Mesotendons of Digital Flexor Muscles and Their Vasculature

HAND ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol os-13 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zbrodowski ◽  
S. Gajisin ◽  
J. Grodecki
Keyword(s):  
Blood Supply ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Gelatin Solution ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Arterial Network ◽  
India Ink ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Human Cadavers ◽  
Flexor Digitorum

The detailed anatomy of the tendinous apparatus of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis muscles was studied on 150 fresh and formalin-preserved human cadavers. The dissection revealed the existence of different types of mesotendons. Injection of coloured latex or an India ink and gelatin solution showed their arterial network and the sources of blood supply.

scholarly journals Bilateral Variation of Forearm Flexor Muscles - A Case Report and Clinical Significance

2012 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 040-043
Author(s):  
D. Malar ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Middle Finger ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Flexor Carpi Ulnaris ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Flexor Muscles ◽  
Male Cadaver ◽  
Forearm Flexor Muscles ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
Forearm Flexor

AbstractDuring routine dissection, bilateral multiple variations of forearm flexor muscles were observed in a male cadaver. The variations were a) an additional belly arising from the coronoid process of ulna, distal to the origin of ulnar head of flexor digitorum superficialis, passing deep to flexor digitorum superficialis and joining the tendon of flexor digitorum profundus to the middle finger; b) an additional belly arising from the distal part of flexor carpi ulnaris and passing superficial to ulnar nerve and ulnar vessels in the Guyon's canal and c) the origin of second lumbricals from the profundus tendon in the carpal tunnel. An aberrant muscle may stimulate a ganglion or a soft tissue tumor or if in close proximity to a nerve, it may cause pressure neuritis. Identification of these variations is important in defining the anatomical features for clinical diagnosis and surgical procedures.

The Blood Supply of the Lumbrical Muscles

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. ZBRODOWSKI ◽  
E. MARIÉTHOZ ◽  
M. BEDNARKIEWICZ ◽  
S. GAJISIN
Keyword(s):  
Blood Supply ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Digital Artery ◽  
Palmar Arch ◽  
Human Cadavers ◽  
The Common ◽  
Lumbrical Muscles ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Flexor Digitorum

The blood supply of the lumbrical muscles was studied in 100 upper extremities from fresh human cadavers. Layer by layer dissection revealed the existence of different types of vascularity for the four muscles. The injection of coloured latex or Indian ink solution with gelatin showed the complex arterial network of these muscles together with their various sources of blood supply. Four separate sources of blood supply for each of the muscles were found: the superficial palmar arch (SPA), the common palmar digital artery, the deep palmar arch (DPA) and the dorsal digital artery. It was established that there were no anastomoses between the blood vessels of the tendons of the flexor digitorum profundus muscle and those of the lumbrical muscles. Considerable differences were observed in the details of the blood supply of the individual lumbrical muscles.

OUTCOME OF TRACTION TENOLYSIS IN OPEN TRIGGER FINGER RELEASE — A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

Hand Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muntasir Mannan Choudhury ◽  
Shian Chao Tay
Keyword(s):  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Active Motion ◽  
Total Active Motion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
A1 Pulley

Surgical treatment for trigger finger involves division of the A1 pulley. Some surgeons perform an additional step of traction tenolysis by sequentially bringing the flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus tendons out of the wound gently with a Ragnell retractor. There is currently no study which states whether flexor tendon traction tenolysis should be routinely performed or not. The objective of this study is to compare the outcome in patients who have traction tenolysis performed (A group) versus those who did not have traction tenolysis (B group) performed. It was noted that even though the mean total active motion (TAM) for the B group in our study was lower preoperatively, it was consistently higher than the A group in all the 3 post-operative visits demonstrating a better outcome in the B group. Even though it was not statistically significant, our data also showed that patients with traction tenolysis appeared to have more postoperative pain compared to those without.

