Non invasive breast lesions – the clinical standpoint

Author(s):  
A Galid ◽  
M Stierer
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
M. Wilson ◽  
C.R.M. Boggis ◽  
R. Harland ◽  
R.E. Mansel
Keyword(s):  

Oncotarget ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (41) ◽  
pp. 43244-43254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niamh Buckley ◽  
David Boyle ◽  
Darragh McArt ◽  
Gareth Irwin ◽  
D. Paul Harkin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1196-1200
Author(s):  
Manish Raj Pathak ◽  
Mahesh Gautam ◽  
Rashmita Bhandari

Introduction: Breast carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality in females around the world. Ultrasound plays a key role in differentiating cystic and solid lesions and is a convenient and non-invasive diagnostic tool to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in palpable breast lesions. Methodology: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in patients with palpable breast lesions who presented in Department of radio diagnosis and imaging of Nobel Medical collegefor a period of one-year from February 2019- January 2020 using ultrasound. A total of 60 patientswereevaluated in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Results: Out of 60 patients evaluated, ultrasound showed 46 (76.7%) cases to be benign and 14 (23.3%) cases to be malignant. FNAC revealed benign disease in 47 (78.3%) patients and malignant disease in 13 (21.7%) patients. The most common benign lesion was fibroadenoma. We found nearly 91.7% of the malignant lesions had spiculated margins and microcalcification. The sensitivity of ultrasound was 95.74% and specificity 92.3% with diagnostic accuracy 95%. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a convenient and non-invasive diagnostic tool with good sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy in palpable breast lesions.


1999 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
B. Koentges ◽  
P. Van Eijkelenburg ◽  
J. Lamote ◽  
K. Ongena ◽  
R. Sacré

1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 337-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wilson ◽  
C.R.M. Boggis ◽  
R.E. Mansel ◽  
R.N.L. Harland

2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Ouwerkerk ◽  
Michael A. Jacobs ◽  
Katarzyna J. Macura ◽  
Antonio C. Wolff ◽  
Vered Stearns ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 523
Author(s):  
K. Manickkam Kannappan ◽  
Bhawna Dev ◽  
Ramya Ramakrishnan

Background: To presenting with breast lumps are very common in surgical practice and the routine use of ultrasound in the diagnosis is well validated. But there are gray zones in equivocal cases which increase the number of negative biopsies. To increase the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound by adding another non-invasive modality, namely strain elastography, can reduce this rate. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of strain elastography in the diagnosis of breast masses.Methods: As part of the triple assessment patients presenting with breast lumps underwent ultrasonography and strain elastography, where strain ratios were calculated. Based on which they either underwent percutaneous biopsy or surgical excision. A total of 30 patients with breast lesions underwent sonomammogram in which the breast lesions were both graded with BIRADS and also the elastography and strain ratio was calculated.Results: Strain ratio has higher sensitivity and specificity which makes it a valid diagnostic tool in the evaluation of breast masses.Conclusions: It can also help in reducing the number of benign lesion biopsies and also reduce the number of negative biopsies. Being a non-invasive modality, it is much more patient compatible and economically cheaper when compared with MRI and modalities.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4028
Author(s):  
Marta Giussani ◽  
Chiara Maura Ciniselli ◽  
Loris De Cecco ◽  
Mara Lecchi ◽  
Matteo Dugo ◽  
...  

In population-based screens, tissue biopsy remains the standard practice for women with imaging that suggests breast cancer. We examined circulating microRNAs as minimally invasive diagnostic biomarkers to discriminate malignant from benign breast lesions. miRNAs were analyzed by OpenArray in a retrospective cohort of plasma samples including 100 patients with malignant (T), 89 benign disease (B), and 99 healthy donors (HD) divided into training and testing sets and a prospective cohort (BABE) of 289 women with suspicious imaging findings who underwent tissue biopsy. miRNAs associated with disease status were identified by univariate analysis and then combined into signatures by multivariate logistic regression models. By combining 16 miRNAs differentially expressed in the T vs. HD comparison, 26 signatures were also able to significantly discriminate T from B disease. Seven of them, involving 5 specific miRNAs (miR-625, miR-423-5p, miR-370-3p, miR-181c, and miR-301b), were statistically validated in the testing set. Among the 7 signatures, the discriminatory performances of 5 were confirmed in the prospective BABE Cohort. This study identified 5 circulating miRNAs that, properly combined, distinguish malignant from benign breast disease in women with a high likelihood of malignancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document