Sa1363 International Survey of Methods for Anorectal Manometry: An Exploration of Variability in Current Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma V. Carrington ◽  
Henriette Heinrich ◽  
Mark R. Fox ◽  
Satish S. Rao ◽  
Charles H. Knowles ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Clerc ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
K.R. Ashwin ◽  
S.P. Somashekhar ◽  
Beate Rau ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To assess the risk perception and the uptake of measures preventing environment-related risks in the operating room (OR) during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Methods A multicentric, international survey among OR teams in high-volume HIPEC and PIPAC centers: Surgeons (Surg), Scrub nurses (ScrubN), Anesthesiologists (Anest), Anesthesiology nurses (AnesthN), and OR Cleaning staff (CleanS). Scores extended from 0–10 (maximum). Results Ten centers in six countries participated in the study (response rate 100%). Two hundred and eleven responses from 68 Surg (32%), 49 ScrubN (23%), 45 Anest (21%), 31 AnesthN (15%), and 18 CleanS (9%) were gathered. Individual uptake of protection measures was 51.4%, similar among professions and between HIPEC and PIPAC. Perceived levels of protection were 7.57 vs. 7.17 for PIPAC and HIPEC, respectively (p<0.05), with Anesth scoring the lowest (6.81). Perceived contamination risk was 4.19 for HIPEC vs. 3.5 for PIPAC (p<0.01). Information level was lower for CleanS and Anesth for HIPEC and PIPAC procedures compared to all other responders (6.48 vs. 4.86, and 6.48 vs. 5.67, p<0.01). Willingness to obtain more information was 86%, the highest among CleanS (94%). Conclusions Experience with the current practice of safety protocols was similar during HIPEC and PIPAC. The individual uptake of protection measures was rather low. The safety perception was better for PIPAC, but the perceived level of protection remained relatively low. The willingness to obtain more information was high. Intensified, standardized training of all OR team members involved in HIPEC and PIPAC is meaningful.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. e13016 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Carrington ◽  
H. Heinrich ◽  
C. H. Knowles ◽  
S. S. Rao ◽  
M. Fox ◽  
...  

Pathology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel J. Favaloro ◽  
Roslyn Bonar ◽  
John Sioufi ◽  
Michael Wheeler ◽  
Joyce Low ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. S45-S46 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. King ◽  
M. Barkati ◽  
A. Fyles ◽  
L. Mell ◽  
A. Mundt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
V. V. Lomivorotov ◽  
S. M. Ismoilov ◽  
V. А. Boboshko ◽  
G. Landoni

The objective: to evaluate the international practice of using calcium salts when weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiac surgery in adult patients.Design: a multiple-choice survey about the current practice of calcium salts use when weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass based on the SurveyMonkey platform.Participants: cardiac surgical hospitals around the world.Estimation and main results. Totally 112 emails were sent to Russian and foreign centers inviting them to participate in the survey. 100 centers from 32 countries replied to this request. Generally, the majority of centers (88%) administer calcium salts during surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, and in 71 (71%) centers out of 100, calcium salts are used to improve hemodynamics. Among 88 centers that use calcium salts during surgery, 66% (58/88) of respondents use calcium chloride, 22% (19/88) use calcium gluconate, and 12% (11/88) use both drugs. Most centers (55 (77%) out of 71) use doses of 5 to 15 mg/kg as a bolus or infusion for 1 min.Conclusion: Our survey shows that the majority of cardiac surgery centers use calcium in adult cardiac surgery patients especially during weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. There is variability in the type of drug, dose, and route of administration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document