Non-invasive ultrasound localization of impalpable Breast lesions

1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 337-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wilson ◽  
C.R.M. Boggis ◽  
R.E. Mansel ◽  
R.N.L. Harland
1992 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
M. Wilson ◽  
C.R.M. Boggis ◽  
R. Harland ◽  
R.E. Mansel
Keyword(s):  

Oncotarget ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (41) ◽  
pp. 43244-43254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niamh Buckley ◽  
David Boyle ◽  
Darragh McArt ◽  
Gareth Irwin ◽  
D. Paul Harkin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1196-1200
Author(s):  
Manish Raj Pathak ◽  
Mahesh Gautam ◽  
Rashmita Bhandari

Introduction: Breast carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality in females around the world. Ultrasound plays a key role in differentiating cystic and solid lesions and is a convenient and non-invasive diagnostic tool to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in palpable breast lesions. Methodology: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with palpable breast lesions who presented in Department of radio diagnosis and imaging of Nobel Medical collegefor a period of one-year from February 2019- January 2020 using ultrasound. A total of 60 patientswereevaluated in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Results: Out of 60 patients evaluated, ultrasound showed 46 (76.7%) cases to be benign and 14 (23.3%) cases to be malignant. FNAC revealed benign disease in 47 (78.3%) patients and malignant disease in 13 (21.7%) patients. The most common benign lesion was fibroadenoma. We found nearly 91.7% of the malignant lesions had spiculated margins and microcalcification. The sensitivity of ultrasound was 95.74% and specificity 92.3% with diagnostic accuracy 95%. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a convenient and non-invasive diagnostic tool with good sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy in palpable breast lesions.


1999 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
B. Koentges ◽  
P. Van Eijkelenburg ◽  
J. Lamote ◽  
K. Ongena ◽  
R. Sacré

Radiology ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
F C Laing ◽  
R B Jeffrey ◽  
H Minagi

1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 678-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J T Tate ◽  
G T Royle ◽  
P McDonald ◽  
P B Guyer ◽  
I Taylor

Seventy-four patients who have had biopsy of a non-palpable breast lesion are reviewed. A double-dye localization technique was used in 88% while in 12% localization of the lesion was best achieved by ultrasound mammography. Biopsy was successful in 70 patients (95%) at the first attempt. The overall incidence of malignancy was 20%, being greater in asymptomatic patients (32%) than in patients with mastalagia (16%). Re-excision of the biopsy site in these patients showed residual cancer in 33%. It is suggested that both careful examination of the operative specimen and postoperative mammography may be necessary to ensure that the original lesion has been removed. Re-excision of the biopsy site appears to be necessary when the histology is malignant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document