PH-0263 Pre-clinical vs. clinical 4D accumulated proton dose delivery for thoracic tumours with large motion

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S169-S171
Author(s):  
C.O. Ribeiro ◽  
E.W. Korevaar ◽  
S. Visser ◽  
A.C. Hengeveld ◽  
G.G. Marmitt ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part23) ◽  
pp. 3292-3292
Author(s):  
J Polf ◽  
F Poenisch ◽  
S Peterson ◽  
J Wilkinson ◽  
M Rozner ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
J MORAN ◽  
M ELSHAIKH ◽  
T LAWRENCE
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-axel Johansson ◽  
Sören Mattsson ◽  
Anders Brahme ◽  
Jörgen Carlsson ◽  
Björn Zackrisson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S292-S293
Author(s):  
U. Bernchou ◽  
R.L. Christiansen ◽  
D. Tilly ◽  
A. Bertelsen ◽  
H.L. Riis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Whitmore ◽  
R. I. Mackay ◽  
M. van Herk ◽  
J. K. Jones ◽  
R. M. Jones

AbstractThis paper presents the first demonstration of deeply penetrating dose delivery using focused very high energy electron (VHEE) beams using quadrupole magnets in Monte Carlo simulations. We show that the focal point is readily modified by linearly changing the quadrupole magnet strength only. We also present a weighted sum of focused electron beams to form a spread-out electron peak (SOEP) over a target region. This has a significantly reduced entrance dose compared to a proton-based spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Very high energy electron (VHEE) beams are an exciting prospect in external beam radiotherapy. VHEEs are less sensitive to inhomogeneities than proton and photon beams, have a deep dose reach and could potentially be used to deliver FLASH radiotherapy. The dose distributions of unfocused VHEE produce high entrance and exit doses compared to other radiotherapy modalities unless focusing is employed, and in this case the entrance dose is considerably improved over existing radiations. We have investigated both symmetric and asymmetric focusing as well as focusing with a range of beam energies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 5279-5285
Author(s):  
Angelo D. Bonzanini ◽  
Joel A. Paulson ◽  
David B. Graves ◽  
Ali Mesbah

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-171
Author(s):  
Shingo Ohira ◽  
Naoyuki Kanayama ◽  
Riho Komiyama ◽  
Toshiki Ikawa ◽  
Masayasu Toratani ◽  
...  

Abstract The immobilization of patients with a bite block (BB) carries the risk of interpersonal infection, particularly in the context of pandemics such as COVID-19. Here, we compared the intra-fractional patient setup error (intra-SE) with and without a BB during fractionated intracranial stereotactic irradiation (STI). Fifteen patients with brain metastases were immobilized using a BB without a medical mask, while 15 patients were immobilized without using a BB and with a medical mask. The intra-SEs in six directions (anterior–posterior (AP), superior–inferior (SI), left–right (LR), pitch, roll, and yaw) were calculated by using cone-beam computed tomography images acquired before and after the treatments. We analyzed a total of 53 and 67 treatment sessions for the with- and without-BB groups, respectively. A comparable absolute mean translational and rotational intra-SE was observed (P > 0.05) in the AP (0.19 vs 0.23 mm with- and without-BB, respectively), SI (0.30 vs 0.29 mm), LR (0.20 vs 0.29 mm), pitch (0.18 vs 0.27°), roll (0.23 vs 0.23°) and yaw (0.27 vs 22°) directions. The resultant planning target volume (PTV) margin to compensate for intra-SE was <1 mm. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the intra-SE and treatment times. A PTV margin of <1 mm was achieved even when patients were immobilized without a BB during STI dose delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document