Predictors of short-term outcome in acute chest pain without ST-segment elevation

2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Sanchis ◽  
Vicent Bodı́ ◽  
Ángel Llácer ◽  
Lorenzo Facila ◽  
Julio Núñez ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Lavenburg ◽  
Michael Gannon ◽  
Brian O'Murchu ◽  
Vladimir Lakhter ◽  
Deborah L Crabbe ◽  
...  

Introduction: Initial reports suggest that patients may delay seeking medical attention during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Our aim was to determine if the COVID-19 outbreak is associated with a higher incidence of late presentations for patients with STEMI, greater need for mechanical circulatory support and PCI. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients that presented to a single, academic medical center with acute chest pain and ST-segment elevation on ECG from March 15 through June 17 in years 2019 and 2020. All patients were referred for emergent coronary angiography and the final cohort consisted of 32 patients. Medical records were reviewed to determine time between symptom onset and hospital arrival, need for PCI and/or mechanical circulatory support, total fluoroscopy time and volume of contrast administration during catheterization. Results: There was no significant difference in age, gender, cardiac risk factors or history of CAD between the cohorts that presented in 2019 compared with 2020 (Table 1). The mean time from symptom onset to arrival in the ED was 6.5 ± 8 and 9.2 ± 17 hours in 2019 and 2020 (p=0.55), respectively. PCI was performed during the index catheterization in 5 (50%) and 21 (95%) patients in 2019 and 2020 (p=0.01), respectively. Mean volume of contrast media used per case was 142 ± 65 ml in 2019 and 237 ± 104 ml in 2020 (p=0.017). There was a trend towards greater need for mechanical circulatory support and total fluoroscopy time during cases in 2020 (Table 1). Conclusions: In patients with suspected STEMI during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a trend towards longer duration between symptom onset and arrival to the ED. More patients presenting with ST-segment elevation required PCI and there was a trend towards greater utilization of mechanical circulatory support. These findings may reflect a decline in access to outpatient services and/or delays in patients seeking care for acute chest pain.


2020 ◽  
pp. 204887262092668
Author(s):  
Motoki Fukutomi ◽  
Kensaku Nishihira ◽  
Satoshi Honda ◽  
Sunao Kojima ◽  
Misa Takegami ◽  
...  

Background ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is known to be associated with worse short-term outcome than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, whether or not this trend holds true in patients with a high Killip class has been unclear. Methods We analyzed 3704 acute myocardial infarction patients with Killip II–IV class from the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and compared the short-term outcomes between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ( n = 2943) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ( n = 761). In addition, we also performed the same analysis in different age subgroups: <80 years and ≥80 years. Results In the overall population, there were no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality (20.0% vs 17.1%, p = 0.065) between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction groups. Patients <80 years of age also showed no difference in the in-hospital mortality (15.7% vs 15.2%, p = 0.807) between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ( n = 2001) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ( n = 453) groups, whereas among those ≥80 years of age, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ( n = 942) was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (29.3% vs 19.8%, p = 0.001) and in-hospital cardiac mortality (23.3% vs 15.0%, p = 0.002) than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ( n = 308). After adjusting for covariates, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was a significant predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.117; 95% confidence interval, 1.204–3.722; p = 0.009) in patients ≥80 years of age. Conclusion Among cases of acute myocardial infarction with a high Killip class, there was no marked difference in the short-term outcomes between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in younger patients, while ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction showed worse short-term outcomes in elderly patients than non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Future study identifying the prognostic factors for the specific anticipation intensive cares is needed in this high-risk group.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Consuegra-Sanchez ◽  
Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera ◽  
Manas K. Sinha ◽  
Paul O. Collinson ◽  
David C. Gaze ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Winkler ◽  
Sunit-Preet Chaudhry ◽  
Philip H. Stockwell

Acute myocardial infarction from septic embolization is a rare initial presentation of endocarditis. We report the case of a 67-year-old man who presented with acute chest pain, in whom emergency cardiac catheterization revealed findings that suggested coronary embolism. The patient was found to have Gemella endocarditis, with its initial presentation an embolic acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. We suggest that endocarditis be considered among the potential causes of acute myocardial infarction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document