Mo1887 Early Initiation of Anti-TNF Therapy Does Not Reduce Colectomy or Hospitalization Rates in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S807
Author(s):  
Christopher Ma ◽  
Candace L. Beilman ◽  
Vivian Huang ◽  
Karen Wong ◽  
Karen Kroeker ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S259-S259
Author(s):  
G. Dufour ◽  
R. Altwegg ◽  
J.-C. Valats ◽  
M. Bismuth ◽  
N. Funakoshi ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Zhu ◽  
Jin-fang Sun ◽  
Yun-fei Gu ◽  
Hong-jin Chen ◽  
Min-min Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent studies have confirmed that combined surgery and anti-TNF therapy could improve outcomes in patients with perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease (PFCD). However, the optimal timing for infliximab infusion after surgical intervention is uncertain. We aimed to determine the long-term efficacy of early initiation of infliximab following surgery among PFCD patients. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of PFCD patients who received combined infliximab and surgical treatment between 2010 and 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were grouped according to the time interval between surgery and infliximab infusion, with < 6 weeks into early infliximab induction group and > 6 weeks into delayed infliximab induction group. The primary outcome was to compare surgical re-intervention between early and delayed infliximab induction groups. The secondary outcomes were fistula healing and predictors associated with these outcomes of early infliximab induction approach. Results One hundred and seventeen patients were included (73 in early infliximab induction, 44 in delayed infliximab induction). The median interval between surgery and infliximab initiation was 9.0 (IQR 5.5–17.0) days in early infliximab induction group and 188.0 (IQR 102.25–455.75) days in delayed infliximab induction group. After followed-up for a median of 36 months, 61.6% of patients in early infliximab induction group and 65.9% in delayed infliximab induction group attained fistula healing (p = 0.643). The cumulative re-intervention rate was 23%, 32%, 34% in early infliximab induction group and 16%, 25%, 25% in delayed infliximab induction group, at 1, 2, and 3 years respectively (p = 0.235). Presence of abscess at baseline (HR = 5.283; 95% CI, 1.61–17.335; p = 0.006) and infliximab maintenance therapy > 3 infusions (HR = 3.691; 95% CI, 1.233–11.051; p = 0.02) were associated with re-intervention in early infliximab induction group. Presence of abscess at baseline also negatively influenced fistula healing (HR = 3.429, 95% CI, 1.216–9.668; p = 0.02). Conclusion Although no clear benefit was shown compared with delayed infliximab induction group, early initiation of infliximab after surgery could achieve promising results for PFCD patients. Before infliximab infusion, durable drainage is required for patients with concomitant abscess or prolonged infliximab maintenance therapy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Ma ◽  
Candace L. Beilman ◽  
Vivian W. Huang ◽  
Darryl K. Fedorak ◽  
Karen Wong ◽  
...  

Background.Biologic agents targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha are effective in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), but their use is often postponed until after failure of other treatment modalities.Objectives.We aim to determine if earlier treatment with infliximab or adalimumab alters clinical and surgical outcomes in UC patients.Methods.A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating UC outpatients treated with infliximab or adalimumab from 2003 to 2014. Patients were stratified by time to first anti-TNF exposure; early initiation was defined as starting treatment within three years of diagnosis. Primary outcomes were colectomy, UC-related hospitalization, and clinical secondary loss of response. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess time to the primary outcomes.Results.115 patients were included (78 infliximab, 37 adalimumab). Median follow-up was 175.6 weeks (IQR 72.4–228.4 weeks). Fifty-seven (49.6%) patients received early anti-TNF therapy; median time to treatment in this group was 38.1 (23.3–91.0) weeks compared to 414.0 (254.0–561.3) weeks in the late initiator cohort (p<0.0001). Patients treated with early anti-TNF therapy had more severe endoscopic disease at induction (mean Mayo endoscopy subscore 2.46 (SD ± 0.66) versus 1.86 (±0.67),p<0.001) and trended towards increased risk of colectomy (17.5% versus 8.6%,p=0.16) and UC-related hospitalization (43.9% versus 27.6%,p=0.07). In multivariate regression analysis, early anti-TNF induction was not associated with colectomy (HR 2.02 [95% CI: 0.57–7.20]), hospitalization (HR 1.66 [0.84–3.30]), or secondary loss of response (HR 0.86 [0.52–1.42]).Conclusions.Anti-TNF therapy is initiated earlier in patients with severe UC but earlier treatment does not prevent hospitalization, colectomy, or secondary loss of response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document