Su1392 A Personalized Approach to Adjuvant Therapy: Cytoplasmic HuR Status Predicts Disease Free Survival After Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S1211
Author(s):  
Talar Tatarian ◽  
Amanda Grigoli ◽  
Benjamin E. Leiby ◽  
Masaya Jimbo ◽  
Nooreen Dabbish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Personalized Approach ◽  
Disease Free

scholarly journals Prognostic factors for disease-free survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Tian ◽  
Jisong Li ◽  
Hongqiao Gao ◽  
Yan Zhuang ◽  
Yongsu Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

scholarly journals Adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A Chinese single institution experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Zhuzeng Yin ◽  
Rong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

85 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) is standard care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) vs gemcitabine (GEM) have shown better survival and tumor response with in advanced or metastatic PDAC. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of AG compared with GEM for resected PDAC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed resectable PDAC patients (pts) who received AG or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2013 to December 2016 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Bei Jing, China. Pts received nab-paclitaxel (125mg/m2) followed by GEM (1,000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks or GEM (1,000 mg/m2) alone on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles unless disease progression or there was unacceptable level of adverse events. Disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Among 70 pts received AG or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy, 10 pts were excluded due to the serious complication or R2 resection. The analysis was based on 30 pts in each group undergone complete macroscopic (R0 or R1) resection. Median DFS was 15.8 months (95% CI 13.1-18.5) in AG group (6 pts not arrived) compared with 12.2 months in GEM group (95% CI 9.6-14.8, P = 0.039, 3 pts not arrived). Median OS was 28.3 months (95% CI 21.9-34.6) in AG group (11 pts not arrived) as compared with 20.6 months in GEM group (95% CI 11.2-29.9, P= 0.028, 7 pts not arrived). The 2 years survival rate was 63.3% versus 43.3% in AG group versus GEM group. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were leukopenia (32.3% in AG group vs. 20.7% in GEM group, P= 0.387), neutropenia (45.2% vs.31%, P= 0.298), G-CSF use (41.9% vs. 24.1%, P= 0.177), sensory peripheral neuropathy (51.6% vs. 24.1%, P= 0.036) and fatigue (3.2% vs. 3.4%, P= 0.737). Conclusions: Our results provide the evidence that the adjuvant combination of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved DFS and OS of resected PDAC.

Adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A Chinese single institution.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15740-e15740
Author(s):  
Zhuzeng Yin ◽  
Rong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

e15740 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) is standard care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) vs gemcitabine (GEM) have shown better survival and tumor response with in advanced or metastatic PDAC. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of AG compared with GEM for resected PDAC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed resectable PDAC patients (pts) who received AG or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2013 to December 2016 at the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Bei Jing, China. Pts received nab-paclitaxel (125mg/m2) followed by GEM (1,000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks or GEM (1,000 mg/m2) alone on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles unless disease progression or there was unacceptable level of adverse events. Disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Among 70 pts received AG or GEM as adjuvant chemotherapy, 10 pts were excluded due to the serious complication or R2 resection. The analysis was based on 30 pts in each group undergone complete macroscopic (R0 or R1) resection. Median DFS was 15.8 months (95% CI 13.1-18.5) in AG group (6 pts not arrived) compared with 12.2 months in GEM group (95% CI 9.6-14.8, P= 0.039, 3 pts not arrived). Median OS was 28.3 months (95% CI 21.9-34.6) in AG group (11 pts not arrived) as compared with 20.6 months in GEM group (95% CI 11.2-29.9, P= 0.028, 7 pts not arrived). The 2 years survival rate was 63.3% versus 43.3% in AG group versus GEM group. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were leukopenia (32.3% in AG group vs. 20.7% in GEM group, P= 0.387), neutropenia (45.2% vs.31%, P= 0.298), G-CSF use (41.9% vs. 24.1%, P= 0.177), sensory peripheral neuropathy (51.6% vs. 24.1%, P= 0.036) and fatigue (3.2% vs. 3.4%, P= 0.737). Conclusions: Our results provide the first evidence that the adjuvant combination of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved DFS and OS of resected PDAC. Future RCTs with multi-center participation, particularly focused on adjuvant AG, can further provide information to confirm and strengthen these data.

