Inhibition of Intra-Abdominal Adhesion Formation With the Angiogenesis Inhibitor Sunitinib

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 286-287
Author(s):  
K.I. Bland
2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sendia Kim ◽  
Sang Lee ◽  
Arin K. Greene ◽  
Danielle A. Arsenault ◽  
Hau Le ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Agacayak ◽  
Senem Yaman Tunc ◽  
Mehmet Sait Icen ◽  
Ulas Alabalik ◽  
Fatih Mehmet Findik ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Yunhua Wu ◽  
Enmeng Li ◽  
Zijun Wang ◽  
Tianli Shen ◽  
Cong Shen ◽  
...  

Background. Postoperative abdominal adhesion remains one of the frequent complications after abdominal surgery and lacks effective intervention. Peritoneal mesothelial cell injury and healing play crucial roles in the process of adhesion formation, and identifying this mechanism might provide new insight into possible new therapeutic strategies for this disease. Transmembrane and immunoglobulin domain-containing 1 (TMIGD1) has been proven to protect renal epithelial cells from injury induced by oxidative stress and has also been identified as a novel adhesion molecule. Here, we investigated the role of TMIGD1 and its possible mechanism in adhesion formation. Materials and Methods. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), qPCR, and immunofluorescence (IHF) were used to detect the expression of TMIGD1. The grade and tenacity score of adhesion were used to evaluate the adhesion formation conditions. A TMIGD1-overexpressing HMrSV5 cell line was established. MTT assay, Western blotting, Annexin V apoptosis analysis, and CK19 staining were used to measure mesothelial cell viability, apoptosis, and completeness. ROS and MDA detection were used to measure mesothelial cell oxidative stress levels. JC-1 staining, IHF, and transmission electron microscopy were performed to assess mitochondrial function. Scratch-wound and adhesion assays were used to evaluate the adhesion ability of mesothelial cells. Results. First, we showed that TMIGD1 was decreased in mouse abdominal adhesion tissue and peritoneal mesothelial cells. Second, TMIGD1 overexpression inhibited adhesion formation. Third, TMIGD1 overexpression protected mesothelial cells from hydrogen peroxide- (H2O2-) induced oxidative stress injury. Fourth, TMIGD1 overexpression alleviated oxidative stress by protecting the mitochondrial function of mesothelial cells. In addition, TMIGD1 overexpression enhanced mesothelial cell adhesion. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that TMIGD1 protects mesothelial cells from oxidative stress injury by protecting their mitochondrial function, which is decreased in regular abdominal adhesion tissue. In addition, TMIGD1 enhances peritoneal mesothelial cell adhesion to promote healing.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cancan Zhou ◽  
Pengbo Jia ◽  
Zhengdong Jiang ◽  
Ke Chen ◽  
Guanghui Wang ◽  
...  

The intestine function recovery decoction (IFRD) is a traditional Chinese medicine that has been used for the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. In this study, the preventative effects and probable mechanism of the IFRD were investigated in a rat model. We randomly assigned rats to five groups: normal, model, control, low dose IFRD, and high dose IFRD. In the animal model, the caecum wall and parietal peritoneum were abraded to induce intra-abdominal adhesion formation. Seven days after surgery, adhesion scores were assessed using a visual scoring system, and histopathological samples were examined. The levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) were analysed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results showed that a high dose of IFRD reduced the grade of intra-abdominal adhesion in rats. Furthermore, the grades of inflammation, fibrosis, and neovascularization in the high dose IFRD group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The results indicate that the IFRD can prevent intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model. These data suggest that the IFRD may be an effective antiadhesion agent.


Surgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 149 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel I. Chu ◽  
Rizal Lim ◽  
Stanley Heydrick ◽  
Melanie L. Gainsbury ◽  
Rami Abdou ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3008-3013 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Demirturk ◽  
H. Aytan ◽  
A. Caliskan ◽  
P. Aytan ◽  
T. Yener ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. S90
Author(s):  
John P. Kuckelman ◽  
Morgan Barron ◽  
Kevin Kniery ◽  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
Joseph P. Kononchik ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deshka S. Foster ◽  
Clement D. Marshall ◽  
Gunsagar S. Gulati ◽  
Malini S. Chinta ◽  
Alan Nguyen ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fikret Ezberci ◽  
Ertan Bulbuloglu ◽  
Pinar Ciragil ◽  
Mustafa Gul ◽  
Ergul Belge Kurutas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document