Pain Management in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease in a Medical Center Emergency Department

2010 ◽  
Vol 102 (11) ◽  
pp. 1025-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence R. Solomon
Author(s):  
Wilson Andres Vasconez ◽  
Claudia Aguilar-Velez ◽  
Cristina Matheus ◽  
Hector Chavez ◽  
Roxana Middleton-Garcia ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 104 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerlym Porter ◽  
Joe Feinglass ◽  
Nicole Artz ◽  
John Hafner ◽  
Paula Tanabe

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Alice J. Cohen

Background: The most common complication of sickle cell disease (SCD) in adults is vaso-occlusive crisis that is characterized by severe pain. These events can often be managed at home with oral analgesics, but if the pain is not controlled or the patient develops other associated problems, they seek care in an emergency department (ED). In the ED, they receive initial treatment with pain medications and are assessed for other complications such as infection and acute chest syndrome. If an individual's pain is not controlled in a short period of time, the majority of these patients are admitted to the hospital for inpatient management or placed in an observation unit (OBs) for 6-47 hours. The COVID-19 pandemic affected the Greater Newark community starting in mid March with the majority of all inpatient admissions (Ads) being COVID related through the end of May. It has been observed both at our medical center and nationally that during this time period and even afterwards, the number of ED visits and Ads had significantly fallen. The reasons for this finding may include fear of contracting COVID infection at the hospital, regular telemedicine (TM) calls to facilitate outpatient management, and an increase in the number of prescriptions of home pain medications. The purpose of this analysis was to examine patterns of ED visits, Ads, outpatient visits, prescription renewals and nurse (RN) and social worker (MSW) calls in order to determine the impact of COVID-19 infection on the local SCD community. Methodology: A retrospective review was undertaken of billing data and the EMR of all patients with SCD treated at Newark Beth Israel Medical Center (a 450 bed community-based academic tertiary care medical center) between January 2020 and June 2020. Data collected included the number of and reason for ED and OBs, Ads, the number of TM and outpatient visits, and MSW and RN telephone contacts. All patients 18 years of age and older were included. Overall, 100 adults with SCD received care between January and June. Results: Peak hospital COVID Ads, ED and OBs for all patients (SCD and non-SCD) occurred during the weeks between March 25 and May 24, 2020 with a daily inpatient census over 200 between April 7 and 24. SCD Ads at peak COVID (April-May) were significantly lower at 26±2/month compared to 64±11/month pre-COVID (January-February) (p= 0.04). ED and OBs were unchanged. During the peak of COVID, 10/93 (11%) SCD Ads (1 death) were COVID related with 80/96 (86%) for uncomplicated pain crises. MSW and RN called all patients proactively to offer support at onset of COVID pandemic. During this same time period, the number of MSW telephone contacts increased from 138±37/month pre-COVID to 372±21/month during COVID (p=0.02). RN contacts with SCD patients were stable and mostly were for pain prescription renewals. TM was initiated in March 2020 and an increase in these visits correlated with a fall in face to face physician visits: 83.5±11/month pre-COVID to 39.5±8/month peak COVID (p= 0.04), and TM 0/month pre-COVID and 31±4/month peak COVID (0.01). Conclusion: The outbreak of COVID-19 in the community reduced the number of Ads for patients with SCD without an increase in ED and OBs visits. MD face-to-face encounters were reduced but outpatient care continued with the initiation of TM, regular RN contact with maintenance of pain medication prescriptions and a greater numbers of MSW calls for psychosocial support. Further investigation and understanding of the use of Ads for SCD care, and the reduction during COVID, may have implications for current SCD management. Disclosures Cohen: GBT: Speakers Bureau.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Inoue ◽  
Isra’a Khan ◽  
Rao Mushtaq ◽  
Srinivasa Reddy Sanikommu ◽  
Carline Mbeumo ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4846-4846
Author(s):  
Sarah Leonard ◽  
Lindsay Cortright ◽  
Dmitry Tumin ◽  
Lora Joyner ◽  
Sruthipriya Sridhar

