Incidence of Invasive Versus Non-invasive Carcinoma in Comparing Palpable and Non-palpable Solid Breast Lesions

1999 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
B. Koentges ◽  
P. Van Eijkelenburg ◽  
J. Lamote ◽  
K. Ongena ◽  
R. Sacré
1986 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1255-1258
Author(s):  
Osamu WATANABE ◽  
Shunsuke HAGA ◽  
Tadao SHIMIZU ◽  
Tomio IIDA ◽  
Yoko HAGA ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henghui Cheng ◽  
Shouhua Yang ◽  
Zhiling Qu ◽  
Sheng Zhou ◽  
Qiurong Ruan

Aims. DOG1 has proven to be a useful marker of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Recently, DOG1 expression has also been reported in some non-GIST malignant tumors, but the details related to DOG1 expression in breast tissue remain unclear. The aim of this study was to detect the expression of DOG1 in the human breast and to evaluate the feasibility of using DOG1 to discriminate between invasive breast carcinoma and noninvasive breast lesions.Methods and Results. A total of 210 cases, including both invasive and noninvasive breast lesions, were collected to assess DOG1 expression immunohistochemically. DOG1 expression was consistently positive in breast myoepithelial cells (MECs), which was similar to the results obtained for three other MEC markers: calponin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), and P63 (P>0.05in all). Importantly, DOG1 was useful in discriminating invasive breast carcinoma from noninvasive breast lesions (P<0.05).Conclusions. DOG1 is a useful marker of breast MECs, and adding DOG1 to the MEC identification panel will provide more sophisticated information when diagnosing uncertain cases in the breast.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Inamura ◽  
Yuki Togashi ◽  
Kimie Nomura ◽  
Hironori Ninomiya ◽  
Miyako Hiramatsu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Morel ◽  
M. J. Michell

AbstractBenign radial scars, lesions characterised histologically by a fibroelastic core surrounded by stellate duct proliferation, cannot be differentiated from lesions with associated invasive or non-invasive carcinoma on imaging, and histological sampling is therefore mandatory. There is also extensive evidence of the frequency with which radial scars are associated with malignancy and with other lesions that have an associated risk of malignancy. The traditionally accepted management has been the surgical excision of all suspected radial scars because insufficient tissue was removed by standard biopsy techniques to exclude associated lesions. In more recent series, it has been shown that with extensive tissue sampling of such lesions with core biopsy and modern vacuum-assisted sampling devices, the presence of associated malignancy can be excluded, thus negating the need for surgical excision.


1992 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
M. Wilson ◽  
C.R.M. Boggis ◽  
R. Harland ◽  
R.E. Mansel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document