Geology of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands

Author(s):  
Lindsay B. Collins ◽  
Zhong Rong Zhu ◽  
Karl-Heinz Wyrwoll
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Blakeway ◽  
Michael G Hamblin

The three-dimensional form of a coral reef develops through interactions and feedbacks between its constituent organisms and their environment. Reef morphology therefore contains a potential wealth of ecological information, accessible if the relationships between morphology and ecology can be decoded. Traditionally, reef morphology has been attributed to external controls such as substrate topography or hydrodynamic influences. Little is known about inherent reef morphology in the absence of external control. Here we use reef growth simulations, based on observations in the cellular reefs of Western Australia’s Houtman Abrolhos Islands, to show that reef morphology is fundamentally determined by the mechanical behaviour of the reef-building organisms themselves—specifically their tendency to either remain in place or to collapse. Reef-building organisms that tend to remain in place, such as massive and encrusting corals or coralline algae, produce nodular reefs, whereas those that tend to collapse, such as branching Acropora, produce cellular reefs. The purest reef growth forms arise in sheltered lagoons dominated by a single type of reef builder, as in the branching Acropora-dominated lagoons of the Abrolhos. In these situations reef morphology can be considered a phenotype of the predominant reef building organism. The capacity to infer coral type from reef morphology can potentially be used to identify and map specific coral habitat in remotely sensed images. More generally, identifying ecological mechanisms underlying other examples of self-generated reef morphology can potentially improve our understanding of present-day reef ecology, because any ecological process capable of shaping a reef will almost invariably be an important process in real time on the living reef.


2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. NARDI ◽  
G.P. JONES ◽  
M.J. MORAN ◽  
Y.W. CHENG

A unique assemblage of tropical and temperate marine organisms characterizes the Houtman Abrolhos Islands, four clusters of islands and reefs off the coast of mid-Western Australia. Four reef observation areas or marine protected areas (MPAs) were established in 1994 to examine their value in protecting vulnerable reef fish species, including the sub-tropical wrasse, Choerodon rubescens, and the coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus. In 1993 and 1994 (prior to protection), population densities and body sizes were monitored at two island groups (Easter and Wallabi). At each location, the MPAs and the equivalent ‘control’ areas to remain open to fishing were monitored by underwater visual censuses. These closed and open areas were subsequently monitored four more times between 1995 and 2002 to assess long-term trends in abundance and population structure. Populations of the wrasse, C. rubescens, did not appear to respond to protection, exhibiting irregular fluctuations in both closed and open areas throughout the study. In contrast, although there were no significant increases for P. leopardus for the first three years of closure, after eight years of protection there were significantly larger numbers of P. leopardus in the closed areas. There was a three-fold increase at the Easter Group and a seven-fold increase at the Wallabi Group, relative to open fishing areas, attributed primarily to reduced fishing mortality. Significant closed areas (17% of the P. leopardus habitat) provided substantial stock-wide impacts. The data also indicate that the MPAs can be effective where some forms of fishing (such as lobster fishing) are permitted which are compatible with the objectives of the MPA. While MPAs are clearly an effective tool for increasing the local abundance of some reef fishes, the spatial and temporal scales required for their success may vary among species.


2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1581-1607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Saunders ◽  
Christopher E. Lane ◽  
Craig W. Schneider ◽  
Gerald T. Kraft

The senior author was fortunate in 1996 to dive on the remote Houtman Abrolhos Islands of Western Australia and view in situ the stunning “ Asteromenia peltata ” that is so strikingly illustrated by John Huisman (viewable on AlgaeBase). Five years later, during excursions to Bermuda and Lord Howe Island (tropical eastern Australia), he observed and collected specimens referable to this species in both these localities. Based on their respective appearances in the field, it seemed unlikely that these entities from geographically remote regions represented the same species. Our molecular results not only confirm this suspicion, but further indicate that A. peltata sensu lato constitutes a complex of at least five distinct species. We restrict A. peltata to one of two species found in the western (sub)tropical North Atlantic, the second described herein as A. bermudensis sp. nov. Samples from Western Australia represent an undescribed species, A. exanimans sp. nov., while two entities collected from Lord Howe Island (A. anastomosans (Weber-van Bosse) comb. nov. and A. pseudocoalescens sp. nov.) conform to records variously reported as Asteromenia peltata and Drouetia coalescens . Specimens of D. coalescens from South Africa are also not representative of the genus Drouetia , but form a novel lineage within the Rhodymeniaceae. We included two species of Halichrysis in our molecular analyses and, in combination with observations of salient anatomical features, provide arguments for maintaining Asteromenia, Drouetia, and Halichrysis as distinct genera.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Thomas ◽  
Michael Stat ◽  
Gary A. Kendrick ◽  
Jean-Paul A. Hobbs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document