Sliding Position of the Flexor Tendons Relative to the Hook of Hamate in CT Scans

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 72-75
Author(s):  
Kenji Goto ◽  
Kiyohito Naito ◽  
Yoichi Sugiyama ◽  
Nana Nagura ◽  
Ayaka Kaneko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Tendon Injury ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Ulnar Side ◽  
Flexor Tendon Injury ◽  
Hook Of Hamate ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
Little Finger

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the height of nonunion formation injuring the ulnar-side finger flexor tendon, the positional relationship between the hook of the hamate and little finger flexor tendon was evaluated on CT scans. Methods: The subjects were 20 healthy patients (40 hands) (14 males and 6 females, mean age: 28 years old). Their hands were imaged in extension and flexion of the fingers on CT. The position of the little finger flexor tendon was determined regarding the height of the hook of the hamate as 100%. Results: The heights of the flexor digitorum profundus tendons were 46 ± 6% in extension and 44 ± 9% in flexion, and those of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendons were 87 ± 8% in extension and 91 ± 9% in flexion. Conclusions: Our study suggested that 40% of the base of the hook of the hamate does not contact with the flexor tendon, suggesting that flexor tendon injury is unlikely to occur in that region.

Flexor digitorum profundus with or without flexor digitorum superficialis tendon repair in acute Zone 2B injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1034-1044
Author(s):  
Ahmed F. Sadek
Keyword(s):  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Power Grip ◽  
Contralateral Hand ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus Tendon

A total of 53 patients with complete cuts of two flexor tendons in Zone 2B treated over a 9-year period was reviewed. Twenty-three patients (28 fingers) had only flexor digitorum profundus repair, while 30 patients (36 fingers) had both flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis repairs, with a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 12–84). The decision to repair the flexor digitorum superficialis was made according to intraoperative judgement of ease of repair and gliding of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Two groups of patients showed no significant differences in total range of active or passive digital motion and power grip percentage to the contralateral hand. However, the values of power grip were statistically superior in the patients with both tendons repaired. The patients after flexor digitorum profundus-only repairs showed significantly greater but still mild flexion contracture (mean 20 °) of the operated digits. The Tang gradings were the same with 89% good and excellent rates in both groups. The conclusion is that although repair of both flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis tendons is slightly more preferable based on increased grip strength, the repair of the flexor digitorum superficialis together with flexor digitorum profundus is not mandatory. Whether or not to repair flexor digitorum superficialis is an intraoperative decision based on the ease of gliding of the repaired tendon(s). Level of evidence: III

scholarly journals Unusual Closed Traumatic Avulsion of Both Flexor Tendons in Zones 1 and 3 of the Little Finger

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Marie-Aimée Päivi Soro ◽  
Thierry Christen ◽  
Sébastien Durand
Keyword(s):  
Rare Condition ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Flexor Tendons ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
Tendon Avulsion ◽  
Little Finger

Closed tendon avulsion of both flexor tendons in the same finger is an extremely rare condition. We encountered the case of a patient who presented a rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus in zone 1 and flexor digitorum superficialis in zone 3 in the little finger. This occurrence has not been reported previously. We hereby present our case, make a review of the literature of avulsion of both flexor tendons of the same finger, and propose a treatment according to the site of the ruptures.

Effect of a Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Hemitenodesis on Reducing Volar Plate Strains for Swan Neck Deformities

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110408
Author(s):  
Mohammad M. Haddara ◽  
Assaf Kadar ◽  
Louis M. Ferreira ◽  
Nina Suh
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Motion Simulator ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intact Condition ◽  
Flexor Digitorum

Background Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) hemitenodesis is a common procedure to treat swan neck deformity (SND). We hypothesize that this surgical technique is a biomechanically effective way to reduce strain in the volar plate at the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ). Methods Fifteen digits from 5 cadaveric specimens were tested using a novel in vitro active finger motion simulator under 4 finger conditions: intact, SND, FDS hemitenodesis, and FDS hemitenodesis with distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint fusion. Tensile loads in FDS and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and joint ranges of motion were measured by electromagnetic tracking. In addition, strain gauges were inserted under the volar plate to measure strain during PIPJ hyperextension. Results were analyzed using 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance tests. Results The SND condition increased volar plate strain by 176% ± 25% ( P < .001) compared with the intact condition. The FDS hemitenodesis repair relieved more than 50% of the SND strain, restoring it to within no statistical difference from intact. The DIP fusion further reduced strain with no further statistical significance. At full flexion, FDS and FDP tendon loads diverged as a function of the test condition ( P < .001). With the FDS hemitenodesis, the FDP load increased by 2.1 ± 1.5 N from the SND condition ( P < .001), whereas the FDS load decreased by 1.3 ± 1.3 N ( P = .012). Conclusion The FDS hemitenodesis repair restored strains to within 3.0 milli-strain of the intact condition with no significant difference. Application of DIP fusion did not further protect the PIPJ from increased hyperextension and further exacerbated the imbalance of flexor tendon loads.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document