Phase II study of photodynamic therapy and metal stent as palliative treatment for nonresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma

2003 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 860-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Ludwig Dumoulin ◽  
Thomas Gerhardt ◽  
Sybille Fuchs ◽  
Christian Scheurlen ◽  
Michael Neubrand ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Wiedmann ◽  
Frieder Berr ◽  
Ingolf Schiefke ◽  
Helmut Witzigmann ◽  
Kay Kohlhaw ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e030408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen P Rovers ◽  
Robin J Lurvink ◽  
Emma CE Wassenaar ◽  
Thomas JM Kootstra ◽  
Harm J Scholten ◽  
...  

IntroductionRepetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) is offered as a palliative treatment option for patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in several centres worldwide. However, little is known about its feasibility, safety, tolerability, efficacy, costs and pharmacokinetics in this setting. This study aims to explore these parameters in patients with isolated unresectable colorectal PM who receive repetitive ePIPAC-OX as a palliative monotherapy.Methods and analysisThis multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study is performed in two Dutch tertiary referral hospitals for the surgical treatment of colorectal PM. Eligible patients are adults who have histologically or cytologically proven isolated unresectable PM of a colorectal or appendiceal carcinoma, a good performance status, adequate organ functions and no symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction. Instead of standard palliative treatment, enrolled patients receive laparoscopy-controlled ePIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2body surface area (BSA)) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2BSA) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2BSA) every 6 weeks. Four weeks after each procedure, patients undergo clinical, radiological and biochemical evaluation. ePIPAC-OX is repeated until disease progression, after which standard palliative treatment is (re)considered. The primary outcome is the number of patients with major toxicity (grade ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) up to 4 weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX. Secondary outcomes are the environmental safety of ePIPAC-OX, procedure-related characteristics, minor toxicity, postoperative complications, hospital stay, readmissions, quality of life, costs, pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the radiological, histopathological, cytological, biochemical and macroscopic tumour response.Ethics and disseminationThis study is approved by an ethics committee, the Dutch competent authority and the institutional review boards of both study centres. Results are intended for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and for presentation to patients, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders.Trial registration numberNCT03246321, Pre-results;ISRCTN89947480, Pre-results; NTR6603, Pre-results; EudraCT: 2017-000927-29, Pre-results.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chimori Konaka ◽  
Harubumi Kato ◽  
Tetsuya Okunaka ◽  
Yoshihiro Hayata

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biniyam Tefera Deressa ◽  
Wondemagegnehu Tigeneh ◽  
Netsanet Bogale ◽  
Milly Buwenge ◽  
Alessio G. Morganti ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 995-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Takita ◽  
Thomas S. Mang ◽  
Gregory M. Loewen ◽  
Joseph G. Antkowiak ◽  
Derek Raghavan ◽  
...  

Hepatology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1456-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Wagner ◽  
Ulrike W. Denzer ◽  
Daniel Neureiter ◽  
Tobias Kiesslich ◽  
Andreas Puespoeck ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document