728 PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION IN HBSAG-NEGATIVE PATIENTS AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY WITH RITUXIMAB: HBV-DNA MONITORING AND ENTECAVIR PROPHYLAXIS

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. S292
Author(s):  
H. Kojima ◽  
H. Tsujimura ◽  
N. Mimura ◽  
T. Sugawara ◽  
M. Ise ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1944-1944
Author(s):  
Hideaki Fujiwara ◽  
Kosei Matsue

Abstract Abstract 1944 Poster Board I-967 Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients receiving chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy, and organ transplantation is well-recognized complication in patients with HBsAg positive patients. Although, prophylaxis with anti-viral drug is proposed for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients and is considered as a standard managements, the risk of developing HBV reactivation and optimal therapy in HBsAg negative but anti-HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) positive patients remained to be elucidated. In addition the use of rituximab has been reported to cause even fatal HBV related hepatic failure in these patients. We retrospectively investigated the occurrence of HBV reactivation after rituximab containing chemotherapy in HBsAg negative 261 consecutive patients with CD20 positive B-cell lymphoma who admitted Kameda General Hospital over past 5 years. Prior to September 2006, anti-HBc and antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) were performed at the discretion of the treating physician. After October 2006, anti-HBc and anti-HBs tests were performed for all patients. HBV reactivation was defined by the seroconversion from HBsAg negative to positive with or without an increase of HBV-DNA from base line levels (>2.6 log copies/ml). Hepatitis attributable to reactivation was defined as a serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level greater than 3 folds above the normal upper limit of 2 consecutive determinations more than 5 days apart without feature of hepatitis A, hepatitis C or other causes. Lymphoma subtypes were diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 162 cases, 61%), follicular lymphoma (FL; 58 cases, 22%), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 11 cases, 4%), Burkitt lymphoma (BL; 6 cases, 2%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; 6 cases, 2%), and other B cell lymphomas (18 cases, 7%) and various courses and treatments containing rituximab were performed such as CHOP, ESHAP, hyper-CVAD etc. Among the 261 patients, the prevalence of HBsAg positive is 9 (3.4%) and all of them were successfully treated by rituximab containing regimens and concurrent use of antiviral agents without development of severe hepatitis. Twenty-two patients were not tested both anti-HBc and anti-HBs before rituximab administration. Therefore, 230 patients were tested both HBsAg and anti-HBc before treatment. Fifty-six of 230 patients (24.3%) were isolated anti-HBc positive and the rest of 174 patients were anti-HBc negative. Anti-HBc IgM was tested in 29 of 56 anti-HBc positive patients and all of the 29 patients were negative for anti-HBc IgM. Anti-HBs was positive in 5/174 patients (2.8%) and 36/56 patients (65.4%) in anti-HBc negative patients and positive patients, respectively. Among 56 patients with positive anti-HBc, 5 patients (13.9%) became HBsAg positive after rituximab containing therapy, while none of 174 patients with negative anti-HBc became positive for HBsAg with median follow up of 24 months. Among 5 patients with HBV reactivation, 4 patients were isolated anti-HBc and one patient who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation was both anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive before the start of rituximab, although his anti-HBs decline and disappeared after transplantation with the use of prednisone for chronic GVHD. All of the 5 patients received entecavir on detection of HBsAg and showed prompt decrease of HBV-DNA, however, 4 of 5 patients exhibited mild to moderate elevation of ALT. None of them developed fulminant hepatic failure. We conclude that patients with isolated anti-HBc are at high risk for HBV reactivation (p=0.011, by Fisher's exact test) and should be monitored closely for HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBV-DNA, transaminase levels during and after rituximab containing treatment. Although preemptive use of entecavir from detection of HBsAg or HBV-DNA enabled us to manage hepatitis B virus reactivation and liver injury successfully, mild to moderate hepatic flare could not prevented in our patients. Therefore, these approaches should be further evaluated in the context of clinical usefulness, safety, cost-effectiveness. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1359-1359
Author(s):  
Gao Yan ◽  
Jianqiu Wu ◽  
Yunhong Huang ◽  
Hui Zhou ◽  
