scholarly journals Su1870 – Identifying the Optimal Treatment Sequence with Ustekinumab in Standard Treatment Algorithms for Crohn’s Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-643-S-644
Author(s):  
Frank I. Scott ◽  
Amneet K. Hans ◽  
Mark E. Gerich ◽  
Blair Fennimore ◽  
Ravy K. Vajravelu ◽  
...  
Digestion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 43-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Christian Sulz ◽  
Emanuel Burri ◽  
Pierre Michetti ◽  
Gerhard Rogler ◽  
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Varu ◽  
Florence R. Wilson ◽  
Peter Dyrda ◽  
Maureen Hazel ◽  
Brian Hutton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482093173
Author(s):  
Abel Botelho Quaresma ◽  
Takayuki Yamamoto ◽  
Paulo Gustavo Kotze

Despite significant advances in medical therapy in the management of Crohn’s disease (CD), surgery is still required in a significant proportion of patients and constitutes an important tool in treatment algorithms. Recently, more options of biological agents have been made available, and most patients with CD undergoing surgical procedures have been previously exposed to this class of drugs. There is controversy in the literature as to whether anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, anti-integrins, or anti-interleukins (ILs) have a direct relationship with increased postoperative complications. In this narrative review, the authors summarize the most important data regarding the effect of biologics on postoperative outcomes in CD. Most studies (with different designs) are based on the experience with anti-TNF agents, mostly with infliximab. Some studies outlined the relationship between vedolizumab and postoperative complications, and there is a lack of data with ustekinumab in this scenario. Most studies are retrospective, but few prospective data are available. A cause–effect (proof of concept) direct relationship between biologics and an increase in postoperative morbidity has not been demonstrated to date. Several confounding factors such as previous use of steroids, malnutrition, and unfavorable abdominal conditions have a definitely effect on postoperative complications in CD. Biologics seem safe to be used in the perioperative period, but available data are still controversial. Multidisciplinary individualized decisions should be made on a case-to-case basis, adapting the surgical strategy according to risk factors involved.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S328-S330
Author(s):  
J Schulberg ◽  
E Wright ◽  
B Holt ◽  
T Sutherland ◽  
A Ross ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Strictures are the commonest complication in Crohn’s disease. Surgery and endoscopic dilation are the main treatments; drug therapy has been considered contra-indicated. Given that most strictures have an inflammatory component we aimed to assess the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy, and to identify the optimal treatment. Methods In this randomised trial patients with symptomatic Crohn’s disease strictures and inflammation were assessed by imaging (MRI, colonoscopy, intestinal ultrasound) and for inflammation (faecal calprotectin and CRP). Symptoms were assessed using an Obstructive Symptom Score (OSS). Patients with short endoscopically-accessible strictures had a baseline endoscopic balloon dilation if indicated. Patients were then randomised 2:1 to high dose adalimumab induction (160mg weekly for 4 weeks) with 40mg fortnightly maintenance plus thiopurine, with therapy increased for ongoing inflammation at 4 and 8 months, versus standard dose adalimumab mono-therapy. At 12 months primary endpoint was improved OSS. Secondary outcomes: disease activity, treatment failure, stricture morphology, inflammation, psychological well-being, disability, and quality of life. MRI was assessed blindly. Results 52 patients were randomised to the intensive and 25 to the standard treatment arm. 27 of 52 (52%) intensive treatment patients dose escalated at 4 or 8 months. Improved OSS at 12 months occurred in 41 (79%) intensive treatment and 16 (64%) standard treatment arms (P=0.17). Treatment failure was less common in the intensive treatment arm (10%) versus the standard treatment arm (28%) (P=0·045). Faecal calprotectin normalised (<100mcg/g) in 32 (62%) v 11 (44%) (P=0.15), and CRP normalised in 32 (62%) v 11 (44%) (P=0.15), in intensive versus standard treatment arms respectively. MRI stricture morphology improvement (MaRIA score decrease ≥25%) was seen in 31 (61%) v 9 (28%) (P=0.009) and in 40 (78%) v 14 (56%) using the simplified MaRIA score (≥1 point improvement) (P=0.047). Improvement in bowel wall thickness by >25% on ultrasound was seen in 22/43 (51%) and 7/21 (33%) respectively (P=0.18). MRI complete stricture resolution was seen in 10/51 (20%) and 4/25 (16%) (P=0.7). At 12 month colonoscopy 22/48 (46%) v 9/25 (36%) strictures were passable (P=0.42). 12 month median drug levels were 13.2µg/ml and 6.6µg/ml respectively (P<0.0001). See summary results figure 1 and case example figure 2. Conclusion Crohn’s disease strictures are responsive to drug therapy. A majority of patients experience symptom improvement and many have improved stricture morphology. Treat-to-target therapy intensification results in less treatment failure, less stricture-associated inflammation, and greater improvement in stricture morphology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-122
Author(s):  
Walter Reinisch ◽  
Krisztina Gecse ◽  
Jonas Halfvarson ◽  
Peter M Irving ◽  
Jørgen Jahnsen ◽  
...  

Abstract The introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors has significantly changed the treatment landscape in Crohn’s disease (CD). The overall therapeutic achievements with TNF inhibitors such as infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol paved the way to push the boundaries of treatment goals beyond symptomatic relief and toward cessation of objective signs of inflammation, including endoscopic remission. Even though these agents are widely used for the treatment of moderate to severe CD, heterogeneity still exists in translating evidence-based guidelines on the use of anti-TNF agents into actual treatment algorithms in CD. This might be due to several reasons including disparities in health expenditure policies; lack of harmonization between countries; and variations in assessment of disease severity, use of disease monitoring tools, or application of treatment targets by physicians. With the advent of biosimilars, patent-free versions of reference biologics are now available to minimize health inequalities in drug availability. In this context, this article aims to provide practical clinical guidance for the use of infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars in patients with moderate to severe CD by outlining different clinical scenarios that patients may encounter during their treatment journey.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document