Ovarian cancer patients selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. primary debulking surgery are not similar — A national cancer data base study

2014 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. 382-383
Author(s):  
G.S. Leiserowitz ◽  
J.F. Lin ◽  
A.I. Tergas ◽  
W.A. Cliby ◽  
R.E. Bristow
2016 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M. Hinchcliff ◽  
A. Melamed ◽  
J.T. Clemmer ◽  
J.O. Schorge ◽  
A. Goodman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 539-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumer K. Wallace ◽  
Jeff F. Lin ◽  
William A. Cliby ◽  
Gary S. Leiserowitz ◽  
Ana I. Tergas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 668-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taymaa May ◽  
Robyn Comeau ◽  
Ping Sun ◽  
Joanne Kotsopoulos ◽  
Steven A. Narod ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe management of women with advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer includes a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The choice of treatment with primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies by institution. The objective of this study was to report 5-year survival outcomes for ovarian cancer patients treated at a single institution with primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsThis study included a retrospective chart review of 303 patients with stage IIIC or IV serous ovarian carcinoma diagnosed in Calgary, Canada. The patients were categorized into 1 of the 2 treatment arms: primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year ovarian cancer–specific survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves.ResultsAmong the 303 eligible patients, 142 patients (47%) underwent primary debulking surgery, and 161 patients (53%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five-year survival was better for patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (39%) than for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (27%; P = 0.02). Women with no residual disease experienced better overall survival than those with any residual disease (47% vs. 26%, respectively; P = 0.0002). This difference was significant for those who had primary debulking surgery (P = 0.0004) but not for the patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.09). Women who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy had better overall survival as compared with patients who received intravenous chemotherapy (44% vs 30%, respectively; P = 0.002).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that among women with no residual disease, survival is better among those who undergo primary debulking surgery than treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The latter should be reserved for women who are deemed not to be candidates for primary debulking surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document