Ru Feng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Indolent B-cell lymphoma (iBCL) are clinically heterogeneous and accounts for 10-15% of all kind of subtypes in NHL in China. Although iBCL have a relatively good survival, majority of these lymphomas is considered incurable. The favorable activity and safety profile of rituximab monotherapy in the initial treatment of iBCL has been proven. Interferon alpha (IFN-α) has been proven to be effective in modulating immune responses and may enhance the clinical responses to rituximab in vitro and in vivo studies. Clinical combination of rituximab and IFN-α was associated with fewer early treatment failures compared to single agent rituximab. Peginterferon-α-2(peg-IFN-α2) has a longer half-life with less toxicity. It also is one of the options for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection. Therefore, we hypothesized that peg-IFN-α2 may synergize with rituximab and would minimize or eliminate minimal residual disease (MRD). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety for this combination in pts(pts) with treatment-naive iBCL. Methods: This trial enrolled eligible pts aged 18-80 years with newly diagnosed iBCL including FL(grade 1-2,3a) and MZL. Pts were eligible if they had ECOG ≤ 2, adequate organ function and bone marrow function, and at least one measurable or evaluable lesion. Further eligibility criteria were HBsAg positivity with HBV DNA load <3000 IU/mL prior to study; serum ALT level of <5 times the upper limit of normal. During induction phase, pts received rituximab biosimilar (Henliritux ® Shanghai Henlius Biotech) 375 mg/m 2 intravenous infusion on d1. Peg-IFN-α2b (Pegberon ®, Xiamen Amoytop Biotech) was given at a dose of 135ug, subcutaneously, on d1,8. The combination repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles. Responded pts receive rituximab (every 2 months) plus peg-IFN-α2b (every month) maintenance at the dose described above, for up to 2 years until disease progression and intolerance. Simultaneously, CHB pts orally treated with entecavir continuously. The primary endpoint is ORR assessed by investigators per Lugano 2014 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included TTR, DOR, PFS, OS, HBV DNA load clearance, and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized according to NCI CTCAE v5.0. All pts' blood samples were collected for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment before treatment in each of cycles. ctDNA samples were analyzed by capture-based NGS targeting 475 lymphoma- and cancer- relevant genes. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04246359). Results: From January 2020 to July 2021, 52 eligible pts with median age of 54 (range, 29-75) years were enrolled from 6 institutions in China. Thirty (54.5%) are female, 20(36.4%) pts were symptomatic and 22(40.7%) pts with FLIPI score≥3, 6(10.9%) pts suffer from hepatitis B with HBV DNA load <3000 IU/mL at study entry. At cutoff date, there were 25(46.3%) FL (grade 1-2), 19(35.2%) MALT, 8(14.8%) FL (grade 3a) pts enrolled. Of 50 response evaluable pts, 31(62.0%) pts achieved an objective response including 19(38.0%) pts with CR based on investigators. ORR were 58.3% (14/24), 75.0% (6/8), 61.1% (11/18) and the CR rates were 29.2% (7/24), 62.5% (5/8), 38.9% (7/18), 0,0 for FL (grade 1-2), FL (grade3a), MALT respectively. Median HBV DNA load clearance time was 1.8 months (1.3-2.1months), no hepatitis B virus reactivation reported. With median follow-up time was 6.2 months (range: 1.4-18.3 months), median OS, PFS and DoR was not reached; 6-month OS and PFS rate of whole cohort was 96.7±3.3%, 85.3±6.1%, respectively. Median TTR was 3.0months (1.5-5.2months). Dynamics ctDNA assay is in progress, data in detail will be reported at the ASH conference. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hematological relevance toxicities. The most common grade hematological TEAEs (>30%) were neutropenia 63.5%, anemia 34.6%, thrombocytopenia 28.8%. Non-hematological TEAEs (>10%) were fever (28.8%), transaminase elevated (28.8%), fatigue (26.9%), infusion reaction (17.4%). Most common grade 3-4 TEAEs (>5%) were neutropenia(17.3%), anemia (7.7%). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion: Rituximab biosimilar plus pegylated interferon α-2b provided favorable response in newly diagnosed advanced iBCL and was well tolerated. No hepatitis B virus reactivation was observed. Further investigation is warranted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Pompili ◽  
Maria Basso ◽  
Stefan Hohaus ◽  
Giulia Bosco ◽  
Lorenzo Nosotti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoguang Wang ◽  
Xiaodan Yang ◽  
Haitao Yu ◽  
Zhengwei Song ◽  
Fei Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To investigate the clinical features of hepatitis B virus(HBV) reactivation after transcatheter arteriaI chemoembolization (TACE) treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and analyze the relationship between hepatitis B virus reactivation and clinicopathological factors and prognosis. Methods: Clinical data of 108 patients with HCC treated by TACE from January 2006 to January 2014 were retrospectively studied. The relationship between the clinical data and HBV reactivation were analyzed and the differences in survival rates between the reactivation group and the non-reactivation group were also compared. Results: 42 (38.9%) patients developed HBV reactivation. The reactivation rate in patients with HBV DNA ≥ 104 was 65.8% (25/38), and was much higher than that of the patients with HBV DNA < 104 (24.3%, 17/70). The cellular immune function of reactivation group was significantly lower than that of non-reactivation group(P < 0.01). There was a significant difference (P=0.03) in 2-year survival rate between the activated and non-activated groups, and their survival rates were 35.9% and 53.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Some patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma may have hepatitis B virus reactivation after receiving TACE treatment, and positive HBV DNA, immunosuppression were the risk factors for the development of HBV reactivation. Patients with hepatitis B virus reactivation after TACE have poor prognosis. The study suggests that antiviral therapy and immunoenhancer were necessary to improve curative effect and survival rate in HCC patients who underwent TACE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document