Results of a national survey on ethics education in general surgery residency programs

1997 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc T. Downing ◽  
Dave P. Way ◽  
Donna A. Caniano
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e42-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Delisle ◽  
Justin Rivard ◽  
Pamela Hebbard ◽  
Brendan McCarthy ◽  
Debrah Wirtzfeld

Background: The benefits of mentorship on residents are well established. The current state of mentorship in General Surgery (GS) residency programs in Canada is unknown. The objectives of this study were to obtain GS residents’ and program directors’ (PD) perspectives on resident mentorship.Study Design: An electronic survey was developed and distributed to all 601 GS residents in Canada. All 17 PDs were invited for telephone interviews.Results: A total of 179 of the 601 residents responded. Ninety-seven percent (n=173) felt mentorship was important. Only 67% (n=116) identified a mentor and only 53% (n=62) reported a mentorship program. Most who identified a mentor (n=87/110, 79%) were satisfied with the mentorship received. Significant variations in mentorship existed between demographic subgroups and mentorship program types. Overall, residents (n=121, 74%) favoured having a required mentorship program.A total of 11 out of 17 PDs participated in the telephone interviews. The majority of PDs (n=9, 82%) were satisfied with current resident mentorship but most acknowledged that barriers exist (n=8, 73%).Conclusion: GS programs in Canada should ensure they are providing equal opportunities for mentorship across demographic subgroups. Programs are encouraged to examine both their program’s and their residents’ needs as well as local barriers to improve mentorship. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 102285
Author(s):  
Maxwell F. Kilcoyne ◽  
Garrett N. Coyan ◽  
Edgar Aranda-Michel ◽  
Arman Kilic ◽  
Victor O. Morell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110604
Author(s):  
James Shell Cox ◽  
Chase J. Wehrle ◽  
Christopher Mejias ◽  
Aditya K. Devarakonda ◽  
Jonathan Andrew McKenzie ◽  
...  

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted traditional resident recruitment practices, requiring virtual interviews and new forms of outreach. Social media, such as Twitter, is one tool programs can use to connect with applicants. This study sought to assess changes in Twitter use during the COVID-19 pandemic among general surgery programs. Methods Twitter and residency program websites were queried for public Twitter accounts related to general surgery residency programs. Publicly available tweets for available accounts were reviewed for all posts for the period March 15, 2019-November 25, 2020. Thematic analysis of each tweet was performed, and engagement was determined by likes and retweets on each tweet. Results The number of programs with active Twitter accounts increased after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, as did the number of tweets, likes-, and retweets-per-tweet. There was a significant increase in the number of tweets regarding resident promotion, program promotion, and virtual event promotion. Tweets received more likes-per-tweet if the subject was program promotion and resident promotion than tweets regarding virtual events. All results were statistically significant ( P < .05). Discussion Twitter use and engagement with residency programs have increased significantly since pandemic onset. Engagement is highest for tweets regarding program and resident promotion as measured by likes-per-tweet and highest for program promotion and virtual events as measured by retweets-per-tweet. Given the nearly nationwide increase in Twitter engagement after pandemic onset, programs should consider the impact of Twitter as a means of communication with applicants and program branding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Robert J. Conrad ◽  
Benjamin C. Clark ◽  
Dylan M. Russell ◽  
John S. Mayo ◽  
Fadi M. Balla ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. e109
Author(s):  
Susanna S. Hill ◽  
Steven T. Em ◽  
Robert J. McLoughlin ◽  
David C. Meyer ◽  
Cristina R. Harnsberger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna S. Hill ◽  
Fiona J. Dore ◽  
Steven T. Em ◽  
Robert J. McLoughlin ◽  
Allison S. Crawford ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 1179-1185
Author(s):  
Peter J. Abraham ◽  
Mackenzie N. Abraham ◽  
Britney L. Corey ◽  
Brenessa Lindeman ◽  
Herbert Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document