scholarly journals Specialist physicians’ referral behavior regarding preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene disorders: Is there room to grow?

F&S Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Capelouto ◽  
Melanie Evans ◽  
Jennifer Shannon ◽  
Katelyn Jetelina ◽  
Orhan Bukulmez ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e429
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Capelouto ◽  
Melanie Evans ◽  
Jennifer Shannon ◽  
Katelyn Jetelina ◽  
Orhan Bukulmez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Brindha Bavan ◽  
Amin A. Milki

In addition to the potential for multiple pregnancy, spontaneous conception during in vitro fertilization (IVF) can lead to undesired genetic outcomes. We present a case of a patient undergoing IVF with the intention of subsequent frozen embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Unprotected intercourse 6 days prior to egg retrieval resulted in a spontaneous pregnancy before the opportunity for embryo transfer. This case report highlights that spontaneous conception during IVF compromises the ability to transfer embryos that are euploid, unaffected by single gene disorders, or intended for gender balancing within a family when desired.


Author(s):  
Margaret Lock

This chapter begins with a brief consideration of the anthropological literature on divination. This is followed by a condensed discussion composed primarily of ethnographic research findings about the responses of individuals and their families to genetic testing for single gene disorders such as Huntington disease and to genetic testing for breast cancer. Throughout the analysis, the concepts of genetic body, geneticization, and biosociality are introduced. The chapter also presents an account of a National Institutes of Health randomized trial carried out with individuals whose families have one or more members diagnosed with Alzheimer disease (AD), and who have undergone genotyping for the susceptibility gene APOE. The findings in this account represent the first extensive analysis of the responses of individuals undergoing testing for a susceptibility gene.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1632-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
A W Tiegs ◽  
L Sun ◽  
G Patounakis ◽  
R T Scott

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does the reproductive potential of embryos change when blastocyst development takes longer than the traditionally accepted 5 days when accounting for aneuploidy and endometrial-embryo asynchrony? SUMMARY ANSWER Aneuploidy increases with increasing duration of blastulation, but if blastocyst morphologic quality and endometrial-embryo asynchrony are controlled for, euploid Day 7 embryos have similar sustained implantation as compared to Days 5 and 6 euploid blastocysts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The relative contributions of diminished embryo quality versus endometrial and embryo asynchrony to poor outcomes associated with embryos cultured past Day 6 are not clear. Asynchrony can be eliminated by embryo vitrification with transfer in a subsequent month after retrieval. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort study of patients from a single center attempting conception through ICSI and utilizing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy screening (PGT-A) from January 2017 to September 2018. Cycles were excluded if they utilized surgical sperm or preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic/single gene defects. ICSI cycle outcomes from 2586 patients were evaluated for ploidy status of embryos. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Only patients undergoing single, euploid frozen embryo transfer were included when analyzing cycle outcomes by day of blastocyst expansion of the transferred embryo (n = 2130). Ploidy rates by the day upon which an embryo was considered to be usable (denoted, ‘usable blastulation day’) were determined so as to assess the contribution of aneuploidy to slow embryo development. Outcomes of euploid frozen single embryo transfers (SET) of Day 7 embryos were evaluated to assess the reproductive potential associated with embryos that were slowly developing for reasons other than aneuploidy. Analyses were adjusted by maternal age and blastocyst morphology. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, 67.7% (n = 3508) of usable Day 5 blastocysts were euploid, 52.1% (n = 5560) of usable Day 6 blastocysts were euploid and 43.1% (n = 229) of usable Day 7 embryos were euploid (Day 5 versus Day 6: odds ratio (OR) 0.7 (95% CI, 0.64–0.76), P < 0.001; Day 5 versus Day 7: OR 0.56 (95% CI, 0.46–0.69), P < 0.001; Day 6 versus Day 7: OR 0.81 (95% CI, 0.67–0.99), P = 0.036). Stratified by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology maternal age groups, a reduction in the prevalence of euploidy by increasing time to embryo blastulation was still seen. The sustained implantation rate (SIR) was similar after euploid SET of Days 5 and 6 embryos (overall, 68.9% (95% CI, 66.0–71.6) and 66.8% (95% CI, 63.8–69.7), respectively; P = 0.81). SIR after euploid Day 7 SET appeared slightly lower than that of Days 5 and 6 embryos (52.6% (95% CI, 35.8–69.0); (Day 5 versus Day 7: OR, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.32–1.41), P = 0.29; Day 6 versus Day 7: OR 0.58 (95% CI, 0.28–1.2), P = 0.14)) but did not achieve statistical significance. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The primary limitation is the low number of Day 7 blastocyst transfers that limits statistical power. Additionally, the retrospective nature of this study may prevent full elucidation of potential biases with respect to culture, morphologic assessment and selection of Day 7 embryos for transfer. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Routine culture through Day 7 may successfully increase the pool of transferrable embryos for patients who would otherwise have no usable embryos if culture terminated on Day 6. This is particularly true for older patients (i.e. greater than 35 years of age), whose embryos take longer to blastulate and, therefore, are more susceptible to cycle cancelation. Additionally, as evidenced by an adequate overall SIR of 52.6% after euploid SET of Day 7 blastocysts, embryos developing to a usable blastocyst on Day 7 are likely within the ‘window of blastulation.’ STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document