Trace element trophic transfer in aquatic organisms: A critique of the kinetic model approach

1998 ◽  
Vol 219 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 117-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Reinfelder ◽  
N.S. Fisher ◽  
S.N. Luoma ◽  
J.W. Nichols ◽  
W.-X. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Model ◽  
Trace Element ◽  
Aquatic Organisms ◽  
Trophic Transfer ◽  
Model Approach

Residue Desulfurization: A Kinetic Model Approach

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-389
Author(s):  
K. Le Lannic ◽  
I. Guibard
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Model ◽  
Model Approach

Quinidine and Haloperidol as Modifiers of CYP3A4 Activity: Multisite Kinetic Model Approach

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1512-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Galetin ◽  
Stephen E. Clarke ◽  
J. Brian Houston
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Model ◽  
Cyp3a4 Activity ◽  
Model Approach

Iron-atom condensation interpreted by a kinetic model and a nucleation model approach

2004 ◽  
Vol 77 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 115-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Giesen ◽  
A. Kowalik ◽  
P. Roth
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Model ◽  
Iron Atom ◽  
Nucleation Model ◽  
Model Approach

Preliminary design of the activated sludge system — standard codes versus kinetic model equations

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Frederick L. Hart
Keyword(s):  
Waste Water ◽  
Kinetic Model ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
System Size ◽  
Aeration Tank ◽  
Domestic Waste ◽  
Design Values ◽  
Model Equations ◽  
Biological Treatment System ◽  
Model Approach

This paper discusses the origin and concepts of kinetic model equations and standard specifications used to size a biological treatment system (size of aeration tank and aeration requirements). They are shown to yield very similar calculations for a domestic type of waste water, but may yield much different values if the waste water behaves differently than domestic waste. The kinetic model approach, therefore, should be considered more flexible and superior in its ability to yield appropriate design values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document