abdominal adhesion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

144
(FIVE YEARS 31)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Nanao Suzuki ◽  
Yu Wakaki ◽  
Kaori Watanabe ◽  
Yukiko Kumasaka ◽  
Rika Suzuki

Adhesions between the bladder and uterus necessitated an atypical incision in the cesarean section of a woman with endometriosis. This could not be predicted with pre-surgery MRI. .No methods in the literature are able to predict adhesions with true certainty; it is therefore still difficult to diagnose intra-abdominal adhesions


Author(s):  
Eun Seok Gil ◽  
Elton Aleksi ◽  
Lisa Spirio

Objective: To evaluate the effect of PuraStat (2.5% RADA16) administration on postoperative abdominal adhesion formation in an in vivo model.Methods: Anesthetized New Zealand white rabbits underwent cecal sidewall abrasion surgery in which the cecal serosa and juxtaposed parietal peritoneum were abraded after access through an abdominal midline incision. Eight animals were randomized to receive PuraStat administration at the interface of the injured tissues before incision closure, and five animals served as untreated controls. Treated animals received 3–12 ml PuraStat solution per lesion. Animals were sacrificed 14 days after surgery and examined for adhesion formation at the wound site.Results: At study terminus, adhesions were identified in 90% (9/10) of abraded cecum/peritoneal wound sites in untreated controls versus 25% (4/16) of PuraStat-treated sites (p = 0.004). Mean ± SD Total Adhesion Score (average of the values for extent + strength of the adhesion in both defects per animal; maximum score = 14 points) was significantly 76% lower in PuraStat-treated animals (2.0 ± 3.0 points) compared to untreated controls (8.2 ± 1.9 points) (p = 0.029). Mean adhesion coverage area of wound sites was 79% lower in PuraStat-treated animals than controls (p < 0.001), and mean adhesion durability was 72% lower in PuraStat-treated animals versus controls (p = 0.005). Remnant hydrogel was observed at the wound sites of 75% of treated animals at postoperative Day 14.Conclusion: PuraStat treatment has a positive protective effect in the cecal sidewall injury model, and significantly reduces abdominal adhesion formation at the interface of the injured cecum and overlying peritoneal sidewall defect.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Jia ◽  
Lihong Zhu

Pelvic abdominal adhesion is a major problem in obstetrics and gynecology. The occurrence of adhesion complications, the difficulty and risk of adhesion reoperation, and the problem of postoperative adhesion not only cause great trouble to the physical and mental health of patients, but also increase the economic burden for the family and social medical system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Lopes ◽  
Elisa Bitton ◽  
Elise Devries ◽  
Maria Pereira

Abstract Aim Demonstrate the performance and safety of TISSIUM on-demand activated adhesive for atraumatic hernia mesh fixation in a laparoscopic IPOM porcine model. Material and Methods Full thickness 4 cm in diameter excisional abdominal defects (n = 14) were created in pig (n = 8). The defects were repaired through laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh placement using commercial composite meshes fixed with TISSIUM adhesive (n = 8) or resorbable tacks (n = 6). The animals were sacrificed after 28 and 90 days. An independent pathologist evaluated abdominal adhesion, mesh shrinkage, local tissue tolerance and tissue ingrowth through histological analysis (H&E and Movat Pentacrome) at sacrifice. Fixation strength of the explanted abdominal walls was also assessed via burst-ball. Results No adverse events were observed at implantation or during the survival period. All the meshes were in place at sacrifice. Mesh shrinkage and abdominal adhesion scores were similar between the two groups. Histological analysis of the mesh demonstrated equivalent quality of tissue ingrowth and excellent local tissue tolerance with minimal/mild foreign body response and mononuclear cells inflammation. The repair strength, evaluated through a burst ball method 90 days after implantation, showed no significant difference between the TISSIUM adhesive and tacks. Usability is currently being evaluated in clinically relevant models. Conclusions In this preclinical study the TISSIUM adhesive demonstrated similar fixation strength and quality of repair when compared to commercial tacks. This technology has the potential to impact hernia procedures standardization and reduce pain often associated with current fixation technologies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Lopes ◽  
Elisa Bitton ◽  
Elise Devries ◽  
Maria Pereira

