Effect of smear layer removal on bleaching of human teeth in vitro

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 791-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Horn ◽  
M. Lamar Hicks ◽  
Janet Bulan-Brady
Author(s):  
Dasarapu Srujan ◽  
Gaurav Malhotra ◽  
Pradeep Shukla ◽  
Prerna Kataria ◽  
Mona Dagar

Background: Smear layer removal and collagen fiber exposure may improve regeneration which can be accomplished by use of root biomodifiers. These enhance the degree of connective tissue attachment to denuded roots. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare novel root canal irrigant and other root biomodifiers for smear layer removal on periodontally involved human teeth. Materials and Methods: Forty human teeth were collected and stored in saline. After scaling and root planing, two samples were obtained from each tooth. A total of 100 dentin blocks were randomly divided into four groups: Mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), tetracycline hydrochloride (TTC HCl), citric acid (CA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The agents were applied for 3 min by active burnishing. Immediately following treatment, the specimens were rinsed, dehydrated, fixed and prepared for scanning electron microscope and were examined at × 3500 magnification. Sampaio’s index was evaluated by the previously trained blind examiner using photomicrographs.  Groups  were  compared  using  analysis  of  variance  followed  by  Tukey’s  post?hoc  test. Results: Mixture of tetracycline, acid, and detergent is most efficacious in removing the smear layer and showed statistically significant dentinal tubules opening, followed by EDTA, TTC HCl, and CA. Conclusion: Mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent and conventional root biomodifiers used in the study alters the dentin surface by smear layer removal and exposure of dentinal tubules. Hence, MTAD as a root biomodifier may have a significant role in periodontal regeneration. Key words: Citric acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, MTAD, root biomodifier, scanning electron microscope study, tetracycline hydrochloride


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Neha S ◽  
◽  
Khurramuddin. M ◽  
Shekar K ◽  
Binoy Dola ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo Brugnera, Jr. ◽  
Danilo M. Zanello Guerisoli ◽  
Melissa A. Marchesan ◽  
Julio C. Emboava Spano ◽  
Jesus Djalma Pecora

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Ajay Chhabra ◽  
Apoorva Rana ◽  
Nisha Garg ◽  
Ruhani Bhatia ◽  
Shobit Sethi

INTRODUCTION: Irrigation is the vital part of root canal debridement. Usually post biomechanical preparation, the canal walls are covered by smear layer. It is important to remove this layer before obturation for better bond between the filling and walls. Conventional needle irrigation doesn’t give us adequate cleaning, therefore, new irrigation techniques are being tried to facilitate better smear layer removal. AIM: The aim was to evaluate and compare the smear layer removal by PATS,  EndoActivator device, Passive ultrasonic irrigation and side vent needle irrigation from canal walls. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  60 extracted mandibular premolars were instrumented up to 35/.04 with Heroshaper files. Samples were divided into 4 groups randomly before final irrigation as follows: Group I (n=15): Irrigation with side vent needles (Nexus ltd.,India), Group II (n=15): Irrigation with EndoActivator (Advanced Endodontics, Santa Barbara, CA ) Group III (n=15): Irrigation with PATS ( InnovationsEndo,India), Group IV (n=15): Irrigation with ultrasonic tips (Mani inc.). Teeth were split and one-half of each tooth was chosen for SEM examination.  The images were taken at apical third and scoring was done according to criteria by Torabinejad et al in 2003. Data obtained were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by Mann–Whitney U-test for individual comparison. RESULTS: All irrigating systems remove smear layer but PUI has better cleaning ability as compared to other groups. CONCLUSION: Passive ultrasonic irrigation shows better smear layer removal as compared to other techniques


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document