Projections from the red nucleus to the parvicellular reticular formation and the cervical spinal cord in the rat, with special reference to innervation by branching axons

2001 ◽  
Vol 923 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukihiko Yasui ◽  
Shigefumi Yokota ◽  
Katsuhiko Ono ◽  
Toshiko Tsumori
2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 2078-2112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Malick ◽  
Rew M. Strassman ◽  
Rami Burstein

Sensory information that arises in orofacial organs facilitates exploratory, ingestive, and defensive behaviors that are essential to overall fitness and survival. Because the hypothalamus plays an important role in the execution of these behaviors, sensory signals conveyed by the trigeminal nerve must be available to this brain structure. Recent anatomical studies have shown that a large number of neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord and caudal medulla project directly to the hypothalamus. The goal of the present study was to identify the types of information that these neurons carry to the hypothalamus and to map the route of their ascending axonal projections. Single-unit recording and antidromic microstimulation techniques were used to identify 81 hypothalamic-projecting neurons in the caudal medulla and upper cervical (C1) spinal cord that exhibited trigeminal receptive fields. Of the 72 neurons whose locations were identified, 54 were in laminae I–V of the dorsal horn at the level of C1 ( n = 22) or nucleus caudalis (Vc, n = 32) and were considered trigeminohypothalamic tract (THT) neurons because these regions are within the main projection territory of trigeminal primary afferent fibers. The remaining 18 neurons were in the adjacent lateral reticular formation (LRF) and were considered reticulohypothalamic tract (RHT) neurons. The receptive fields of THT neurons were restricted to the innervation territory of the trigeminal nerve and included the tongue and lips, cornea, intracranial dura, and vibrissae. Based on their responses to mechanical stimulation of cutaneous or intraoral receptive fields, the majority of THT neurons were classified as nociceptive (38% high-threshold, HT, 42% wide-dynamic-range, WDR), but in comparison to the spinohypothalamic tract (SHT), a relatively high percentage of low-threshold (LT) neurons were also found (20%). Responses to thermal stimuli were found more commonly in WDR than in HT neurons: 75% of HT and 93% of WDR neurons responded to heat, while 16% of HT and 54% of WDR neurons responded to cold. These neurons responded primarily to noxious intensities of thermal stimulation. In contrast, all LT neurons responded to innocuous and noxious intensities of both heat and cold stimuli, a phenomenon that has not been described for other populations of mechanoreceptive LT neurons at spinal or trigeminal levels. In contrast to THT neurons, RHT neurons exhibited large and complex receptive fields, which extended over both orofacial (“trigeminal”) and extracephalic (“non-trigeminal”) skin areas. Their responses to stimulation of trigeminal receptive fields were greater than their responses to stimulation of non-trigeminal receptive fields, and their responses to innocuous stimuli were induced only when applied to trigeminal receptive fields. As described for SHT axons, the axons of THT and RHT neurons ascended through the contralateral brain stem to the supraoptic decussation (SOD) in the lateral hypothalamus; 57% of them then crossed the midline to reach the ipsilateral hypothalamus. Collateral projections were found in the superior colliculus, substantia nigra, red nucleus, anterior pretectal nucleus, and in the lateral, perifornical, dorsomedial, suprachiasmatic, and supraoptic hypothalamic nuclei. Additional projections (which have not been described previously for SHT neurons) were found rostral to the hypothalamus in the caudate-putamen, globus pallidus, and substantia innominata. The findings that nonnociceptive signals reach the hypothalamus primarily through the direct THT route, whereas nociceptive signals reach the hypothalamus through both the direct THT and the indirect RHT routes suggest that highly prioritized painful signals are transferred in parallel channels to ensure that this critical information reaches the hypothalamus, a brain area that regulates homeostasis and other humoral responses required for the survival of the organism.


2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boubker Zaaimi ◽  
Lauren R. Dean ◽  
Stuart N. Baker

