Epidemiology of Childhood Tuberculosis in the United States, 1993–2001: The Need for Continued Vigilance

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 ◽  
pp. 249-252
Author(s):  
J.A. Stockman
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Nelson ◽  
E. Schneider ◽  
C. D. Wells ◽  
M. Moore

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 343-353
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Starke

Despite the availability of effective antituberculosis drugs, tuberculosis remains an important cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures in the United States. It is estimated that more than 10 million people in the United States are infected with the tubercle bacillus. More than 26 000 new cases of clinical tuberculosis occur every year, 1600 of which occur in children. Factors that serve to sustain tuberculosis in the United States include infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), influx of foreign-born individuals at increased risk of developing tuberculosis, and poverty and poor access to medical care experienced by large segments of the population. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has a goal of eliminating tuberculosis from the United States by the year 2010. If this goal is to be achieved, programs must focus on children because they are the future reservoir for the disease. Tuberculosis cases in children are important public health markers for a community insofar as they represent ongoing transmission of the disease and at least a partial failure of current tuberculosis control efforts. Epidemiology of Childhood Tuberculosis The incidence of tuberculosis in the United States declined steadily for a 25-y period until 1985, when it leveled off (Fig 1). More than 26 000 cases of tuberculosis were diagnosed in the United States during 1991; almost 1600 cases occurred in children <15 y.


Author(s):  
A. Hakam ◽  
J.T. Gau ◽  
M.L. Grove ◽  
B.A. Evans ◽  
M. Shuman ◽  
...  

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of men in the United States and is the third leading cause of death in men. Despite attempts at early detection, there will be 244,000 new cases and 44,000 deaths from the disease in the United States in 1995. Therapeutic progress against this disease is hindered by an incomplete understanding of prostate epithelial cell biology, the availability of human tissues for in vitro experimentation, slow dissemination of information between prostate cancer research teams and the increasing pressure to “ stretch” research dollars at the same time staff reductions are occurring.To meet these challenges, we have used the correlative microscopy (CM) and client/server (C/S) computing to increase productivity while decreasing costs. Critical elements of our program are as follows:1) Establishing the Western Pennsylvania Genitourinary (GU) Tissue Bank which includes >100 prostates from patients with prostate adenocarcinoma as well as >20 normal prostates from transplant organ donors.


Author(s):  
Vinod K. Berry ◽  
Xiao Zhang

In recent years it became apparent that we needed to improve productivity and efficiency in the Microscopy Laboratories in GE Plastics. It was realized that digital image acquisition, archiving, processing, analysis, and transmission over a network would be the best way to achieve this goal. Also, the capabilities of quantitative image analysis, image transmission etc. available with this approach would help us to increase our efficiency. Although the advantages of digital image acquisition, processing, archiving, etc. have been described and are being practiced in many SEM, laboratories, they have not been generally applied in microscopy laboratories (TEM, Optical, SEM and others) and impact on increased productivity has not been yet exploited as well.In order to attain our objective we have acquired a SEMICAPS imaging workstation for each of the GE Plastic sites in the United States. We have integrated the workstation with the microscopes and their peripherals as shown in Figure 1.


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 53-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Rehfeld

Every ten years, the United States “constructs” itself politically. On a decennial basis, U.S. Congressional districts are quite literally drawn, physically constructing political representation in the House of Representatives on the basis of where one lives. Why does the United States do it this way? What justifies domicile as the sole criteria of constituency construction? These are the questions raised in this article. Contrary to many contemporary understandings of representation at the founding, I argue that there were no principled reasons for using domicile as the method of organizing for political representation. Even in 1787, the Congressional district was expected to be far too large to map onto existing communities of interest. Instead, territory should be understood as forming a habit of mind for the founders, even while it was necessary to achieve other democratic aims of representative government.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document