Impact of systemic steroids combined with immunosuppressive treatment on glaucomatous features in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

AIM: To evaluate the incidence of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucomatous changes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in comparison with systemic steroids and immunosuppressive treatment. METHODS: Sixty-two women with SLE were divided into two groups: treated (n=47, 94 eyes) and not treated (n=15, 30 eyes) with systemic glucocorticosteroids (GC; GC-free). Twenty-one individuals in GC group were treated with immunosuppressive agents (immunomodulating and biologic). The visual acuity and IOP with ocular pulsatile amplitude (OPA) measurements, as well as scanning laser polarimetry (GDx) with nerve fiber index (NFI) measurement, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of the optic disk with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) analysis and the macular region with ganglion cell analysis (GCA) were performed. RESULTS: Mean IOP values in group with combined GC and immunosuppressive therapy was 15.8±2.56 mm Hg and was significantly lower than in individuals with exclusive GC treatment (17.63±4.38 mm Hg, P=0.043). Contrary, no differences in mean IOP values between GC-free group and individuals treated with combined GC and immunosuppressive therapy were detected (P=0.563). Similarly, mean IOP in GC was 17.14±3.94 mm Hg and in GC-free patients was equal to 16.67±3.45 mm Hg (P=0.671). According to treatment regimen no statistical differences in optic disk SD-OCT for RNFL thickness, RNFL symmetry, cupping volume and the C/D ratio were observed. Similarly, no statistical differences for the mean and minimal ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness measured in macular SD-OCT or NFI in GDx were detected. CONCLUSION: Combined immunosuppressive and systemic GC therapy in SLE patients may lower the risk of iatrogenic ocular hypertension. No relationship between treatment regimen and glaucomatous damage of optic nerve fibers in analyzed groups with SLE is detected.

Retrospective, observational study to see the effect of evogliptin on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in T2DM Indian patients: A real-world experience

This study aimed to assess effectiveness of Evogliptin 5 mg through continues glucose monitoring (CGM) in patients with T2DM in retrospective observational real world settings. Overall 6 patients who received Evogliptin as routine clinical practice in management of T2DM were analyzed retrospectively from single center. Data collected from past medical records. FreeStyle Librepro 1.0.6 was used for CGM. CGM was done 15 days prior to adding Evogliptin and repeated immediately after that for next 15 days. Mean BG level, Percentage time in target range (80-140mg/dl), Percentage time above target and Percentage time below target were assessed prior and after adding Evogliptin in existing treatment regimen. Significant reduction in Mean blood glucose level seen after adding Evogliptin in existing treatment regimen from 215 mg/dl to 138 mg/dl (-77 mg/dl P=0.006). Significant improvement seen in Percentage time in target range (80-140mg/dl) from 17% to 44% (27% P value 0.007) and in Percentage time above target from 81% to 43% (- 38%, P valve 0.003). 13.5 % of the patients seen below target. Evogliptin was found to be effective when added to the patients who were uncontrolled on other oral anti-diabetic medications. It effectively showed improvement in continues glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters like Mean blood glucose, more number of patients were in Time in Target range i.e (80-140mg/dl) after adding Evogliptin to existing anti-diabetic medications & well tolerated. Small sample size and retrospective study

Clinical, Epidemiological and Microbiological Profile of A Potentially Pathogenic Environmental Saprophyte, Burkholderia pseudomallei; at A Tertiary Care Hospital in Coastal India

Melioidosis is a severe systemic infectious disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, a gram-negative bacillus with bipolar staining. It is an environmental saprophyte endemic to Southeast Asia and Northern Australia. The disease can have varying manifestations. This is a retrospective study of the clinical and microbiological profile of culture-proven cases of melioidosis who presented to a tertiary care hospital in Coastal Karnataka between January 2018 and December 2020. The epidemiological, demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were studied and analyzed. A total of 27 cases were seen during the study period. All patients were from the western coastal areas of India. Fever was the most common presenting complaint. Analysis of the clinical manifestations showed 11 (40.74%) with bacteremia. Pneumonia was the most common primary clinical presentation with 11 cases (40.74%). 9 (33.3%) patients had an abscess in some part of the body on presentation. Secondary foci were seen in 5 (18.5%) patients. The prominent risk factors seen were history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, age >40 years, alcoholism and smoking. 13 (48.15%) were started with the treatment regimen for melioidosis. Only 8 (29.63%) were prescribed the eradication treatment regimen. One case which was inadequately treated came back with reactivation of melioidosis. Varied clinical presentation of melioidosis makes the specific clinical diagnosis difficult. Due to the high mortality and morbidity rate, early diagnosis and prompt management is warranted, this requires clinical vigilance and an intensive microbiological workup. Lack of adherence to the treatment protocol can lead to reactivation.

Empagliflozin—A New Chance for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

The heart failure (HF) epidemic is one of the challenges that has been faced by the healthcare system worldwide for almost 25 years. With an ageing world population and a fast-paced lifestyle that promotes the development of cardiovascular disease, the number of people suffering from heart failure will continue to rise. To improve the treatment regimen and consequently the prognosis and quality of life of heart failure patients, new therapeutic solutions have been introduced, such as an inclusion of Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in a new treatment regimen as announced by the European Society of Cardiology in August 2021. This article focuses on the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin and its use in patients with heart failure. Empagliflozin is a drug originally intended for the treatment of diabetes due to its glycosuric properties, yet its beneficial effects extend beyond lowering glycemia. The pleiotropic effects of the drug include nephroprotection, improving endothelial function, lowering blood pressure and reducing body weight. In this review we discuss the cardioprotective mechanism of the drug in the context of the benefits of empagliflozin use in patients with chronic cardiac insufficiency. Numerous findings confirm that despite its potential limitations, the use of empagliflozin in HF treatment is advantageous and effective.

