Pre-procedural blood product transfusion and bleeding predictors in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing elective invasive procedures at a tertiary liver unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. S727
Author(s):  
Jonathan Durbin ◽  
Homoyon Mehrzad ◽  
James Ferguson ◽  
Debashis Haldar
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (06) ◽  
pp. 704-715
Author(s):  
Natasha Janko ◽  
Ammar Majeed ◽  
William Kemp ◽  
Stuart K. Roberts

AbstractViscoelastic point-of-care (VET POC) tests provide a global assessment of hemostasis and have an increasing role in the management of bleeding and blood component delivery across several clinical settings. VET POC tests have a rapid turnaround time, provide a better overall picture of hemostasis, predict bleeding more accurately than conventional coagulation tests, and reduce blood component usage and health care costs. Despite commonly having abnormal conventional coagulation tests, most patients with chronic liver disease have a “rebalanced” hemostasis. However, this hemostatic balance is delicate and these patients are predisposed to both bleeding and thromboembolic events. Over recent years, VET POC tests have been increasingly studied for their potential as better functional tests of hemostasis in liver disease patients. This review provides a background on the most common VET POC tests (thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry) and discusses the current evidence for these tests in the prediction and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease, and in liver resection and transplant. With the recent publication of several randomized controlled trials, there is growing evidence that VET POC tests may be used to improve bleeding risk assessment and reduce blood product use in liver disease patients outside of the transplant setting. However, consensus is still lacking regarding the VET POC tests' thresholds that should be used to trigger blood product transfusion. VET POC tests also show promise in predicting thrombosis in patients with liver disease, but further research is needed before they can be used to guide anticoagulant therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Azizullah Beran ◽  
Sami Ghazaleh ◽  
Mohammed Mhanna ◽  
Omar Srour ◽  
Justin Chuang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3294
Author(s):  
Marie-Astrid van Dievoet ◽  
Stéphane Eeckhoudt ◽  
Xavier Stephenne

Changes in primary hemostasis have been described in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis and are still subject to ongoing debate. Thrombocytopenia is common and multifactorial. Numerous studies also reported platelet dysfunction. In spite of these changes, primary hemostasis seems to be balanced. Patients with CLD and cirrhosis can suffer from both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Variceal bleeding is the major hemorrhagic complication and is mainly determined by high portal pressure. Non portal hypertension-related bleeding due to hemostatic failure is uncommon. Thrombocytopenia can complicate management of invasive procedures in CLD patients. Recently, oral thrombopoietin agonists have been approved to raise platelets before invasive procedures. In this review we aim to bundle literature, published over the past decade, discussing primary hemostasis in CLD and cirrhosis including (1) platelet count and the role of thrombopoietin (TPO) agonists, (2) platelet function tests and markers of platelet activation, (3) von Willebrand factor and (4) global hemostasis tests.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (06) ◽  
pp. 682-692
Author(s):  
Saro Khemichian ◽  
Norah A. Terrault

AbstractThrombocytopenia is one of the most common hematologic complications in cirrhosis. Despite limited data linking platelet count and bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis, the use of platelets transfusions for invasive procedures has been a common practice. Recently, thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists have been approved for use in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to review current literature on bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis and the use of platelet transfusions and TPO receptor agonists in the context of invasive procedures. PubMed search was conducted to find articles relating to cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, and new novel treatments for this condition. Search terms included CLD, cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, bleeding, thrombosis, coagulopathy, hemostasis, and TPO receptor agonists. Romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag are approved TPO receptor agonists, with avatrombopag and lusutrombopag specifically approved for use in patients with CLD undergoing invasive procedures. In patients with platelet counts < 50,000/mm3, avatrombopag and lusutrombopag increased the platelet counts above this threshold in the majority of treated patients and reduced the frequency of platelet transfusions. At the approved doses, incidence of thrombosis was not increased and therapies were well tolerated. Studies were not powered to assess whether risk of bleeding complications was reduced and the fundamental question of whether correction of thrombocytopenia is warranted in patients undergoing invasive procedures remains unanswered. The use of TPO receptor agonists has resulted in less requirement for platelet transfusions. In patients with cirrhosis undergoing invasive procedures for whom platelet transfusion is planned, TPO receptor agonists are an alternative and avoid the risks associated with transfusions. However, there is need for a thoughtful approach to manage bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis undergoing procedures, with the consideration of a comprehensive hemostatic profile, the severity of portal hypertension, and the complexity of the invasive procedure to guide decisions regarding transfusions or use of TPO receptor agonists.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nomoto ◽  
Naoki Morimoto ◽  
Kouichi Miura ◽  
Shunji Watanabe ◽  
Yoshinari Takaoka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic liver disease (CLD) is often complicated by severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/µL). Platelet transfusion has been a gold standard for increasing the platelet count to prevent hemorrhagic events in such patients. Lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, can increase the platelet count in such patients when invasive procedures are scheduled. Former studies on lusutrombopag included patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL at baseline: the proportions of patients who did not require platelet transfusion were 84–96%, which might be overestimated. Methods The efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag were retrospectively investigated in CLD patients with platelet count of < 50,000/µL, a criterion for platelet transfusion, in real-world settings. We examined the proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion in 31 CLD patients, which exceeded a minimum required sample size (21 patients) calculated by 80% power at a significance level of 5%. Lusutrombopag, 3 mg once daily, was administered 8–18 days before scheduled invasive procedures. Results Among 31 patients who received lusutrombopag, 23 patients (74.2%) patients showed a platelet count of ≥ 50,000/µL (Group A) and did not require platelet transfusion. The remaining 8 patients (25.8%) did not reached platelet ≥ 50,000/µL (Group B). The means of platelet increase were 38,000/µL and 12,000/µL in groups A and B, respectively. A low platelet count at baseline was a characteristic of patients in group B. Among 13 patients who repeatedly used lusutrombopag, lusutrombopag significantly increased the platelet count as the initial treatment. When all repeated uses of lusutrombopag were counted among these 13 patients, platelet transfusion was not required in 82.1% (23/28) of treatments. Although one patient showed portal thrombosis after lusutrombopag treatment, the thrombosis was disappeared by anticoagulant treatment for 35 days. The degree of platelet increase with lusutrombopag was larger than that in their previous platelet transfusion. Conclusions The proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion was 74.2%, which is smaller than that in former studies which included CLD patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL. However, lusutrombopag is effective and safe for CLD patients with a platelet count of < 50,000/µL.


2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 306-312
Author(s):  
Brett Fortune ◽  
David Madoff ◽  
Benjamin May

AbstractInvasive procedures are common in the management of cirrhosis-related chronic liver disease (CLD). Assessing bleeding risk prior to these procedures is challenging because of commonly seen laboratory abnormalities among traditional testing used to evaluate bleeding risk in patients with advanced liver disease. However, this ‘coagulopathy’ seen in advanced liver disease is not a true bleeding or clotting disorder. The prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) test is frequently elevated in CLD patients, but has been shown to poorly correlate with bleeding risk in this population. A traditional interpretation of this laboratory test can lead to unnecessary transfusion of blood product, procedure delay, or even potential harm to the patient. An understanding of the ‘coagulopathy’ of advanced liver disease and alternative methods, to more accurately assess bleeding risk, allows clinicians to treat safely CLD patients.


Author(s):  
Yuno Nishida ◽  
Tomokazu Kawaoka ◽  
Michio Imamura ◽  
Maiko Namba ◽  
Yasutoshi Fujii ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document