Phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25: maintenance olaparib with bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab as standard of care

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
I. Ray-Coquard
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Efficacy of maintenance olaparib for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer patients (pts) by BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in the phase III SOLO1 trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5551-5551
Author(s):  
Michael Friedlander ◽  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Byoung-Gie Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

5551 Background: In SOLO1 (NCT01844986), maintenance olaparib resulted in a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for newly diagnosed, BRCA1- and/or BRCA2-mutated, advanced ovarian cancer pts compared with placebo (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.23–0.41; median not reached vs 13.8 months; Moore et al. N Engl J Med 2018). We investigated PFS in SOLO1 for the subgroups of pts with BRCA1 mutations ( BRCA1m) or BRCA2 mutations ( BRCA2m). Methods: All pts were in clinical complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy and were randomized to maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily; tablets) or placebo. After 2 years, pts with no evidence of disease discontinued study treatment, but pts with evidence of disease could continue study treatment. PFS by BRCAm was a predefined analysis. BRCAm were identified by central germline (Myriad or BGI) or local testing; Foundation Medicine testing confirmed tumor BRCAm. Results: Median follow-up for PFS was ~41 months in the olaparib and placebo arms. Of 391 randomized pts, 282 had BRCA1m (72%), 106 had BRCA2m (27%) and three (1%) had both (Table). Two pts in the olaparib arm had somatic BRCAm (one BRCA1m, one BRCA2m); all others had germline BRCAm. At the primary data cut-off, 155 pts in the BRCA1-mutated group (55%), 43 in the BRCA2-mutated group (41%) and none in the BRCA1/2 -mutated group had disease progression. The percentage of BRCA1-mutated pts who received olaparib and were progression-free at 1, 2 and 3 years was 86%, 69% and 53% (vs 52%, 36% and 26% receiving placebo) and for BRCA2-mutated pts was 92%, 85% and 80% (vs 50%, 32% and 29%, respectively). Conclusions: Significant PFS benefit with olaparib versus placebo was demonstrated for all pts, regardless of whether they had BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Statistical tests were not used to compare BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated pts, but those with BRCA2m appeared to receive greater benefit from maintenance olaparib than those with BRCA1m. Clinical trial information: NCT01844986. [Table: see text]

Use of First-Line PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Ursula Hasler-Strub
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Front Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of advanced ovarian cancer treatment. However, up to 85% of the patients experience recurrence under these settings. To fill this gap, novel front-line treatment strategies have been established, leading to unprecedented clinical benefits. For example, first-line bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent, plus chemotherapy followed by bevacizumab maintenance, has emerged as a new standard of care for newly diagnosed high risk ovarian cancer patients. This was based on the results of the phase III GOG 0218 and ICON-7 trials. More recently, poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including niraparib, olaparib and veliparib, have offered a new treatment option as part of the front-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Here we provide an overview of three recent studies that may lead to a paradigm shift in the first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

Real-world patterns and predictors of first-line maintenance use among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: Is there an opportunity for change?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18710-e18710
Author(s):  
Jinan Liu ◽  
Premal H. Thaker ◽  
Janvi Sah ◽  
Eric M. Maiese ◽  
Oscar Bee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Receive Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
To Receive

e18710 Background: With the advent of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), options for first-line (1L) maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer (OC) have evolved in the US. This study described the use of 1L maintenance and assessed predictors of 1L maintenance use among PARPi-eligible patients (pts) with OC in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV epithelial OC who received 6–9 cycles of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and primary or interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy between Jan 1, 2016, and Feb 29, 2020, from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database. The end of the last cycle of 1L PBC was defined as the index date. Those pts who started second-line chemotherapy within 2 months of the index date were excluded. Logistic regression was used to analyze variables with regard to 1L maintenance use. Results: In total, 463 pts were included; 21% received maintenance therapy, 79% received active surveillance. Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. Overall maintenance therapy use increased over the study period, from 7.7% to 37.7%. Pts with BRCA wild type were significantly less likely to receive maintenance therapy (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16–0.59) than pts with BRCA mutation. Pts treated in 2018 (OR: 2.73; 95% CI, 1.25–5.98) and 2019 (OR: 8.78; 95% CI, 4.15–18.55) were significantly more likely to receive maintenance therapy than pts treated in 2017. Age, race, practice type, ECOG score, and residual disease status were not significant predictors of 1L maintenance use. Conclusions: Nearly 40% of pts with advanced stage OC received upfront maintenance therapy with an increasing trend over time, particularly in those with biomarker guidance. Research is warranted toward addressing barriers to the appropriate use of maintenance therapy.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document