with subtotal resections. Conclusions Atypical meningiomas are increasingly irradiated, even after complete or near-complete microsurgical resection. This analysis of the largest patient series to date suggests that close observation remains reasonable in the setting of aggressive microsurgical resection. Although postoperative adjuvant SRS did not significantly affect tumor recurrence rates in this experience, a larger cohort study with longer follow-up may reveal a therapeutic benefit in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document