Patient Education and Engagement Through Multimedia: A Prospective Pilot Study on Health Literacy in Patients with Cerebral Aneurysms

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. e819-e826
Author(s):  
Nitin Agarwal ◽  
Ray Funahashi ◽  
Tavis Taylor ◽  
Ahmed Jorge ◽  
Rafey Feroze ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 566.1-566
Author(s):  
S. Afilal ◽  
H. Rkain ◽  
B. Berchane ◽  
J. Moulay Berkchi ◽  
S. Fellous ◽  
...  

Background:Methotrexate is a gold standard for treatment of RA. In our context, RA patients prefer to be injected by paramedics rather than self-injecting. This can be explained by patients’ bad perceptions of self-injection or lack of information. Appropriate self-injection education can therefore be an important element in overcoming these obstacles and improving disease self-management.Objectives:Compare the RA patients’ perceptions on methotrexate self-injection before and after a patient education session.Methods:Prospective pilot study that included 27 consecutive patients (81.5% female, mean age 44.4 years, illiteracy rate 40.7%) with RA (median duration of progression of 4 years, mean delay in referral for specialist of 6 months, median duration of methotrexate use of 1 year). The patients benefited from an individual patient education session to learn how to self-inject with methotrexate subcutaneously. The patient education session was supervised by a nurse and a rheumatologist with a control a week later. Perceptions of the reluctance to self-inject and the difficulties encountered by patients were assessed before the patient education session, after the 1st and 2nd self-injection of methotrexate using a 10 mm visual analog scale. Patients also reported their level of satisfaction (10 mm VAS) after the 1st and 2nd self-injection.Results:The mean duration of patient education session is 13 min.Table I compares the evolution of the degrees of reluctance to self-injection, the difficulties encountered, and the satisfaction experienced by the patients.Table 1.Evolution of RA patients’ perceptions on the methotrexate self-injection. (N = 27)BeforeAfter the 1stself-injectionAfter the 2end self-injectionpVAS reluctance (0-10mm)6,5 ± 3,62,2 ± 2,91,0 ± 2,3<0,0001VAS difficulty (0-10mm)7,5 ± 2,62,5 ± 2,71,0 ± 1,9<0,0001VAS satisfaction (0-10mm)-8,9 ± 1,89,5 ± 1,50,002Conclusion:This study suggests the effectiveness of a methotrexate self-injection patient education session in RA patients. It also highlights the value of patient education in rheumatologic care. A large-scale study is necessary to better interpret and complete these preliminary results from this pilot study.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 565.1-566
Author(s):  
S. Afilal ◽  
H. Rkain ◽  
B. Berchane ◽  
J. Moulay Berkchi ◽  
S. Fellous ◽  
...  

Background:Patient education for RA patients has been shown to improve adherence and self-management of this chronic disease.Objectives:To assess the impact of illiteracy on assimilation of a patient education session on methotrexate self-injection in RA patients.Methods:Prospective pilot study that included 27 consecutive patients (81.5% female, mean age 44.4 years, illiteracy rate 40.7%) with RA (median duration of progression of 4 years, mean delay in referral for specialist of 6 months, median duration of methotrexate use of 1 year). The patients benefited from an individual patient education session to learn how to self-inject with methotrexate subcutaneously. The patient education session was supervised by a nurse and a rheumatologist. A 10-question dichotomous questionnaire was then administered to patients to assess the level of uptake of messages passed during the patient education session. The prevalence of correct answers was compared between illiterate and non-illiterate patients.Results:The mean duration of patient education session is 13 min.Table I illustrates the results of the correct responses prevalence and the comparison of correct response rates between illiterate and non-illiterate patients.Table 1.Prevalence of correct responses and comparison of correct response rates between illiterate and non-illiterate patients.QuestionsN=27IlliteratePYes (N=11)No (N=16)1.Do I always have to self-inject on the same day of the week? (%)96,390,9100NS2.Should Methotrexate be protected from light and away from children? (%)96,310093,7NS3.Can I self-inject anywhere on my thigh and belly 5 cm from the navel? (%)85,210075NS4.Is it important to change the injection sites? (%)70,472,768,75NS5.Do I need to pinch the skin before self-injection? (%)92,610087,5NS6.Can I always use the same needle for each injection? (%)81,590,975NS7.Do I have to wear gloves to inject Methotrexate? (%)81,590,975NS8.Do I have to apply an antiseptic product (alcohol, Betadine) to the injection site before self-injecting? (%)88,990,987,5NS9.Can I use the rest of the MTX ampoule for the next injection? (%)74,181,868,7NS10.Do I tell my doctor if I have side effects? (%)100100100NSConclusion:This study suggests that illiteracy does not affect the assimilation of information given during a patient education session. These preliminary results should encourage the development of patient education programs in our context where illiteracy rate is high.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelos Kyriacou ◽  
Alexis Kyriacou ◽  
Akheel A Syed ◽  
Petros Perros

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document