Coordinated movement requires patterned activation of muscles. In this study, we examined differences in selective activation of primate upper limb muscles by cortical and subcortical regions. Five macaque monkeys were trained to perform a reach and grasp task, and electromyogram (EMG) was recorded from 10 to 24 muscles while weak single-pulse stimuli were delivered through microelectrodes inserted in the motor cortex (M1), reticular formation (RF), or cervical spinal cord (SC). Stimulus intensity was adjusted to a level just above threshold. Stimulus-evoked effects were assessed from averages of rectified EMG. M1, RF, and SC activated 1.5 ± 0.9, 1.9 ± 0.8, and 2.5 ± 1.6 muscles per site (means ± SD); only M1 and SC differed significantly. In between recording sessions, natural muscle activity in the home cage was recorded using a miniature data logger. A novel analysis assessed how well natural activity could be reconstructed by stimulus-evoked responses. This provided two measures: normalized vector length L, reflecting how closely aligned natural and stimulus-evoked activity were, and normalized residual R, measuring the fraction of natural activity not reachable using stimulus-evoked patterns. Average values for M1, RF, and SC were L = 119.1 ± 9.6, 105.9 ± 6.2, and 109.3 ± 8.4% and R = 50.3 ± 4.9, 56.4 ± 3.5, and 51.5 ± 4.8%, respectively. RF was significantly different from M1 and SC on both measurements. RF is thus able to generate an approximation to the motor output with less activation than required by M1 and SC, but M1 and SC are more precise in reaching the exact activation pattern required. Cortical, brainstem, and spinal centers likely play distinct roles, as they cooperate to generate voluntary movements. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Brainstem reticular formation, primary motor cortex, and cervical spinal cord intermediate zone can all activate primate upper limb muscles. However, brainstem output is more efficient but less precise in producing natural patterns of motor output than motor cortex or spinal cord. We suggest that gross muscle synergies from the reticular formation are sculpted and refined by motor cortex and spinal circuits to reach the finely fractionated output characteristic of dexterous primate upper limb movements.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-279
Author(s):  
A. A. Khasanov ◽  
V. G. Malyshev

The obstetric birth injury is simulated on experimental animals (rats males). During the experiment it was proved that rotations and unbending of the animal's head can result in the trauma of the spinal cord, vertebral column, vertebral arteries, ischemic processes of the reticular formation, white substance of the brain. Neurologic symptomatology of traumatized animals resembles paresis of extremities or myatonic syndrome that are often found in infants. Traumatism of generally recognized obstetric methods is justified.


1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Rose ◽  
V. C. Abrahams

Experiments on chloralose-anaesthetized cats have shown that cells in the superior colliculus may be antidromically activated either from the pontomedullary reticular formation or the ventral cervical spinal cord, or from both sites. In tests on 111 units this has provided a basis for differentiating between cells of origin of the tectospinal tract and the tectoreticular system within the superior colliculus. Tectospinal cells may be activated both by spinal and pontine stimulation; tectoreticular cells cannot be activated by spinal stimulation. Both tectoreticular and tectospinal cells respond to visual and muscle afferent stimulation. The afferent connections may be strongly inhibitory as afferent input to the superior colliculus often prevented subsequent antidromic invasion. This was more commonly seen in tectospinal cells than tectoreticular cells. The distribution of the two cell populations within the superior colliculus was also found to be dissimilar. Evidence has also been obtained to suggest that the tectoreticular system, in part, consists of collaterals of the tectospinal tract.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 1223-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. N. Sholomenko ◽  
M. J. O'Donovan

1. We used an isolated preparation of the embryonic chick brain stem and spinal cord to examine the origin, trajectory, and effects of descending supraspinal pathways on lumbosacral motor activity. The in vitro preparation remained viable for < or 24 h and was sufficiently stable for electrophysiological, pharmacological, and neuroanatomic examination. In this preparation, as in the isolated spinal cord, spontaneous episodes of both forelimb and hindlimb motor activity occur in the absence of phasic afferent input. Motor activity can also be evoked by brain stem electrical stimulation or modulated by the introduction of neurochemicals to the independently perfused brain stem. 2. At embryonic day (E)6, lumbosacral motor activity could be evoked by brain stem electrical stimulation. At E5, neither brain stem nor spinal cord stimulation evoked activity in the lumbosacral spinal cord, although motoneurons did express spontaneous activity. 3. Lesion and electrophysiological studies indicated that axons traveling in the ventral cord mediated the activation of lumbosacral networks by brain stem stimulation. 4. Partition of the preparation into three separately perfused baths, using a zero-Ca2+ middle bath that encompassed the cervical spinal cord, demonstrated that the brain stem activation of spinal networks could be mediated by long-axoned pathways connecting the brain stem and lumbosacral spinal cord. 5. Using retrograde tracing from the spinal cord combined with brain stem stimulation, we found that the brain stem regions from which spinal activity could be evoked lie in the embryonic reticular formation close to neurons that send long descending axons to the lumbosacral spinal cord. The cells giving rise to these descending pathways are found in the ventral pontine and medullary reticular formation, a region that is the source of reticulospinal neurons important for motor activity in adult vertebrates. 6. Electrical recordings from this region revealed that the activity of some brain stem neurons was synchronized with the electrical activity of lumbosacral motoneurons during evoked or spontaneous episodes of rhythmic motor activity. 7. Both brain stem and spinal cord activity could be modulated by selective application of the glutamate agonist N-methyl-D-aspartate to the brain stem, supporting the existence of functionally active descending projections from the brain stem to the spinal cord. It is not yet clear what role the brain stem activity carried by these pathways has in the genesis and development of spinal cord motor activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document