Precursors of pancreatic cancer in background of chronic opisthorchiasis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-121
Author(s):  
V. U. Rayn ◽  
◽  
M. A. Persidskiy ◽  
E. V. Malakhova ◽  
I. V. Anuchina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Small Samples ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Preneoplastic Lesions ◽  
Opisthorchis Felineus ◽  
Disease Free

Aim. To establish the association between pancreatic cancer precursor lesions and chronic opisthorchiasis. Materials and methods. A single center case-control study was conducted at a low-volume pancreatic surgery center in Khanty-Mansiysk. We retrospectively collected morphological data from 47 pancreatoduodenectomies performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The study group included 23 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with concomitant chronic Opisthorchis felineus invasion which were compared to 24 controls consisting of “pure” cancer. Qualitative analysis was performed using χ2 Pearson criterion. Exact Fisher test was used for small samples. Time to progression and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Data were collected and analyzed in Statistica 7.0. Results. PanINs were seen in 41,7% pancreata resected for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head and in 95,7% cases of pancreatic cancer in background of chronic opisthorchiasis (р = 0,000; 95% CI 3,5-268). PanIN high grade were observed only in opisthorchiasis group. In mixed pathology invasive cancer component tended to be more dedifferentiated and advanced when compared to pure cancer group (p = 0,029). Median disease free survival was 9 mo. in both groups and overall survival was 13 mo. in non-opisthorchiasis group and 15,3 mo. in opisthorchiasis group (р = 0,437). Conclusion. Chronic opisthorchiasis is associated with pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in background of opisthorchiasis with preneoplastic lesions tend to be more advanced in stage and poorly differentiated. Disease free and overall survival have no statistically significant differences in patients with and without Opisthorchis felineus invasion.

scholarly journals Adding pertuzumab to adjuvant therapy for high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer in APHINITY: a GRADE analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Zambelli ◽  
Giovanni Pappagallo ◽  
Paolo Marchetti
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse ◽  
Disease Free

Aim: Adding pertuzumab to standard trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the APHINITY trial. However, the magnitude of benefit was marginal in the overall population. Methods: We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) analysis on data from APHINITY to build summary-of-findings tables to evaluate the efficacy, safety and quality of evidence of predefined clinical outcomes for the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer. Results: Pertuzumab significantly improved 3-year, event-free, absolute benefit in disease-free survival, IDFS and distant relapse-free interval (DFRI) in patients with node-positive or hormone receptor-negative disease. The analysis provides strength of evidence supporting the addition of pertuzumab in this patient population.

Multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer – the Vul.Can Team experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 932-938
Author(s):  
Luca Tagliaferri ◽  
Giorgia Garganese ◽  
Andrea D'Aviero ◽  
Valentina Lancellotta ◽  
Simona Maria Fragomeni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Vulvar Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Personalized Approach ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionMultidisciplinary treatment strategy involving adjuvant radiotherapy for advanced vulvar cancer could be useful in offering the best personalized clinical approach. In 2013, the VULvar CANcer Multi-Disciplinary Team (Vul.Can MDT) was set up in our institution, in order to share knowledge and expertise, high-quality diagnosis, and evidence-based decision making in the context of personalized medicine. The aim of this observational study was to report on our series of vulvar cancer patients managed postoperatively with radiotherapy within the framework of a formal multidisciplinary tumor board.MethodsCoupling surgical and oncological international guidelines with “case-by-case” discussions, a multi-specialist consensus was progressively reached and internal recommendations were developed and introduced in the daily routine. Data from vulvar cancer patients who underwent primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy throughout a 5-year period were retrospectively collected. Actuarial local control was the primary endpoint, while secondary end-points were acute and late toxicities, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event v 4.0 scale.ResultsThe analysis included 35 patients with squamous vulvar cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy±chemotherapy, from April 2013 to September 2017. Median age was 70 years (range 18–87), all patients underwent surgery followed by concomitant chemoradiation (45.7%) or radiotherapy alone (54.3%). The median prophylactic dose on lymphatic drainage was 45 Gy, while positive nodes and perineal area received 51.2 Gy and 52.6 Gy, respectively. Chemotherapy involved the cisplatin-based regimen (45.7%)±5-fluorouracil (37.1%). Median follow-up was 32 months (range 6–72): the 24-months local control, disease-free survival, and actuarial overall survival rates were 88.6%, 82.0%, and 91.0%, respectively. Low rates of severe acute (12%) and late (3%) toxicities occurred.DiscussionThe outcomes of this series support the benefit of a multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer.

Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review From the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care’s Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3395-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Figueredo ◽  
Manya L. Charette ◽  
Jean Maroun ◽  
Melissa C. Brouwers ◽  
Lisa Zuraw
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? Methods A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation. Results Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P = .07). Conclusion There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document