Stimulation of BIT induces a circadian phase shift of locomotor activity in rats

2003 ◽  
Vol 976 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasukazu Nakahata ◽  
Nobuaki Okumura ◽  
Hiroto Otani ◽  
Juri Hamada ◽  
Tadahiro Numakawa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Peter Bracke ◽  
Eowyn Van de Putte ◽  
Wouter R. Ryckaert

Dose-response curves for circadian phase shift and melatonin suppression in relation to white or monochromatic nighttime illumination can be scaled to melanopic weighed illumination for normally constricted pupils, which makes them easier to interpret and compare. This is helpful for a practical applications.


1988 ◽  
Vol 85 (14) ◽  
pp. 5301-5304 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Johnson ◽  
L. Smale ◽  
R. Y. Moore ◽  
L. P. Morin

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Joyce ◽  
Manuel Spitschan ◽  
Jamie M. Zeitzer

AbstractThe human circadian system is exquisitely sensitive to light, through a pathway connecting the melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) to the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). ipRGCs are characterised by a delayed off-time following cessation of light exposure; we exploited this unusual physiologic property and examined how a sequence of flashes of bright light differing in intensity or duration presented in the biological night could delay the human circadian clock in vivo in healthy young participants (n=54). To understand the mechanism underlying circadian photoreception, we probed temporal integration by manipulating flash intensity and duration independently. In a 34-hour in-laboratory between-subjects design, we examined variable-intensity (3, 30, 95, 300, 950, 3000, or 9500 photopic lux; n=28 participants) flashes at fixed duration (2 ms), and variable-duration (10 μs, 100 μs, 1 ms, 10 ms, 100 ms, 1 sec, 10 sec) flashes at fixed intensity (2000 photopic lux; n=31 participants). We measured the phase shift of dim-light melatonin onset on the subsequent evening, and acute melatonin suppression and alertness during the flash sequence. In the variable-intensity study, we find a clear sigmoidal dose-response relationship for flash intensity and the induced circadian phase shift. In the variable-duration study, we find no parametric relationship between flash duration and induced circadian phase shift, indicating a relative insensitivity of the circadian system to flashes varying in duration. As the intermittent periods of darkness in our stimulation paradigm supports the recovery of extrinsic rod-cone signalling into the ipRGCs, our results strongly suggest rod-cone contributions into circadian photoreception.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1552-1564
Author(s):  
Jiawei Yin ◽  
Agung Julius ◽  
John T. Wen ◽  
Meeko M. K. Oishi ◽  
Lee K. Brown

SLEEP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A238-A238
Author(s):  
M S Rea ◽  
G Jones ◽  
P Hovareshti ◽  
D Tolani ◽  
A Bierman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin Lam ◽  
Min-Huey Chung

AbstractLight therapy has been considered to be effective in mitigating sleepiness and regulating circadian phase shift in shift workers. However, the effective treatment dose of light therapy remains undetermined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized experimental studies to determine the effect of light therapy doses on sleepiness and circadian phase shift in shift workers. An article search was performed in 10 electronic databases from inception to June 2020. Two raters independently screened and extracted data and reached consensus. Twenty-one eligible studies were included. Analyses were performed using random-effects models. Light therapy exerted significantly small to medium effects on sleepiness and large treatment effects on circadian phase shift. Moderator analyses performed with subgroup and metaregression analyses revealed that medium-intensity light therapy for a shorter duration more effectively reduced sleepiness at night, whereas higher-intensity light therapy more effectively induced phase shifting, but the required treatment duration remained inconclusive. This study provides evidence regarding the effect of light therapy in reducing sleepiness and shifting circadian phase in shift workers. Exposure to medium-intensity light for a short duration at night reduced sleepiness, whereas exposure to high-intensity light improved sleep by shifting their circadian phase.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusi Wang ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Dan Rudic ◽  
David Fulton

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Terajima ◽  
Hikari Yoshitane ◽  
Tomoko Yoshikawa ◽  
Yasufumi Shigeyoshi ◽  
Yoshitaka Fukada

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 778-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Turkin ◽  
Katrina S. Monroe ◽  
Thomas M. Hamm

Turkin, Vladimir V., Katrina S. Monroe, and Thomas M. Hamm. Organization of recurrent inhibition and facilitation in motor nuclei innervating ankle muscles of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 778–790, 1998. The distribution of recurrent inhibition and facilitation to motor nuclei of muscles that act at the cat ankle joint was compared with the locomotor activity and mechanical action of those muscles described in published studies. Emphasis was placed on motor nuclei whose muscles have a principal action about the abduction—adduction axis and the pretibial flexors: tibialis posterior (TP), peroneus longus (PerL), peroneus brevis (PerB), the anterior part of tibialis anterior (TA) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL). Most intracellular recordings in spinalized, unanesthetized decerebrate cats showed only inhibitory or excitatory responses to antidromic stimulation of peripheral nerves, but mixed effects were also seen. Recurrent effects among motor nuclei of ankle abductors and adductors were not distributed uniformly. TP motoneurons received recurrent inhibition from most other nuclei active in stance and stimulation of the TP nerve inhibited these motor nuclei. Although PerB motoneurons are also active during stance, they received primarily facilitation from most motor nuclei. PerL received mixtures of inhibition and facilitation from all sources. Stimulation of the nerves to PerL, PerB, and peroneus tertius (PerT) produced weak recurrent inhibition and facilitation, even in homonymous motoneurons and motoneurons of Ia synergists. The ankle flexors TA and EDL displayed different patterns of recurrent inhibition and facilitation. TA motoneurons received prominent homonymous inhibition and inhibition from semitendinosus (St). EDL, whose activity profile differs from TA and which also acts at the digits, did not receive strong recurrent inhibition from either TA or St, nor did stimulation of the EDL nerve produce much inhibition. The distribution of recurrent inhibition and facilitation is correlated with the pattern of locomotor activity, but with exceptions that suggest an influence of mechanical action, particularly in the antagonistic interactions between TP and PerB. The extended pattern of recurrent inhibition, the reduction or absence of inhibition produced by motor nuclei with individualized functions or digit function and the prevalence of facilitation suggest that the recurrent Renshaw system is organized into inhibitory and disinhibitory projections that participate in the control of sets of motor nuclei engaged in rhythmic and stereotyped movements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document