RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING TESTS

1997 ◽  
Vol 158 (5) ◽  
pp. 1861-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah S. Smith ◽  
Arnold D. Bullock ◽  
William J. Catalona
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Carrasco-Garrido ◽  
V. Hernandez-Barrera ◽  
A. Lopez de Andres ◽  
I. Jimenez-Trujillo ◽  
C. Gallardo Pino ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4, jul-ago) ◽  
pp. 542
Author(s):  
Martin Lajous ◽  
Matthew R Cooperberg ◽  
Jennifer Rider ◽  
Hugo Arturo Manzanilla-García ◽  
Fernando Bernardo Gabilondo-Navarro ◽  
...  

 Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based early detection for prostate cancer is the subject of intense debate. Imple­mentation of organized prostate cancer screening has been challenging, in part because the PSA test is so amenable to opportunistic screening. To the extent that access to cancer screening tests increases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is an urgent need to thoughtfully evaluate existing and future cancer screening strategies to ensure benefit and control costs. We used Mexico’s prostate cancer screening efforts to illustrate the challenges LMICs face. We provide five considerations for policymakers for a smarter approach and implementation of PSA-based screening. 


AAOHN Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 379-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Snyder ◽  
Peggy N. Schrammel ◽  
Claudia B. Griffiths ◽  
Robert I. Griffiths

Recognition of the mortality and morbidity associated with prostate cancer has resulted in employer based screening programs. This retrospective cohort study identified the employer costs of prostate cancer screening and referrals due to abnormal test results. The subjects were 385 men enrolled in a workplace screening program at a single employer between 1993 and 1995. Screening consisted of digital rectal examination (DRE) annually for enrolled employees aged 40 years and older, plus annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for those 50 and older, and those 40 and older and considered at high risk. Data related to the health care and lost productivity costs of screening and referrals for abnormal test results were collected and analyzed. The total cost of screening was $44,355, or approximately $56 per screening encounter (788 DREs; 437 PSAs). Abnormal screening tests resulted in 52 referrals. Upon further evaluation, 42% were found to have an enlargement, 29% a node, and 12% benign prostatic hyperplasia. Only one malignancy was found. The total cost of additional referrals was $31,815, or 42% of the cost of screening plus referrals. As the cost per screening encounter was low, prostate cancer screening in the workplace is an efficient alternative.


1996 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 1366-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah S. Smith ◽  
Arnold D. Bullock ◽  
William J. Catalona ◽  
Jonathan D. Herschman

Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (21) ◽  
pp. 5048-5059 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Carpenter ◽  
Paul A. Godley ◽  
Jack A. Clark ◽  
James A. Talcott ◽  
Timothy Finnegan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boon See Teo ◽  
Esther Li ◽  
Clara Tan ◽  
Yasmin Lynda Munro

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONThe effectiveness of cancer screening programmes is highly dependent on screening uptake. Many interventions have been tested to increase screening uptake. AIMThe goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cancer screening pamphlets as a standalone intervention. The outcome of interest was uptake of cancer screening tests. METHODSA systematic review was performed on the effectiveness of pamphlets compared to usual care without pamphlets. We searched five databases for research papers in English from 2000 up to May 2019. Randomised controlled trials were included. This research group independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and then compared the information as a group. RESULTSA total of nine trials involving 4912 participants met our inclusion criteria, of which five were about colorectal cancer screening, three were about prostate cancer screening and one was about lung cancer screening. Five of the nine trials showed that pamphlets alone increased uptake significantly, while the remaining four trials did not show significant effects. DISCUSSIONThere is some evidence that pamphlets increase uptake for cancer screenings, especially for colorectal cancer. Due to the small number of studies in this area, generalisability could be limited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document