A Guide to the Library of Congress Classification, 5th ed., by Lois Mai Chan. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1999. 551p. (Library and Information Science Text Series) $65.00 (cloth: ISBN 1–56308-499–6). $49.00 (paper: ISBN 1–56308-500–3)

2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-291
Author(s):  
David Procházka
Author(s):  
Sharon Farnel ◽  
Denise Koufogiannakis ◽  
Sheila Laroque ◽  
Ian Bigelow ◽  
Anne Carr-Wiggin ◽  
...  

Appropriate subject access and descriptive practices within library and information science are social justice issues. Standards that are well established and commonly used in academic libraries in Canada and elsewhere, including Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Library of Congress Classification (LCC), continue to perpetuate colonial biases toward Indigenous peoples. In the fall of 2016, the University of Alberta Libraries (UAL) established a Decolonizing Description Working Group (DDWG) to investigate, define, and propose a plan of action for how descriptive metadata practices could more accurately, appropriately, and respectfully represent Indigenous peoples and contexts. The DDWG is currently beginning the implementation of recommendations approved by UAL’s strategic leadership team. In this paper we describe the genesis of the DDWG within the broader context of the libraries’ and the university’s responses to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s Calls to Action; outline the group’s activities and recommendations; and describe initial steps toward the implementation of those recommendations, with a focus on engaging local Indigenous communities. We reflect on the potential impact of revised descriptive practices in removing many of the barriers that Indigenous communities and individuals face in finding and accessing library materials relevant to their cultures and histories.


Author(s):  
Kelly Maria Ayala de Carvalho ◽  
Gustavo Silva Saldanha

This article, based on the bibliographic method, discussed the relationships of appropriation and use of the podcast in library and information science research. For this purpose, the theoretical movement first identified the boundaries of definition of the podcast and its context in the web 2.0, including its etymological origin, its concept, its historical course. At the empirical level, the study adopted the podcasting status in Library of Congress as the model for emerging contemporary discussions of the phenomenon. On the theoretical level, the discussion found in Paul Otlet's notion of "monographic principle" the epistemological-historical margins of understanding the role of the podcast as a concept and tool within the scope of library-information-informational thinking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document