Clinical course of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in patients with or without cancer: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. S81-S88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Bleker ◽  
Nick van Es ◽  
Luuk van Gils ◽  
Joost G. Daams ◽  
Ankie Kleinjan ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jan Heil ◽  
Wolfgang Miesbach ◽  
Thomas Vogl ◽  
Wolf O. Bechstein ◽  
Alexander Reinisch

Author(s):  
Emanuele Valeriani ◽  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
Enrica Porceddu ◽  
Fabiana Agostini ◽  
Roberto Pola ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartiga Thiyagarajah ◽  
Leah Ellingwood ◽  
Kaitlin Endres ◽  
Aaron Hegazi ◽  
James Radford ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 2516-2522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payal Patel ◽  
Cody Braun ◽  
Parth Patel ◽  
Meha Bhatt ◽  
Housne Begum ◽  
...  

Abstract Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for ≤10% of DVT and can be associated with morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are necessary for safe and effective patient management. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of D-dimer and duplex ultrasonography (US) for the evaluation of suspected first-episode UEDVT. We searched the Cochrane Central Register, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. We included prospective cross-sectional and cohort studies that evaluated test accuracy. Two investigators independently screened and collected data. The risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review included 9 studies. The pooled estimates for D-dimer sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.43-0.52), respectively. The pooled estimates for duplex US sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93), respectively. Certainty of evidence was moderate. In this review, we summarized the test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of D-dimer and duplex US for this indication. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests found in the present review should be considered in the context of whether they are used alone or in combination, which is dependent on the prevalence of disease in the population, the clinical setting in which the patient is being evaluated, cost, potential harms, and patient outcomes. This study was registered at PROSPERO as Systematic Review Registration Number CRD42018098488.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 684-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. DI NISIO ◽  
G. L. VAN SLUIS ◽  
P. M. M. BOSSUYT ◽  
H. R. BÜLLER ◽  
E. PORRECA ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 2779-2788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payal Patel ◽  
Parth Patel ◽  
Meha Bhatt ◽  
Cody Braun ◽  
Housne Begum ◽  
...  

Abstract After deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is diagnosed, prompt evaluation and therapeutic intervention are of paramount importance for improvement in patient-important outcomes. We systematically reviewed patient-important outcomes in patients with suspected DVT, including mortality, incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and DVT, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and postthrombotic sequelae. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Medline, Embase for eligible studies, references lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. Two investigators screened and abstracted data. Nine studies with 5126 patients were included for lower extremity DVT. Three studies with 500 patients were included for upper extremity DVT. Among patients with lower extremity DVT, 0.85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 2.10%) and 0% developed recurrent DVT and PE, respectively, at 3 months. Among patients with upper extremity DVT, 0.49% (95% CI, 0% to 1.16%) and 1.98% (95% CI, 0.62% to 3.33%) developed recurrent DVT and PE, respectively, at 3 months. No major bleeding events were reported for those anticoagulated, which is lower than in other systematic reviews. For both upper and lower extremity DVT, low pretest probability patients with a negative D-dimer had a comparable incidence of VTE at 3 months (∼1%) as patients with a negative ultrasound (US). At higher pretest probabilities, negative US testing with or without serial US appears to be the safer option. In this review, we summarized the outcomes of patients evaluated by various diagnostic pathways. In most instances, there was significant limitation due to small population size or lack of direct evidence of effects of using a specific pathway. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42018100502.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 878
Author(s):  
Yesha H. Parekh ◽  
Nicole J. Altomare ◽  
Erin P. McDonnell ◽  
Martin J. Blaser ◽  
Payal D. Parikh

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leading to COVID-19 induces hyperinflammatory and hypercoagulable states, resulting in arterial and venous thromboembolic events. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been well reported in COVID-19 patients. While most DVTs occur in a lower extremity, involvement of the upper extremity is uncommon. In this report, we describe the first reported patient with an upper extremity DVT recurrence secondary to COVID-19 infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document