152: Organ at Risk Dose Constraints in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review of Active Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. S64-S65
Author(s):  
Serenna G. Gerhard ◽  
David A. Palma ◽  
Andrew J. Arifin ◽  
Alexander V. Louie ◽  
George J. Li ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e355-e365
Author(s):  
Serenna G. Gerhard ◽  
David A. Palma ◽  
Andrew J. Arifin ◽  
Alexander V. Louie ◽  
George J. Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Armstrong ◽  
Ruben GW Quek ◽  
Steve Ryder ◽  
Janine Ross ◽  
Titas Buksnys ◽  
...  

Background: Ongoing clinical trials are investigating poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to target the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway in prostate cancer. DDR mutation screening will guide treatment strategy and assess eligibility for clinical trials. Materials & methods: This systematic review estimated the rate of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling among men with or at risk of prostate cancer. Results: From 6856 records, one study fulfilled the inclusion criteria and described men undiagnosed with prostate cancer with a family history of BRCA1/2 mutation who received DDR mutation testing. Conclusion: With only one study included in this first systematic review of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling in men with or at risk of prostate cancer, more research is warranted.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1430-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Darvish ◽  
M. Ghorbani ◽  
S. Hosseini Teshnizi ◽  
N. Roozbeh ◽  
F. Seif ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e0009302
Author(s):  
Sauman Singh-Phulgenda ◽  
Prabin Dahal ◽  
Roland Ngu ◽  
Brittany J. Maguire ◽  
Alice Hawryszkiewycz ◽  
...  

Background Despite a historical association with poor tolerability, a comprehensive review on safety of antileishmanial chemotherapies is lacking. We carried out an update of a previous systematic review of all published clinical trials in visceral leishmaniasis (VL) from 1980 to 2019 to document any reported serious adverse events (SAEs). Methods For this updated systematic review, we searched the following databases from 1st Jan 2016 through 2nd of May 2019: PUBMED, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and the Global Index Medicus. We included randomised and non-randomised interventional studies aimed at assessing therapeutic efficacy and extracted the number of SAEs reported within the first 30 days of treatment initiation. The incidence rate of death (IRD) from individual treatment arms were combined in a meta-analysis using random effects Poisson regression. Results We identified 157 published studies enrolling 35,376 patients in 347 treatment arms. Pentavalent antimony was administered in 74 (21.3%), multiple-dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in 52 (15.0%), amphotericin b deoxycholate in 51 (14.7%), miltefosine in 33 (9.5%), amphotericin b fat/lipid/colloid/cholesterol in 31 (8.9%), and single-dose L-AmB in 17 (4.9%) arms. There was a total of 804 SAEs reported of which 793 (including 428 deaths) were extracted at study arm level (11 SAEs were reported at study level only). During the first 30 days, there were 285 (66.6%) deaths with the overall IRD estimated at 0.068 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.041–0.114; I2 = 81.4%; 95% prediction interval (PI): 0.001–2.779] per 1,000 person-days at risk; the rate was 0.628 [95% CI: 0.368–1.021; I2 = 82.5%] in Eastern Africa, and 0.041 [95% CI: 0.021–0.081; I2 = 68.1%] in the Indian Subcontinent. In 21 study arms which clearly indicated allowing the inclusion of patients with HIV co-infections the IRD was 0.575 [95% CI: 0.244–1.355; I2 = 91.9%] compared to 0.043 [95% CI: 0.020–0.090; I2 = 62.5%] in 160 arms which excluded HIV co-infections. Conclusion Mortality within the first 30 days of VL treatment initiation was a rarely reported event in clinical trials with an overall estimated rate of 0.068 deaths per 1,000 person-days at risk, though it varied across regions and patient populations. These estimates may serve as a benchmark for future trials against which mortality data from prospective and pharmacovigilance studies can be compared. The methodological limitations exposed by our review support the need to assemble individual patient data (IPD) to conduct robust IPD meta-analyses and generate stronger evidence from existing trials to support treatment guidelines and guide future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 30-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romaana Mir ◽  
Sarah M. Kelly ◽  
Ying Xiao ◽  
Alisha Moore ◽  
Catharine H. Clark ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. e60-e66 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Yang ◽  
R. Mir ◽  
P. Díez ◽  
Y. Tsang ◽  
J. Conibear ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Hemant Thacker ◽  
Rajeev Chawla ◽  
Navneet Agrawal ◽  
Rohit Kapoor ◽  
Noel Somasundaram ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seyed Reza Mirhafez ◽  
Mitra Hariri

Abstract. L-arginine is an important factor in several physiological and biochemical processes. Recently, scientists studied L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). We conducted a systematic review on randomized controlled trials assessing L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators. We searched data bases including Google scholar, ISI web of science, SCOPUS, and PubMed/Medline up to April 2019. Randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of L-arginine on inflammatory mediators in human adults were included. Our search retrieved eleven articles with 387 participants. Five articles were on patients with cancer and 6 articles were on adults without cancer. L-arginine was applied in enteral form in 5 articles and in oral form in 6 articles. Eight articles were on both genders, two articles were on women, and one article was on men. L-arginine could not reduce inflammatory mediators among patients with and without cancer except one article which indicated that taking L-arginine for 6 months decreased IL-6 among cardiopathic nondiabetic patients. Our results indicated that L-arginine might not be able to reduce selected inflammatory mediators, but for making a firm decision more studies are needed to be conducted with longer intervention duration, separately on male and female and with different doses of L-arginine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document