scholarly journals EP-1427: A comparative study of the normal oesophageal wall thickness based on 3DCT, 4DCT and CBCT

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S776
Author(s):  
S.C.H.&.I. Chaoyue Hu ◽  
S.C.H.&.I. Jianbin Li ◽  
S.C.H.&.I. Jinzhi Wang ◽  
S.C.H.&.I. Qian Shao ◽  
S.C.H.&.I. Wei Wang ◽  
...  
Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (45) ◽  
pp. e22553
Author(s):  
Chao Yue Hu ◽  
Yan Kang Li ◽  
Jian Bin Li ◽  
Jin Zhi Wang ◽  
Qian Shao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 580-583 ◽  
pp. 2000-2006
Author(s):  
Lei Hu ◽  
He Gao Wu ◽  
Chang Zheng Shi ◽  
Ying Han Xie

In this paper, differences by using selected three typical specifications—DL/T 5141-2001 (Chinese), ASCE No.79 in the version of 1993(American) and ASCE No.79 in the version of 2012 (American)—in structural design of exposed steel penstock were explored. A practical example about exposed penstock laid on ground applied in hydropower station was also used to analyze specifications clearly. The result shows that the main differences between Chinese and American specifications are allowable stress and load combination. The former is direct factor of calculating exposed penstock shell thickness. Therefore, ASCE No.79 (2012) designs the minimum wall thickness, followed by DL/T 5141-2001 and the last is ASCE No.79 (1993), which is correspondingly contrary to sort by allowable stress. Basically, ASCE No.79 (2012) defines lower safety coefficient for exposed penstock, which is identical with authoritative rules of pressure vessels in the U.S.A and EU. The safety of DL/T 5141-2001 has been proved via rich engineering experience and this specification is recommended for Chinese projects. Besides, ASCE No.79 (2012) is recommended.


1977 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 1223-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Halpern ◽  
Joshua Varon ◽  
Dennis C. Leiner ◽  
Duncan T. Moore

2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M Venter ◽  
R R de Swardt ◽  
S Kyriacou

A comparative study to map the residual strain/stress states through the walls of autofrettaged thick-walled steel cylinders has been conducted with neutron diffraction, Sachs boring and the compliance methods. Test samples with different wall thickness ratios were prepared to have significant amounts of reverse yielding due to the Bauschinger effect. All three methods indicate that the autofrettage action primarily influenced the hoop stresses, which varied rapidly close to the bores from compressive to tensile within the first half of the wall thickness. Quantitatively, results from the neutron diffraction and Sachs boring techniques compare favourably across large regions of the cylinder walls, while the compliance results showed different features. The existence of reverse yielding close to the cylinder bores has been sensed to different magnitudes and distances from the bores. Plastically yielded material regions identified from the neutron diffraction results correlated well with theoretical modelling.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document