Harvesting and Implanting Allograft Bone

AORN Journal ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Carter
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. e140-e144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Murphy ◽  
Michael P. Glotzbecker ◽  
Michael T. Hresko ◽  
Daniel Hedequist

1999 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Leunig ◽  
Thomas J Demhartner ◽  
Axel Sckell ◽  
Christian R Fraitzl ◽  
Nicola Gries ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 843-846
Author(s):  
Harry B Skinner
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fölsch ◽  
Wolfram Mittelmeier ◽  
Uwe Bilderbeek ◽  
Nina Timmesfeld ◽  
Thomas von Garrel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (11) ◽  
pp. 1449-1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Green ◽  
S. C. Buckley ◽  
A. J. Hamer ◽  
R. M. Kerry ◽  
T. P. Harrison

Aims The management of acetabular defects at the time of revision hip arthroplasty surgery is a challenge. This study presents the results of a long-term follow-up study of the use of irradiated allograft bone in acetabular reconstruction. Patients and Methods Between 1990 and 2000, 123 hips in 110 patients underwent acetabular reconstruction for aseptic loosening, using impaction bone grafting with frozen, irradiated, and morsellized femoral heads and a cemented acetabular component. A total of 55 men and 55 women with a mean age of 64.3 years (26 to 97) at the time of revision surgery are included in this study. Results At a mean follow-up of 16.9 years, there had been 23 revisions (18.7%), including ten for infection, eight for aseptic loosening, and three for dislocation. Of the 66 surviving hips (58 patients) that could be reassessed, 50 hips (42 patients; 75.6%) were still functioning satisfactorily. Union of the graft had occurred in all hips with a surviving implant. Survival analysis for all indications was 80.6% at 15 years (55 patients at risk, 95% confidence interval (CI) 71.1 to 87.2) and 73.7% at 20 years (eight patients at risk, 95% CI 61.6 to 82.5). Conclusion Acetabular reconstruction using frozen, irradiated, and morsellized allograft bone and a cemented acetabular component is an effective method of treatment. It gives satisfactory long-term results and is comparable to other types of reconstruction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1449–54.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0000
Author(s):  
Samuel Adams ◽  
Travis Dekker ◽  
John Steele ◽  
Kamran Hamid

Category: Ankle,Ankle Arthritis,Basic Sciences/Biologics,Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Large lower extremity bony defects, complex foot and ankle deformities, and high-risk arthrodesis situations can be difficult to treat. These challenging pathologies, often require a critical-sizes and/or shaped structural bone void filler which may not be available with allograft bone. The advancement of 3D printing technology has allowed for the use of custom designed implants for foot and ankle surgery. This study reports on the radiographic and functional outcomes of a case series of patients treated with patient-specific 3D printed titanium implants. Methods: Seven consecutive patients who were treated with custom designed 3D printed implant cages for severe bone loss, deformity correction, and arthrodesis procedures were included in this study. A minimum of 1-year follow-up was required. No patients were lost to follow-up. Patients completed preoperative and most recent follow-up VAS for pain, FAAM, and SF-36 outcomes questionnaires. All patients had post-operative radiographs and CT scans to assess bony incorporation. Results: The mean age of these patients was 54.6 (35-73 years of age). The mean follow-up of these seven patients was 17.1 months (range 12 to 31). Radiographic fusion with cage ingrowth and integration occurred in all seven patients verified by CT scan. There was statistically significant improvement in all functional outcome score measures (VAS for pain, FAAM, and SF-36). All patients returned were satisfied with surgery. There were no failures. Case examples are demonstrated in Figure 1. Conclusion: This cohort of patients demonstrated the successful use of custom 3D printed implants to treat complex large bony defects, deformities and arthrodesis procedures of the lower extremity. These implants offer the surgeon a patient specific approach to treat both pain and deformity that is not necessarily available with allograft bone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document