Clinical Impact of Conventional Endoscopy in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus and High-Grade Dysplasia or Intramucosal Carcinoma Referred for Endoscopic Ablation Therapy

2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. P108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irving Waxman ◽  
Augusto Villaverde ◽  
Lynne Stearns ◽  
Kenneth Chi ◽  
Timothy Kinney ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1193-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vic Velanovich

Barrett's esophagus is a pathologic change of the normal squamous epithelium of the esophagus to specialized columnar metaplasia. Barrett's esophagus is a result of prolonged exposure of the esophagus to gastroduodenal refluxate. Although Barrett's itself is not symptomatic, and, in fact, patients with Barrett's esophagus may be completely asymptomatic, it does identify patients at higher risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Traditionally, antireflux surgery was reserved for patients with symptoms, because it was believed that antireflux surgery did not eliminate Barrett's esophagus and reduce cancer risk. Rationale for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus beyond treating symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease stems from the hope to decrease, if not eliminate, the risk of adenocarcinoma. Treatment options ranged from medical acid suppression without surveillance to resection. Ablation, particularly endoscopic radio-frequency ablation, has become the standard of care for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. It role in nondysplastic or low-grade dysplastic Barrett's is less clear. Combined endoscopic mucosal resection with ablation is effective in nodular high-grade Barrett's esophagus. Resection should be reserved for patients with persistent high-grade dysplasia despite multiple attempts at endoscopic ablation or resection or for patients with evidence of carcinoma.


2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (suppl d) ◽  
pp. 35D-43D ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad Younes ◽  
Mark D Duncan ◽  
John W Harmon

There have been major recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and epidemiology of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The advent of potent acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors and safe, minimally invasive antireflux procedures has made alleviating symptoms and eliminating peptic complications achievable goals for the vast majority of patients. Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus is considered the standard of care and is widely used in clinical practice. Neither medical nor surgical antireflux procedures, however, result in the regression of Barrett’s esophagus in any consistent manner. Thermal and chemical endoscopic ablation techniques show promise in both the management of high grade dysplasia and the reversal of Barrett’s esophagus, but these techniques are still of unproven benefit, and can be costly and risky. Therefore, prospective and controlled studies with long term follow-up are needed before incorporating ablative techniques into routine clinical practice. Management of high grade dysplasia remains controversial. Alternative management strategies include surveillance, resection or ablation, tailored to the individual patient and the available expertise. Targets for future research include defining appropriate surveillance intervals; finding biological markers that identify patients at higher risk of progressing to cancer; defining the cancer risk and the appropriate management of patients with short segment Barrett’s esophagus; understanding the natural history of dysplasia and comparing alternatives for the management of high grade dysplasia; and studying whether surgical management can delay or prevent the progression to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.


2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E. A. Attwood ◽  
Christopher J. Lewis ◽  
Scott Caplin ◽  
Karla Hemming ◽  
Gordon Armstrong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document