Introduction: Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience both acute vaso-occlusive pain (VOC) and chronic pain, both primarily treated with opioids. However, opioids only address the sensory dimension of pain and repeated use of opioids can cause short and long-term side effects such as respiratory system depression, increased risk of cardiovascular events, and hyperalgesia. Non-pharmacologic approaches to the management of acute and chronic SCD pain, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, biofeedback, acupuncture, hypnosis, and megavitamins, have shown positive effects for pain management and may reduce opioid use. Among non-pharmacologic pain management methods, aquatic therapy has been underutilized and understudied in patients with SCD, despite showing benefits for pain management and quality of life in adults with musculoskeletal conditions. At Vidant Medical Center, aquatic therapy has been introduced for patients with SCD in 2015 and has been increasingly used since then. To describe the use of aquatic therapy and outcomes in pediatric patients with SCD, we retrospectively evaluated the use of this therapy at Vidant Medical Center among children hospitalized for acute VOC pain. Methods: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at East Carolina University. Children with SCD between 7-18 years of age at the time of admission for acute VOC pain between the years 2015-2018 were included in the analysis. During the review period, orders for aquatic therapy were placed at the provider's discretion. Our primary outcome was utilization of aquatic therapy during a given hospitalization, determined by retrospective query of the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcomes include length of stay and time to readmission for VOC. Covariates were assessed at the time of the index admission included age, sex, and insurance coverage. Mixed-effects logistic or Poisson regression models were fitted to account for multiple hospitalizations per patient. Results: The analysis included 316 hospitalizations of 87 patients (48% female; median age at the earliest hospitalization, 11 years). The median duration of hospital admissions was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 3, 7). Aquatic therapy was used in 38% of admissions, with a trend of increasing use during the study period (Figure 1). On multivariable logistic regression analysis of aquatic use during a given admission, characteristics associated with greater likelihood of aquatic therapy use included older age and more recent year of admission. Aquatic therapy was associated with 69% longer hospital stays, although this may be related to availability of aquatic therapy services. Among 52 patients with multiple admissions, use of aquatic therapy during a given admission was associated with 26% more days between hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.31; p=<0.001). Conclusion: Research into the use of non-pharmacologic pain management strategies for sickle cell disease has recently increased in order to better address the multidimensional aspects of pain. Of these management strategies, aquatic therapy has been very underutilized and under researched. Analysis of the utilization of aquatic therapy in our institution showed improved use over the last 3 years as well as increased duration between hospitalizations after the use of aquatic therapy. These positive results point towards the need for more research into other outcome measures derived from the use of aquatic therapy in pain management of pediatric SCD patients. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4700-4700
Author(s):  
Brian Pennarola ◽  
Patrick Demartino ◽  
Dale W. Steele ◽  
Susan J. Duffy

Abstract Introduction: Qualitative research identifies delayed analgesia and under-dosing as common reasons for patient/caregiver dissatisfaction with the treatment of acute vaso-occlusive pain in sickle cell disease (SCD). Experts have identified quality measures for emergency department (ED) management of acute pain in SCD including early administration of IV analgesics (NHLBI 2014). Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients are especially at risk for dissatisfaction, and qualitative studies identify the transition from pediatric (PED) to adult emergency department (AED) care as the most difficult site of transition. Information from empirical studies of SCD pain management in PEDs and AEDs is needed to facilitate overall improvements in care and facilitate transitions of care for AYA patients. The goal of this study was to examine differences in management of SCD pain between a PED and an AED. The primary outcome was time from triage to first opioid. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCD and acute pain, age 3 - 27 years, seeking care from June 2015 to December 2016 in the AED and/or PED within our academic, tertiary care institution. Four visits per individual per ED were abstracted. Visits were excluded if no opioid was administered, for confounding sources of pain (e.g. post-operative), transfer from another ED or critical illness. Important encounter characteristics and outcomes were summarized by mean with standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR) for skewed data. We compared the difference between EDs for the primary outcome using a Cox proportional hazards model with a patient-level random effect. Results: Our initial electronic health record query yielded 353 visits by 66 patients to the PED and AED. Two patients accounted for 46% of visits (77 and 84 visits). After excluding visits by patients transferred from an outside facility (n=1), with confounding illness (n=6) or no opioid administered (n=3), we extracted data on up to 4 visits per ED per patient and analyzed 127 visits by 55 patients. Demographics, initial pain score, treatments and treatment timeline are summarized by ED (Table 1). The Kaplan-Meier plot (Figure 1) shows the proportion of patients receiving the first intravenous opioid dose, by ED, as a function of time from triage. At any given time, the probability of receiving the first opioid dose in the PED was approximately 3 times greater than in the AED (hazard ratio of 2.95 (95% CI 1.93, 4.50), p < 0.001). Patients in the AED were more likely to receive hydromorphone than morphine and adjunctive NSAIDs were rarely given. More than an hour elapsed between the 1st and 2nd opioid doses in both EDs. Intravenous hydration with normal saline boluses was common in both EDs. An individualized prescribing and monitoring protocol, written by the patient's SCD provider (pain plan) was rarely available to ED providers. Conclusions: Optimal management of acute pain in patients with SCD is difficult, a challenge exacerbated by practice and cultural differences in pediatric versus adult settings. Considering the primary outcome, the PED administered IV analgesia more quickly than the AED, although neither site provided treatment consistently within 30 minutes from triage as per the NHLBI guidelines. Much of the delay in time to first opioid in the AED (Figure 1) is explained by longer rooming times. Our data are limited in that we cannot differentiate whether the delay is due to longer overall wait times or lower prioritization of patients. Nonetheless, this difference remains a known driver of patient dissatisfaction. Our results highlight multiple opportunities in both EDs to improve care including earlier administration and individualized dosing of opioids, reducing the time interval between subsequent doses, routine administration of NSAIDs, avoidance of fluid boluses in euvolemic patients and development of patient specific pain plans. Emergency providers could benefit from education and localized practice guidelines with written protocols and electronic alerts, targeted at quality improvement. The AED could also potentially benefit from focused effort to reduce time from triage to room. Subspecialty providers could assist the ED by routinely providing pain plans; this could help achieve more uniform care across individual encounters in both EDs, particularly in the few patients accounting for a large proportion of all encounters. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document