scholarly journals SP-0614: How can we help patients to make a treatment choice that fits them best? (Shared decision making)

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S297
Author(s):  
J.J. Van Tol-Geerdink
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shona Horter ◽  
Beverley Stringer ◽  
Nell Gray ◽  
Nargiza Parpieva ◽  
Khasan Safaev ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Person-centred care, an internationally recognised priority, describes the involvement of people in their care and treatment decisions and the consideration of their needs and priorities within service delivery. Clarity is required regarding the feasibility of its implementation within different contexts. The standard multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment regimen is lengthy, toxic and insufficiently effective. 2019 World Health Organisation guidelines include a shorter (9-11-month) regimen and recommend that people with MDR-TB be involved in the choice of treatment option. We examine the perspectives and experiences of people with MDR-TB and health-care workers (HCW) on treatment choice in an MDR-TB programme in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan, run by Médecins Sans Frontières and the Ministry of Health. Methods: A qualitative study comprising 48 interviews with 24 people with MDR-TB and 20 HCW was conducted in June-July 2019. Participants were recruited purposively to include a range of treatment-taking experiences and professional positions. Interview data were analysed thematically using coding to identify emerging patterns, concepts, and categories relating to person-centred care, with Nvivo12. Results: People with MDR-TB were unfamiliar with shared decision-making and felt uncomfortable taking responsibility for their treatment choice. HCW were viewed as having greater knowledge and expertise, and patients trusted HCW to act in their best interests, deferring the choice of appropriate treatment course to them. HCW had concerns about involving people in treatment choices, preferring that doctors made decisions. People with MDR-TB wanted to be involved in discussions about their treatment, and have their preference sought, and were comfortable choosing whether treatment was ambulatory or hospital-based. Participants felt it important that people with MDR-TB had knowledge and understanding about their treatment and disease, to foster their sense of preparedness and ownership for treatment. Involving people in their care was said to motivate sustained treatment-taking, which some felt directly observed treatment (DOT) could undermine. Conclusions: There is a preference for doctors choosing the treatment regimen, linked to shared decision-making unfamiliarity and practitioner-patient knowledge imbalance. Involving people in their care, through discussions, information, and preference-seeking could foster ownership and self-responsibility, supporting sustained engagement with treatment, which DOT may contradict.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
Taral Patel ◽  
Servillano E. Dela Cruz ◽  
Maen A. Hussein ◽  
Michael J. Castine ◽  
...  

231 Background: Though FL generally has good outcomes, patients with high risk FL have poorer outcomes; proper risk stratification for early intervention has been shown to improve overall benefit in some patients. In a quality improvement (QI) initiative conducted in 4 community oncology systems, we assessed practice patterns involving prognostication and the integration of patient-disease-and treatment-related factors to improve decision-making for patients with FL. Methods: Between 10/17/2019 and 3/4/2020, we surveyed hematology/oncology health care professionals (HCP; N=59) to assess challenges, barriers, and self-reported performance of quality FL care. Electronic medical records (EMR) of 100 patients were audited for demographics, disease characteristics, risk stratification, treatment, and patient-centered metrics. To address suboptimal guideline-aligned care, teams participated in audit-feedback sessions to develop action plans for resolving identified gaps. Results: The EMR audit demonstrated low levels of documentation of staging, grade, and criteria required by risk stratification models (Table). Despite 92% of HCP indicating the use of risk stratification or prognostic models to determine treatment choice, only 23% of charts indicated use of a model for risk stratification. 55% of HCP indicated testing for t(14;18), though no patients had documented evidence of t(14;18) testing results. Survey findings indicated low confidence integrating patient-related factors to determine appropriate risk group (24%). Treatment choice was aligned with guidelines. In surveys, providers reported uncertainty about when to initiate treatment (13%), which treatments are most appropriate for each patient (23%), and engaging patients in shared decision-making (28%) as top barriers to care. During audit-feedback sessions, teams created action plans to improve documentation for variables of risk stratification, patient symptoms, molecular results, and shared decision-making. Further, teams identified the need for improved resources and personnel. Conclusions: These findings reveal important challenges to providing individualized FL care in community settings, such as documentation of clinically important metrics, care coordination, and engaging patients in shared decision-making. These gaps may inform future QI and implementation science initiatives. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. M. Stalmeier ◽  
M. S. Roosmalen ◽  
L. C. G. Josette Verhoef ◽  
E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers ◽  
J. C. Oosterwijk ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley M. Glynn ◽  
Lisa Dixon ◽  
Amy Cohen ◽  
Amy Drapalski ◽  
Deborah Medoff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document