Incautious Use of Antibiotics During Covid-19

The severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus (SARSCoV-2), the etiologic agent of the most detrimental disease of the century, has tragically influenced the world dynamics. One of the major challenges faced by health sector globally, was to establish a treatment regimen and guidelines to combat this lethal condition

Increased Moxifloxacin Dosing among MDR-TB Patients with Low-Level Resistance to Moxifloxacin did not Improve Treatment Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center in Mumbai, India

Background Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains resistant to isoniazid and rifampin (MDR-TB) are increasingly reported worldwide, requiring renewed focus on the nuances of drug resistance. Patients with low-level moxifloxacin resistance may benefit from higher doses, but limited clinical data on this strategy are available . Methods We conducted a 5-year observational cohort study of MDR-TB patients at a tertiary care center in India. Participants with Mtb isolates resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, and moxifloxacin (at the 0.5µg/mL threshold) were analyzed according to receipt of high-dose moxifloxacin (600mg daily) as part of a susceptibility-guided treatment regimen. Univariable and multivariable cox proportional hazard models assessed the relationship between high-dose moxifloxacin and unfavorable treatment outcomes. Results Of 354 participants with MDR-TB resistant to moxifloxacin, 291 (82.2%) received high-dose moxifloxacin. The majority experienced good treatment outcomes (200, 56.5%), which was similar between groups (56.7% vs. 54.0%, p=0.74). Unfavorable outcomes were associated with greater extent of radiographic disease, lower initial body mass index, and concurrent treatment with fewer drugs with confirmed phenotypic susceptibility. Treatment with high-dose moxifloxacin was not associated with improved outcomes in either unadjusted [hazard ratio (HR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.6–2.4] or adjusted models (HR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.5–1.4) or but was associated with joint pain (HR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.2–8.8). Conclusion In a large observational cohort, adding high-dose (600mg) moxifloxacin to a DST-based treatment regimen for MDR-TB was associated with increased treatment-associated side effects without improving overall outcomes and should be avoided for empiric treatment of moxifloxacin resistant MDR-TB.

Investigation of two treatment regimens in adults with mild asthma

<p>Introduction In adults with mild-moderate asthma, poor adherence to daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) leads to increased asthma symptoms and risk of asthma exacerbations. There is evidence that symptom-driven use of a combination ICS plus a fast-onset long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) inhaler taken as needed may be an alternative to daily maintenance ICS plus as-needed short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA). Through four studies: The PRACTICAL study (a randomised controlled trial) and three sub-studies nested within it, this thesis aims to investigate the efficacy of as-needed ICS-formoterol (a fast-onset LABA), exposure to and patterns of ICS and beta2-agonist use, and patient preferences for and priorities concerning their asthma management. Methods The PRACTICAL study was a 52 week, open label, parallel group, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial conducted at 15 sites throughout New Zealand. Adults aged 18-75 with a diagnosis of asthma who were taking SABA for symptom relief with or without low dose maintenance ICS were recruited. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either as-needed budesonide-formoterol (200/6mcg) one actuation for symptom relief or budesonide (200mcg) one actuation twice a day plus as-needed terbutaline (250mcg) two actuations for symptom relief. A sub-group of 110 participants had electronic inhaler monitors attached to their study inhalers which captured the time and date of every inhaler actuation. At their final study visit a total of 407 participants were eligible to complete a survey on their treatment preferences and experiences of their study randomised treatment, and a discrete choice experiment to determine their priorities for attributes of asthma management including; treatment regimen, shortness of breath, steroid dose and likelihood of an asthma flare-up. Results The PRACTICAL study found the rate of severe exacerbations per patient per year was lower in participants randomised to as-needed budesonide-formoterol than participants randomised to maintenance budesonide (absolute rate per patient per year 0.119 vs 0.172; relative rate 0.69; 95%CI 0.48-1.00; p=0.049). Within the electronic monitoring sub-study, exposure to ICS was significantly lower in the group randomised to as-needed budesonide-formoterol with a mean daily ICS dose of 176.0mcg versus 302.5mcg in those randomised to maintenance budesonide (difference -126.5mcg per day; 95%CI -171.0 to -81.9; p<0.001). Use of as-needed budesonide-formoterol was associated with extended periods of no ICS use (median 156 days vs 22 days respectively) and more days where ≥4, 6 or 8 actuations of ICS were taken than maintenance budesonide. Participants’ preference for either as-needed or maintenance treatment was strongly associated with randomised treatment; 90% randomised to as-needed budesonideformoterol preferred their randomised treatment compared to 60% of those randomised to maintenance budesonide, odds ratio for association between randomised treatment and preference was 13.3 (95%CI 7.1 to 24.7; p<0.001). The DCE found that amount of shortness of breath was the most important attribute of asthma treatment to all participants. However, the relative importance of other attributes, particularly type of treatment regimen, varied depending on whether the participants had previously stated a preference for as-needed or maintenance treatment. Discussion In adults with mild-moderate asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol is more effective at preventing severe asthma exacerbations than maintenance budesonide at a significantly lower exposure to ICS, despite long periods of no ICS use. This suggests that timing of ICS dose and titrating it in response to symptoms is more important than total dose. If participants have experienced as-needed budesonide-formoterol, they prefer it over maintenance budesonide suggesting this new approach to asthma treatment will be acceptable to patients. Control of shortness of breath was the most important attribute of asthma treatment to all patients. However, participants who preferred as-needed treatment were more willing to trade-off likelihood of an asthma flare up and steroid dose for their preferred treatment regimen. Knowledge of patient preferences and priorities for treatment, together with knowledge of regimen characteristics can be used in discussion with patients to determine the most appropriate regimen for them.</p>