Abstract Aim Demonstrate the performance and safety of TISSIUM on-demand activated adhesive for atraumatic hernia mesh fixation in a laparoscopic IPOM porcine model. Material and Methods Full thickness 4 cm in diameter excisional abdominal defects (n = 14) were created in pig (n = 8). The defects were repaired through laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh placement using commercial composite meshes fixed with TISSIUM adhesive (n = 8) or resorbable tacks (n = 6). The animals were sacrificed after 28 and 90 days. An independent pathologist evaluated abdominal adhesion, mesh shrinkage, local tissue tolerance and tissue ingrowth through histological analysis (H&E and Movat Pentacrome) at sacrifice. Fixation strength of the explanted abdominal walls was also assessed via burst-ball. Results No adverse events were observed at implantation or during the survival period. All the meshes were in place at sacrifice. Mesh shrinkage and abdominal adhesion scores were similar between the two groups. Histological analysis of the mesh demonstrated equivalent quality of tissue ingrowth and excellent local tissue tolerance with minimal/mild foreign body response and mononuclear cells inflammation. The repair strength, evaluated through a burst ball method 90 days after implantation, showed no significant difference between the TISSIUM adhesive and tacks. Usability is currently being evaluated in clinically relevant models. Conclusions In this preclinical study the TISSIUM adhesive demonstrated similar fixation strength and quality of repair when compared to commercial tacks. This technology has the potential to impact hernia procedures standardization and reduce pain often associated with current fixation technologies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e56-e57
Author(s):  
Samuel P. Carmichael ◽  
Prafulla K. Chandra ◽  
John W. Vaughan ◽  
John B. Holcomb ◽  
Anthony J. Atala
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Yunhua Wu ◽  
Enmeng Li ◽  
Zijun Wang ◽  
Tianli Shen ◽  
Cong Shen ◽  
...  

Background. Postoperative abdominal adhesion remains one of the frequent complications after abdominal surgery and lacks effective intervention. Peritoneal mesothelial cell injury and healing play crucial roles in the process of adhesion formation, and identifying this mechanism might provide new insight into possible new therapeutic strategies for this disease. Transmembrane and immunoglobulin domain-containing 1 (TMIGD1) has been proven to protect renal epithelial cells from injury induced by oxidative stress and has also been identified as a novel adhesion molecule. Here, we investigated the role of TMIGD1 and its possible mechanism in adhesion formation. Materials and Methods. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), qPCR, and immunofluorescence (IHF) were used to detect the expression of TMIGD1. The grade and tenacity score of adhesion were used to evaluate the adhesion formation conditions. A TMIGD1-overexpressing HMrSV5 cell line was established. MTT assay, Western blotting, Annexin V apoptosis analysis, and CK19 staining were used to measure mesothelial cell viability, apoptosis, and completeness. ROS and MDA detection were used to measure mesothelial cell oxidative stress levels. JC-1 staining, IHF, and transmission electron microscopy were performed to assess mitochondrial function. Scratch-wound and adhesion assays were used to evaluate the adhesion ability of mesothelial cells. Results. First, we showed that TMIGD1 was decreased in mouse abdominal adhesion tissue and peritoneal mesothelial cells. Second, TMIGD1 overexpression inhibited adhesion formation. Third, TMIGD1 overexpression protected mesothelial cells from hydrogen peroxide- (H2O2-) induced oxidative stress injury. Fourth, TMIGD1 overexpression alleviated oxidative stress by protecting the mitochondrial function of mesothelial cells. In addition, TMIGD1 overexpression enhanced mesothelial cell adhesion. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that TMIGD1 protects mesothelial cells from oxidative stress injury by protecting their mitochondrial function, which is decreased in regular abdominal adhesion tissue. In addition, TMIGD1 enhances peritoneal mesothelial cell adhesion to promote healing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document